Re: SOT: Yet another HP 8640b range&peak deviation combination gears lot
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Emanuele <emanuele_girlando@...> wrote: Slightly Off Topic..
4 more gears available now. Item no 320834621122. Hope this can help. Ciao. Emanuele. To save other people the trouble of looking, he charges 16.50 Euros + 11 Euros shipping (to the US), or about $35 total for a gear. Don't know why he doesn't mention that when he posts.
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Hi,
I downloaded the 2230 manual (thanks Tom...) to see how the PS was made, and then came to my mind a stupid question: is there a thermal shutdown board on your scope, and did you check it?
|
Re: Need Manual for Type W, SN 4560 & 5336
Hi Aaron,
It seems that you have two Type W's with the FET-Frontend and the PWB for these. With SN 7000 and above this was standard. For this late versions a new Manual was printed. FET-Frontends (less drift) were used in late Type 1A1's (I don't for sure also 1A2's) and the 1A7A (which has the same circuit as the later 7A22).
Egge Siert
|
Re: SOT: Yet another HP 8640b range&peak deviation combination gears lot
Slightly Off Topic..
4 more gears available now. Item no 320834621122. Hope this can help. Ciao. Emanuele.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In TekScopes@..., "Emanuele" <emanuele_girlando@...> wrote: Friends, for those interested, yet an additional lot of 9 gears is available now on Ebay. Item no is: 320652008101. Thanks. Emanuele.
|
Sold: Tek DC510 TM500 Counter (parts or repair)
On 1/22/2012 1:14 PM, Oz-in-DFW wrote: Unknown, untested, looks to be complete but clearly needs attention.
Known issues:
INST ID button is sticky Missing a side cover CHANNEL B BNC out of round, but looks reshapeable. ARM SMB is damaged and will need to be replaced.
High Res pics at
$50 or best offer +$15 shipping in US. International shipping is available, but you'll cover all costs, fees, and tariffs. -- mailto:oz@... Oz POB 93167 Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport)
|
Re: 7T11 trace shifting left as time/div rotated.
Yes, the measurements ware taken with both the coarse and fine "time position" controls fully clockwise, but that gives me something extra to check on tomorrow.
Regards, David Partridge
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Albert Sent: 22 January 2012 16:33 To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 7T11 trace shifting left as time/div rotated. Hi David, The start and stop levels should differ about 5 V. With start I (and you also I think) actually mean the stop level when the trace is at the left position. On the test scope you look at vertical position of the horizontal lines. It depends of Time Position. The graph 11 is for fully CW. If you rotate to fully CCW then the whole patter shift 5 V lower, from -5 V to -10 V. Albert Thinking rather more about this, the start voltage of -2.22V for the TTH Miller circuit doesn't sound right - from all my reading in the manual I think it should be starting at 0V, and the screen shots in the manual also suggest this. The waveforms shown for the Horiz. Amp. also suggest that there's no (or very little) DC offset.
Comments?
Thanks again Dave
------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Got a temperature controlled desoldering station with an air pump?
Mark
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 1/22/2012 11:14 AM, Tan Chor Ming wrote:
I wish I can use this approach but unfortunately it cannot be used in this case because place that are heating up ought to heat up but it may be heating up slightly more than usual.
This approach is good for part that should not heat up and is heating up.
Anyway, I do not have heat mist here.
Rgds,
Chor Ming
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] *On Behalf Of *Mark Wendt (Contractor) *Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2012 9:54 PM *To:* TekScopes@... *Subject:* Re: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
I've become a firm believer in the freeze mist. It really helped me recently find a problem transistor in a 7A13 plugin I have. Oh, and a relatively cheap IR thermometer with a laser dot pointer that I picked up from Radio Smack too. ;-)
Mark
On 1/21/2012 9:32 PM, amxcoder wrote:
If it actually is something heating up a little and then shutting down, it can be found with freeze mist. I can't remember how many times I have fixed equipment this way with very little trouble shooting.
Michael
|
FS: Tek DC510 TM500 Counter (parts or repair)
Unknown, untested, looks to be complete but clearly needs attention.
Known issues:
INST ID button is sticky Missing a side cover CHANNEL B BNC out of round, but looks reshapeable. ARM SMB is damaged and will need to be replaced.
High Res pics at
$50 or best offer +$15 shipping in US. International shipping is available, but you'll cover all costs, fees, and tariffs.
-- mailto:oz@... Oz POB 93167 Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport)
|
FS: Tek 067-1039-01 TM500 Pattern Generator
Unknown, untested, looks to be in decent shape.
High Res pics at
$50 or best offer +$15 shipping in US. International shipping is available, but you'll coverall costs, fees, and tariffs.
-- mailto:oz@... Oz POB 93167 Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport)
|
Re: Need Manual for Type W, SN 4560 & 5336
Aaron;
I believe you may be?looking at a "W" with the front-end mod kit
installed.
I have several "W"s and an NIB mod kit.
Will have to go diggin' though...
Bernd Schroder
?
In a message dated 1/22/2012 2:27:20 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
ataylor@... writes:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I recently acquired several 8416 tubes and decided to revive my two Type W
plugins. As soon as I started working on them, several discrepancies between
the manual and reality became apparent. Most noticeable is the circuit board
located directly in front of the plugin connector. It contains Q294 and
Q194(among other parts), which are not listed parts manifest of the manual on
BAMA. In fact, judging by Figure 5-2, that whole circuit board doesn't exist
in the manual I have. I haven't been able to find any other versions online.
Does anyone have either a scan of the correct manual or a hardcopy
that they would be willing to part with at a reasonable price? On my current
budget, reasonable is around $15.
This is for serial numbers 4560 and
5336 of the Type W.
Aaron
|
Full-time opening for a community leader for oscilloscope site
Hi there, I'm looking for a creative engineer/writer/community leader with some hands-on 'scope experience to run an online community focused on the use and application of that most critical of engineers?€? tools, the oscilloscope. Day-to-day responsibilities include one or two blogs and recruiting and managing other paid bloggers to do likewise, again with an emphasis on test issues and how scopes can be used to solve them, but with latitude to explore the life and daily issues designers face.
Position is full-time with competitive compensation, extensive benefits and broad exposure in the industry. Some travel may be required, for training and a couple of industry shows per year, but otherwise it?€?s a work-from-home (or wherever you prefer to work) position. If ou like scopes, and you're interested, let me know at patrick.mannion@....
|
Re: Tekscopes at the Computer History Museum
Friend worked on the F16, Fly-By-Wire control system and computer. It is an Analog Computer. Turns out, digits were simply not fast enough and powerful (number crunching) enough to deal with the real time requirements of fly-by-wire at that place in time.
Some how, the whole analog computing ideal has been set aside and forgotten by many binary computer centric folks.
Bernice
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- On Sun, 1/22/12, phosphorphile wrote: From: phosphorphile Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Tekscopes at the Computer History Museum To: TekScopes@... Date: Sunday, January 22, 2012, 5:22 PM
?
In the Navy in '65 I was treated to a visit inside an F4 Phantom simulator trailor. That was one big analog electromechanical maise on wheels. Analog computers laid the ground work for digital to take off from.
> ......They have heard of analog computers, sort of, but they're treated like the redheaded stepchild. .......
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Oh my, I see another long discussion starting :).
I think that when a high ESR is seen, most of the time, the capacitance falls. At least that is my observation. But also, the power dissipated is proportional to ESR and square law to (V)oltage (E^2).
Anyway, hot capacitors are not normal in my experience. Anyone else care to comment?
Regards, Tom M
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: Tan Chor Ming To: TekScopes@... Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 12:00 PM Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Hello Tom,
You are right, high ESR will have high ripple.
But heat on cap = (V ripple rms)* (V ripple rms) / ESR
(V ripple rms) depends on the capacitance. Higher capacitance ¨¤ less ripple
Without the ESR being low there will be less heat
This is what I thought, I stand corrected.
Rgds,
Chor Ming
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Thomas Miller Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 12:35 AM To: TekScopes@... Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Hello Tan,
You say:
"The filtering caps are also warm (quite hot) which means that it is filtering the ripple and converting to heat.
It's not an indication of good ESR though but poor ESR will have less heat. I do not suspect the caps causing the shutdown issue.
As an improvement, I may change it later but not now, unless I am convince that poor ESR can cause shutdown.
A high ESR will make the capacitor run hot because of the higher ripple voltage. If you detect a hot capacitor, you should replace it with a known good cap. You might just try tacking a good cap across the suspect cap to confirm the problem.
Regards,
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: Tan Chor Ming
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Ed,
Thank you for your extensive reply.
2220 is a storage 60mHz
2235 is a 100Mhz Non-storage
The power supply of the 2220 is quite similar to the 2235 which I can see from the layout.
These are some differences on the power supply
1.. 2220 has an additional -5V supply 2.. Current rating in at the 43V for 2220 is higher. Based on design, R912 is 357 ohm for 2235 and 549 ohm for 2220. This means current limit for 2235 = 0.86A and for 2220 = 1.3A 3.. The added current is needed to drive the digital storage function which is a separate board 4.. Based on calculation, Shutdown voltage at R907 for 2235 = 0.18V and for 2220 = 0.26V. Measured value on 2220 is .285V. I have a DMM, Analog Multimeter and my other scope a 2235 has also a failed SCR for the crowbar. I did not want to fire it up until I get the crowbar function fixed.
I am planning to get an isolation transformer and run it at 110, before I use my other scope if it is fixed to measure the signal of the 2220.
This is the development so far.
I have changed the following C925, C943, C942, C940 with little improvement
I have also remove the connector to Q9070 and solder it directly to the leads. This seems to have the most improvement
Lifted the +5V supply to the digital board
Measured voltage on R907 at cold state = 0.17V (about 0.85A on 43V)
Measured voltage on R907 in warm state (after 5 mins) = 0.19V (about 0.95A on 43V)
Scope can sustain operation for more than 15 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again for another 5~10 min and repeat.
This shows an intermittent overload condition.
Not that bad because the scope can be used with brief shutdown in-between.
Connect the +5V to the digital board
Measured voltage on R907 at cold state = 0.22V (about 1.1A on 43V)
Measured voltage on R907 in warm state (after 1 mins) = 0.25V (about 1.25A on 43V)
Scope can sustain operation for more than 1 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again repeat every seconds later. This shows a sustained overload condition.
Measured voltage on pin15 of U930 is 0.285, Clearly, the overload should not happen since this voltage limit for voltage at R907 before shutdown happens.
This confirms that there are spike signal riding on R907 that cause the comparator in U930 to cause a shutdown.
20Khz test
I thought maybe the pre-regular was running at slightly higher frequency causing the switching efficiency to drop which cause Q9070 and T906 to heat up.
Since I do have a working scope, I found an interesting way to test this without instrument.
1.. Connect a 470pf across C919 and the frequency will drop to ~15Khz because I can heard the switch buzz. 2.. Without the 470of, I could not heard the switching buzz, so I knew it must be slightly past 20Khz 3.. I confirm this because my son is able to hear the 20Khz buzz. ESR on Cap.
I tried to change caps on C960 and C961, but there is no change to the behaviour and leakage current on removed caps seems to be low, so I do not suspect it is a ESR on cap issue.
The filtering caps are also warm (quite hot) which means that it is filtering the ripple and converting to heat.
It's not an indication of good ESR though but poor ESR will have less heat. I do not suspect the caps causing the shutdown issue.
As an improvement, I may change it later but not now, unless I am convince that poor ESR can cause shutdown.
I am very much back to square one, because everything seems to point to a normal working scope except that heat generated has cause an overload condition
What's next.
1. Poor Switching
I suspect that there is a poor switching from Q9070 and CR907 which can cause Q9070 to heat up in forward inverter.
Haven't gotten the component so will have to explore this later.
Q9070 (P6N55) needs to be at least 600V, 6A, RDSon 1.5 ohm
CR907 (BDY73G) needs to at least 600V, 1A, Reverse recovery time 50nS. Need 2 of these for 2220 in parallel, I believe 2235 uses only one.
.
2.. Overload This is a likelihood but I need a reference to know if the current measure on +43V is too high.
How could power ESR cause overload?
Poor ESR will cause poor functional performance because there is high ripple on the DC but will it cause an overload?
Background.
Both scope were working scope which I have not used for more than a year
Final Action if all else fails.
I am quite sure if I run the 2220 at 110V the shutdown issue will go away because of lower generated heat with 110V.
If the problem persist, I will just have to switch to a lower line voltage supply on an isolation transformer.
Rgds,
Chor Ming
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Ed Breya Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 2:43 AM To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Yes indeed, the 2220 is virtually identical to the 2230 in most respects - just a notch down to fill the price v. performance market position at the time. The 2200 series models share the same basic power supply topology, tweaked to get more power for the digital storage add-ons.
Your equipment appears to be very limited, but you do have a working DMM and a "working" scope available for a few minutes at a time. You can use it to look at its own supplies and other circuitry, at least up to the point of shutdown.
Before delving further into the supply, I recommend that you first check your line voltage to see if it's on the high side, or possibly has transients or surges that may be causing the scopes to self-protect. I don't recall if the 2220 has the "trigger view" feature, but if so, set up for line triggering, and activate that to see roughly what the line looks like. This is band limited, so won't show fast transients. You can also look at the line voltage directly and more accurately with a X10 probe tip to the hot side. DO NOT connect the ground clip to anything, or preferably, disconnect it from the probe whenever poking around line voltage.
As I recall, the scopes should run on any line voltage between the specified limits, with no range switching needed. If you have access to a variac or step-down transformer you can try running at lower line voltage. If not, you can try loading down the branch circuit with extra lighting and appliances to see if it drops significantly, or even try something wired temporarily in series, like a space heater, coffee pot, or a large incandescent lamp.
Some background info should help:
1. Were these scopes working and then stopped, or did you just get them, and they didn't work? It seems from your initial post that they both failed at the same time. If so, one big thing in common would be line voltage problems. Do both scopes exhibit the same symptoms?
2. Is the available run time always about the same before shutting down? Does recycling the power make it run for the same length of time, or does it need to cool down first?
If the shutdown timing is fairly predictable, it may be good to monitor the outputs closely and watch to see if they sag or rise just before shutdown. Also, watch the display closely for dimming or blooming - evidence of same on the high voltage.
Also, look at the 20 kHz AC waveforms on the secondaries, ahead of the output rectifiers to see if they are nice, rounded squarish waves, and see if that shape changes just before shutdown.
That's probably enough for now.
I agree with the suggestion to revisit the 2235. It may be easier to fix, or you may luck out and find it's problem - then you'll have one fully working scope - a big improvement.
Ed
--- In TekScopes@..., David <davidwhess@...> wrote: > > When I was searching for a replacement channel swtich, I found that a > number of the 22xx series oscilloscopes have the same main board which > has the power supply including the 2213A, 2215A, 2230, 2232, 2235, > 2236 but not the 2213 or 2215. For the analog only models, the extra > outputs which would go to the digital storage board are tied to ground > to maintain bias on the channel switches. The 2220 is much rarer with > no online service manual so I never checked it. > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:28:59 -0800, "tom jobe" <tomjobe@...> > wrote: > > >Hi Tan, > >Some one told me that the 2220 is the 60 MHz version of the 2230 100 MHz > >scope. If this is true, the 2230 manual might be your best bet. It is > >available from several places including: > > > > > > > >Now that I hear about your experience level and what equipment you have on > >hand, I would fix the 2235 first as it has no top board limiting your access > >to the power supply (and almost everything else in the scope) while the > >scope is actually running. > > > >You mention the need for an isolation transformer. You probably do not need > >an isolation transformer at this point, as its only value is to be able to > >"float" the scope so you can use another scope to look at the inverter side > >of the power supply. The inverter is already making the 43 VDC so what would > >you need to check anyway? I know the service manual calls for an isolation > >transformer (so I bought one) but my experience finds it to be fairly > >useless in the 22xx repair process. Also, once you "float" the scope the > >chassis of the scope is now at some elevated voltage, which is a little > >scary for an amateur like me. > > > >You mentioned that Q908 was up on the heatsink but it isn't. Take a closer > >look as it only is involved in running the "gate" of Q9070. > >Q9070 is up on the heatsink. Q908 is a small transistor with minor currents > >through it, and Q9070 does the real work of creating the 43 VDC for the > >inverter. > > > >If you ever decide to do the external injection of the 43 VDC, you need to > >disconnect Q9070, not Q908. > >tom jobe... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...> > >To: <TekScopes@...> > >Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:37 PM > >Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220 > > > > > >> Thank you Tom for taking the time to point out specifically the likely > >cause > >> of the problem. > >> > >> I know it takes effort to go through the details and I really appreciate > >it. > >> > >> > >> > >> Just to let you know where I come from, so that there is less to assume. > >> > >> I am an electronics engineer from Singapore above 50 so very much familiar > >> with vacuum and solid state electronics. > >> > >> I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming it is > >quite > >> similar to 2235 which I have it downloaded. > >> > >> I have both 2220 and 2235 and there appear to be quite similar though the > >> PCB layout is slightly different. > >> > >> I have complete understanding of how the power supply works. > >> > >> Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and TP950 > >> > >> Final Regulator - DC-DC push-pull inverter through Q947 and Q946. > >> > >> > >> > >> I have another scope 2235, unfortunately, it too went down at the same > >time, > >> so the only instrument I have is a multimeter. > >> > >> Anyway, I do not have an isolation transformer so even with the 2235 > >> working, I will need to get an isolation transformer before I could take > >any > >> measurement. > >> > >> Any idea what VA rating is needed for the isolation transformer? > >> > >> Based on the power needs, it appears to be at least 200VA. > >> > >> > >> > >> Initially, I was asking about R907, not because I was suspecting the > >> resistor but I intend to check the load current by putting an ammeter in > >> series with the resistor. > >> > >> For that to be useful I need to know what is expected. Like you. I am > >> suspecting that the voltage at R907 has gone up after the set warms up > >thus > >> shutting down U930. > >> > >> > >> > >> I will probably go with the cap changes you have recommended since I have > >> some time during the Lunar New Year break. > >> > >> Unfortunately, I do not have ESR meter, but I don't think that a big issue > >> just replacing the caps. > >> > >> > >> > >> I am aware of the direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for telling me the > >> detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected. > >> > >> Unfortunately, I do not have a power supply with this voltage output. I > >> only have a power supply of 18V max 2A. So I will have to hold off this > >> approach. > >> > >> > >> > >> One more thing which I did not mention earlier is that I detached the > >+5.2V > >> connection to the digital board (for the storage function of 2220) and > >> behaviour remains unchanged. > >> > >> > >> > >> Rgds, > >> > >> Chor Ming > >> > >> _____ > >> > >> From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On > >Behalf > >> Of tom jobe > >> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:30 AM > >> To: TekScopes > >> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted it a few days ago, and > >I > >> did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not gotten the > >> answer > >> you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this. > >> First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it, and none > >of > >> the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including > >> ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar to > >the > >> better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply. I will > >> also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930 monitors > >> the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks the > >> current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down. > >> I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the value of R907 > >> drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a > >> possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem. > >> An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907 within the > >> inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the main > >> transformer. > >> How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment you have > >> available, and what your testing preferences might be. > >> If you don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In my > >> experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard cause > >> the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943. If you > >have > >> some decent soldering equipment you can change all three capacitors > >quickly > >> without removing the mainboard. > >> If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum > >> electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no > >> trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat sink for > >> Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps if you had > >> an ESR meter handy). > >> Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an external power > >> source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power supply > >> allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it and just > >> get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least > >disconnect > >> Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from the > >bottom > >> or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the bottom side to > >> make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal way when > >it > >> is powered with the external 43 VDC. > >> The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan, > >many > >> years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at: > >> > >> A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly available > >> components you might use to replace some of the original Tektronix part > >> numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can find it > >in > >> the Tekscopes Message archive if you like. > >> Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from chassis ground > >> to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into this > >repair > >> (with the scope not connected to the mains of course!). > >> There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get you > >> started. > >> This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand what you > >> are doing. > >> tom jobe... > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@... > >> <mailto:jonray03%40singnet.com.sg> > > >> To: <TekScopes@... <mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com> > > >> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM > >> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220 > >> > >> > Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power > >> supply? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Behaviour > >> > > >> > 1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for a > >few > >> > minutes > >> > > >> > 2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again and > >> it > >> > continues in this on/off mode > >> > > >> > 3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950) > >> > > >> > 4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are > >+8.6, -8.6, > >> > +5.2, +100 are all ok. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > What are likely problems before I start ripping the components from the > >> > circuit? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ttesenq@... <mailto:ttesenq%40tiscali.co.uk> suggested that > >it > >> could be the pre-regulator MOSFET > >> > P9070. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look likely > >> > because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire up > >> for > >> > a few minutes > >> > > >> > It is more likely a active component that weaken with increase > >> temperature, > >> > so ttesenq@... <mailto:ttesenq%40tiscali.co.uk> could be > >right. > >> > > >> > This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Any other possible lead of similar experience. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >
|
Re: Tekscopes at the Computer History Museum
In the Navy in '65 I was treated to a visit inside an F4 Phantom simulator trailor. That was one big analog electromechanical maise on wheels. Analog computers laid the ground work for digital to take off from.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
......They have heard of analog computers, sort of, but they're treated like the redheaded stepchild. .......
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Hello Tom,
You are right, high ESR will have high ripple.
But heat on cap = (V ripple rms)* (V ripple rms) / ESR
(V ripple rms) depends on the capacitance. Higher capacitance --> less ripple
Without the ESR being low there will be less heat
This is what I thought, I stand corrected.
Rgds,
Chor Ming
_____
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Thomas Miller Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 12:35 AM To: TekScopes@... Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Hello Tan,
You say:
"The filtering caps are also warm (quite hot) which means that it is filtering the ripple and converting to heat.
It's not an indication of good ESR though but poor ESR will have less heat. I do not suspect the caps causing the shutdown issue.
As an improvement, I may change it later but not now, unless I am convince that poor ESR can cause shutdown.
A high ESR will make the capacitor run hot because of the higher ripple voltage. If you detect a hot capacitor, you should replace it with a known good cap. You might just try tacking a good cap across the suspect cap to confirm the problem.
Regards,
Tom
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: Tan Chor <mailto:jonray03@...> Ming To: TekScopes@... Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 11:07 AM Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220 Ed, Thank you for your extensive reply. 2220 is a storage 60mHz 2235 is a 100Mhz Non-storage The power supply of the 2220 is quite similar to the 2235 which I can see from the layout. These are some differences on the power supply 1. 2220 has an additional -5V supply 2. Current rating in at the 43V for 2220 is higher. Based on design, R912 is 357 ohm for 2235 and 549 ohm for 2220. This means current limit for 2235 = 0.86A and for 2220 = 1.3A 3. The added current is needed to drive the digital storage function which is a separate board 4. Based on calculation, Shutdown voltage at R907 for 2235 = 0.18V and for 2220 = 0.26V. Measured value on 2220 is .285V. I have a DMM, Analog Multimeter and my other scope a 2235 has also a failed SCR for the crowbar. I did not want to fire it up until I get the crowbar function fixed. I am planning to get an isolation transformer and run it at 110, before I use my other scope if it is fixed to measure the signal of the 2220. This is the development so far. I have changed the following C925, C943, C942, C940 with little improvement I have also remove the connector to Q9070 and solder it directly to the leads. This seems to have the most improvement Lifted the +5V supply to the digital board Measured voltage on R907 at cold state = 0.17V (about 0.85A on 43V) Measured voltage on R907 in warm state (after 5 mins) = 0.19V (about 0.95A on 43V) Scope can sustain operation for more than 15 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again for another 5~10 min and repeat. This shows an intermittent overload condition. Not that bad because the scope can be used with brief shutdown in-between. Connect the +5V to the digital board Measured voltage on R907 at cold state = 0.22V (about 1.1A on 43V) Measured voltage on R907 in warm state (after 1 mins) = 0.25V (about 1.25A on 43V) Scope can sustain operation for more than 1 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again repeat every seconds later. This shows a sustained overload condition. Measured voltage on pin15 of U930 is 0.285, Clearly, the overload should not happen since this voltage limit for voltage at R907 before shutdown happens. This confirms that there are spike signal riding on R907 that cause the comparator in U930 to cause a shutdown. 20Khz test I thought maybe the pre-regular was running at slightly higher frequency causing the switching efficiency to drop which cause Q9070 and T906 to heat up. Since I do have a working scope, I found an interesting way to test this without instrument. 1. Connect a 470pf across C919 and the frequency will drop to ~15Khz because I can heard the switch buzz. 2. Without the 470of, I could not heard the switching buzz, so I knew it must be slightly past 20Khz 3. I confirm this because my son is able to hear the 20Khz buzz. ESR on Cap. I tried to change caps on C960 and C961, but there is no change to the behaviour and leakage current on removed caps seems to be low, so I do not suspect it is a ESR on cap issue. The filtering caps are also warm (quite hot) which means that it is filtering the ripple and converting to heat. It's not an indication of good ESR though but poor ESR will have less heat. I do not suspect the caps causing the shutdown issue. As an improvement, I may change it later but not now, unless I am convince that poor ESR can cause shutdown. I am very much back to square one, because everything seems to point to a normal working scope except that heat generated has cause an overload condition What's next. 1. Poor Switching I suspect that there is a poor switching from Q9070 and CR907 which can cause Q9070 to heat up in forward inverter. Haven't gotten the component so will have to explore this later. Q9070 (P6N55) needs to be at least 600V, 6A, RDSon 1.5 ohm CR907 (BDY73G) needs to at least 600V, 1A, Reverse recovery time 50nS. Need 2 of these for 2220 in parallel, I believe 2235 uses only one. . 2. Overload This is a likelihood but I need a reference to know if the current measure on +43V is too high. How could power ESR cause overload? Poor ESR will cause poor functional performance because there is high ripple on the DC but will it cause an overload? Background. Both scope were working scope which I have not used for more than a year Final Action if all else fails. I am quite sure if I run the 2220 at 110V the shutdown issue will go away because of lower generated heat with 110V. If the problem persist, I will just have to switch to a lower line voltage supply on an isolation transformer. Rgds, Chor Ming _____ From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Ed Breya Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 2:43 AM To: TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220 Yes indeed, the 2220 is virtually identical to the 2230 in most respects - just a notch down to fill the price v. performance market position at the time. The 2200 series models share the same basic power supply topology, tweaked to get more power for the digital storage add-ons. Your equipment appears to be very limited, but you do have a working DMM and a "working" scope available for a few minutes at a time. You can use it to look at its own supplies and other circuitry, at least up to the point of shutdown. Before delving further into the supply, I recommend that you first check your line voltage to see if it's on the high side, or possibly has transients or surges that may be causing the scopes to self-protect. I don't recall if the 2220 has the "trigger view" feature, but if so, set up for line triggering, and activate that to see roughly what the line looks like. This is band limited, so won't show fast transients. You can also look at the line voltage directly and more accurately with a X10 probe tip to the hot side. DO NOT connect the ground clip to anything, or preferably, disconnect it from the probe whenever poking around line voltage. As I recall, the scopes should run on any line voltage between the specified limits, with no range switching needed. If you have access to a variac or step-down transformer you can try running at lower line voltage. If not, you can try loading down the branch circuit with extra lighting and appliances to see if it drops significantly, or even try something wired temporarily in series, like a space heater, coffee pot, or a large incandescent lamp. Some background info should help: 1. Were these scopes working and then stopped, or did you just get them, and they didn't work? It seems from your initial post that they both failed at the same time. If so, one big thing in common would be line voltage problems. Do both scopes exhibit the same symptoms? 2. Is the available run time always about the same before shutting down? Does recycling the power make it run for the same length of time, or does it need to cool down first? If the shutdown timing is fairly predictable, it may be good to monitor the outputs closely and watch to see if they sag or rise just before shutdown. Also, watch the display closely for dimming or blooming - evidence of same on the high voltage. Also, look at the 20 kHz AC waveforms on the secondaries, ahead of the output rectifiers to see if they are nice, rounded squarish waves, and see if that shape changes just before shutdown. That's probably enough for now. I agree with the suggestion to revisit the 2235. It may be easier to fix, or you may luck out and find it's problem - then you'll have one fully working scope - a big improvement. Ed --- In TekScopes@... <mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com> , David <davidwhess@...> wrote: When I was searching for a replacement channel swtich, I found that a number of the 22xx series oscilloscopes have the same main board which has the power supply including the 2213A, 2215A, 2230, 2232, 2235, 2236 but not the 2213 or 2215. For the analog only models, the extra outputs which would go to the digital storage board are tied to ground to maintain bias on the channel switches. The 2220 is much rarer with no online service manual so I never checked it.
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:28:59 -0800, "tom jobe" <tomjobe@...> wrote:
Hi Tan, Some one told me that the 2220 is the 60 MHz version of the 2230 100 MHz scope. If this is true, the 2230 manual might be your best bet. It is available from several places including:
Now that I hear about your experience level and what equipment you have
on hand, I would fix the 2235 first as it has no top board limiting your
access to the power supply (and almost everything else in the scope) while the scope is actually running.
You mention the need for an isolation transformer. You probably do not
need an isolation transformer at this point, as its only value is to be able
to "float" the scope so you can use another scope to look at the inverter
side of the power supply. The inverter is already making the 43 VDC so what
would you need to check anyway? I know the service manual calls for an
isolation transformer (so I bought one) but my experience finds it to be fairly useless in the 22xx repair process. Also, once you "float" the scope the chassis of the scope is now at some elevated voltage, which is a little scary for an amateur like me.
You mentioned that Q908 was up on the heatsink but it isn't. Take a
closer look as it only is involved in running the "gate" of Q9070. Q9070 is up on the heatsink. Q908 is a small transistor with minor
currents through it, and Q9070 does the real work of creating the 43 VDC for the inverter.
If you ever decide to do the external injection of the 43 VDC, you need
to disconnect Q9070, not Q908. tom jobe...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...> To: <TekScopes@... <mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:37 PM Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Thank you Tom for taking the time to point out specifically the likely cause
of the problem.
I know it takes effort to go through the details and I really
appreciate it.
Just to let you know where I come from, so that there is less to
assume. I am an electronics engineer from Singapore above 50 so very much
familiar with vacuum and solid state electronics.
I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming it is quite
similar to 2235 which I have it downloaded.
I have both 2220 and 2235 and there appear to be quite similar though
the PCB layout is slightly different.
I have complete understanding of how the power supply works.
Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and TP950
Final Regulator - DC-DC push-pull inverter through Q947 and Q946.
I have another scope 2235, unfortunately, it too went down at the same time,
so the only instrument I have is a multimeter.
Anyway, I do not have an isolation transformer so even with the 2235 working, I will need to get an isolation transformer before I could
take any
measurement.
Any idea what VA rating is needed for the isolation transformer?
Based on the power needs, it appears to be at least 200VA.
Initially, I was asking about R907, not because I was suspecting the resistor but I intend to check the load current by putting an ammeter
in series with the resistor.
For that to be useful I need to know what is expected. Like you. I am suspecting that the voltage at R907 has gone up after the set warms up thus
shutting down U930.
I will probably go with the cap changes you have recommended since I
have some time during the Lunar New Year break.
Unfortunately, I do not have ESR meter, but I don't think that a big
issue just replacing the caps.
I am aware of the direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for telling me
the detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected.
Unfortunately, I do not have a power supply with this voltage output. I only have a power supply of 18V max 2A. So I will have to hold off this approach.
One more thing which I did not mention earlier is that I detached the +5.2V
connection to the digital board (for the storage function of 2220) and behaviour remains unchanged.
Rgds,
Chor Ming
_____
From: TekScopes@... <mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:TekScopes@... <mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
Of tom jobe Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:30 AM To: TekScopes Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted it a few days ago,
and I
did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not gotten the answer you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this. First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it, and
none of
the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar
to the
better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply. I
will also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930
monitors the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks the current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down. I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the value of
R907 drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem. An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907 within
the inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the main transformer. How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment you have available, and what your testing preferences might be. If you don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In
my experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard
cause the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943. If you have
some decent soldering equipment you can change all three capacitors quickly
without removing the mainboard. If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat sink
for Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps if you
had an ESR meter handy). Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an external
power source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power
supply allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it and
just get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least disconnect
Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from the bottom
or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the bottom side
to make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal way
when it
is powered with the external 43 VDC. The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan, many
years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at:
A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly
available components you might use to replace some of the original Tektronix part numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can find
it in
the Tekscopes Message archive if you like. Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from chassis
ground to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into this repair
(with the scope not connected to the mains of course!). There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get you started. This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand what
you are doing. tom jobe...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@... <mailto:jonray03%40singnet.com.sg> > To: <TekScopes@... <mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power supply?
Behaviour
1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for
a few
minutes
2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again
and it
continues in this on/off mode
3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950)
4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are +8.6, -8.6,
+5.2, +100 are all ok.
What are likely problems before I start ripping the components from
the circuit?
ttesenq@... <mailto:ttesenq%40tiscali.co.uk> suggested that it
could be the pre-regulator MOSFET
P9070.
I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look
likely because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire
up for
a few minutes
It is more likely a active component that weaken with increase temperature,
so ttesenq@... <mailto:ttesenq%40tiscali.co.uk> could be right.
This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
Any other possible lead of similar experience.
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Hello Tan,
?
You say:
?
"The filtering caps are
also warm (quite hot) which means that it is filtering the ripple and converting
to heat.?
It¡¯s not an indication
of good ESR though but poor ESR will have less heat.? I do not suspect the
caps causing the shutdown issue.?
As an improvement, I
may change it later but not now, unless I am convince that poor ESR can cause
shutdown.
?
A high ESR will make the capacitor run hot because of the higher ripple
voltage. If you detect a hot capacitor, you should replace it with a known good
cap. You might just try tacking a good cap across the suspect cap to confirm the
problem.
?
?
Regards,
Tom
?
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 11:07
AM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply
problem with Tek 2220
?
Ed,
Thank you for your
extensive reply.
2220 is a storage
60mHz
2235 is a 100Mhz
?Non-storage
The power supply of
the 2220 is quite similar to the 2235 which I can see from the layout.?
These are some
differences on the power supply
- 2220 has an
additional -5V supply
- Current rating
in at the 43V for 2220 is higher.? Based on design, R912 is 357 ohm for
2235 and 549 ohm for 2220.? This means current limit for 2235 = 0.86A
and for 2220 = 1.3A
- The added
current is needed to drive the digital storage function which is a separate
board
- Based on
calculation, Shutdown voltage at R907 for 2235 = 0.18V and for 2220 =
0.26V.? Measured value on 2220 is .285V.
I have a DMM, Analog
Multimeter and my other scope a 2235 has also a failed SCR for the
crowbar.? I did not want to fire it up until I get the crowbar function
fixed.
I am planning to get
an isolation transformer and run it at 110, before I use my other scope if it
is fixed to measure the signal of the 2220.
This is the
development so far.
I have changed the
following C925, C943, C942, C940 with little
improvement
I have also remove
the connector to Q9070 and solder it directly to the leads.? This seems
to have the most improvement
Lifted the +5V supply
to the digital board
Measured voltage on
R907 at cold state = 0.17V (about 0.85A on 43V)
Measured voltage on
R907 in warm state (after 5 mins) = 0.19V (about 0.95A on
43V)
Scope can sustain
operation for more than 15 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again for
another 5~10 min and repeat.?
This shows an
intermittent overload condition.
Not that bad because
the scope can be used with brief shutdown in-between.
Connect the +5V to
the digital board
Measured voltage on
R907 at cold state = 0.22V (about 1.1A on 43V)
Measured voltage on
R907 in warm state (after 1 mins) = 0.25V (about 1.25A on
43V)
Scope can sustain
operation for more than 1 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again
repeat every seconds later.? This shows a sustained overload
condition.
Measured voltage on
pin15 of U930 is 0.285, Clearly, the overload should not happen since this
voltage limit for voltage at R907 before shutdown
happens.
This confirms that
there are spike signal riding on R907 that cause the comparator in U930 to
cause a shutdown.
20Khz
test
I thought maybe the
pre-regular was running at slightly higher frequency causing the switching
efficiency to drop which cause Q9070 and T906 to heat
up.
Since I do have a
working scope, I found an interesting way to test this without
instrument.
- Connect a 470pf
across C919 and the frequency will drop to ~15Khz because I can heard the
switch buzz.
- Without the
470of, I could not heard the switching buzz, so I knew it must be slightly
past 20Khz
- I confirm this
because my son is able to hear the 20Khz buzz.
ESR on
Cap.
I tried to change
caps on C960 and C961, but there is no change to the behaviour and leakage
current on removed caps seems to be low, so I do not suspect it is a ESR on
cap issue.
The filtering caps
are also warm (quite hot) which means that it is filtering the ripple and
converting to heat.?
It¡¯s not an
indication of good ESR though but poor ESR will have less heat.? I do not
suspect the caps causing the shutdown issue.?
As an improvement, I
may change it later but not now, unless I am convince that poor ESR can cause
shutdown.
I am very much back
to square one, because everything seems to point to a normal working scope
except that heat generated has cause an overload condition
What¡¯s
next.
??????
1.? Poor Switching
I suspect that there
is a poor switching from Q9070 and CR907 which can cause Q9070 to heat up in
forward inverter.
Haven¡¯t gotten the
component so will have to explore this later.?
Q9070 (P6N55) needs
to be at least 600V, 6A, RDSon 1.5 ohm
CR907 (BDY73G) needs
to at least 600V, 1A, Reverse recovery time 50nS.? Need 2 of these for
2220 in parallel, I believe 2235 uses only one.
.
- Overload
This is a likelihood
but I need a reference to know if the current measure on +43V is too
high.
How could power ESR
cause overload?
Poor ESR will cause
poor functional performance because there is high ripple on the DC but will it
cause an overload?
Background.
Both scope were
working scope which I have not used for more than a
year
Final Action if all
else fails.
I am quite sure if I
run the 2220 at 110V the shutdown issue will go away because of lower
generated heat with 110V.
If the problem
persist, I will just have to switch to a lower line voltage supply on an
isolation transformer.
Rgds,
Chor
Ming
From:
TekScopes@...
[mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Ed Breya Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 2:43
AM To:
TekScopes@... Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Power supply
problem with Tek 2220
?
Yes
indeed, the 2220 is virtually identical to the 2230 in most respects - just a
notch down to fill the price v. performance market position at the time. The
2200 series models share the same basic power supply topology, tweaked to get
more power for the digital storage add-ons.
Your equipment appears to
be very limited, but you do have a working DMM and a "working" scope available
for a few minutes at a time. You can use it to look at its own supplies and
other circuitry, at least up to the point of shutdown.
Before delving
further into the supply, I recommend that you first check your line voltage to
see if it's on the high side, or possibly has transients or surges that may be
causing the scopes to self-protect. I don't recall if the 2220 has the
"trigger view" feature, but if so, set up for line triggering, and activate
that to see roughly what the line looks like. This is band limited, so won't
show fast transients. You can also look at the line voltage directly and more
accurately with a X10 probe tip to the hot side. DO NOT connect the ground
clip to anything, or preferably, disconnect it from the probe whenever poking
around line voltage.
As I recall, the scopes should run on any line
voltage between the specified limits, with no range switching needed. If you
have access to a variac or step-down transformer you can try running at lower
line voltage. If not, you can try loading down the branch circuit with extra
lighting and appliances to see if it drops significantly, or even try
something wired temporarily in series, like a space heater, coffee pot, or a
large incandescent lamp.
Some background info should help:
1.
Were these scopes working and then stopped, or did you just get them, and they
didn't work? It seems from your initial post that they both failed at the same
time. If so, one big thing in common would be line voltage problems. Do both
scopes exhibit the same symptoms?
2. Is the available run time always
about the same before shutting down? Does recycling the power make it run for
the same length of time, or does it need to cool down first?
If the
shutdown timing is fairly predictable, it may be good to monitor the outputs
closely and watch to see if they sag or rise just before shutdown. Also, watch
the display closely for dimming or blooming - evidence of same on the high
voltage.
Also, look at the 20 kHz AC waveforms on the secondaries,
ahead of the output rectifiers to see if they are nice, rounded squarish
waves, and see if that shape changes just before shutdown.
That's
probably enough for now.
I agree with the suggestion to revisit the
2235. It may be easier to fix, or you may luck out and find it's problem -
then you'll have one fully working scope - a big
improvement.
Ed
--- In TekScopes@..., David
wrote: > > When I was searching for a
replacement channel swtich, I found that a > number of the 22xx series
oscilloscopes have the same main board which > has the power supply
including the 2213A, 2215A, 2230, 2232, 2235, > 2236 but not the 2213 or
2215. For the analog only models, the extra > outputs which would go to
the digital storage board are tied to ground > to maintain bias on the
channel switches. The 2220 is much rarer with > no online service manual
so I never checked it. > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:28:59 -0800,
"tom jobe" > wrote: > > >Hi
Tan, > >Some one told me that the 2220 is the 60 MHz version of the
2230 100 MHz > >scope. If this is true, the 2230 manual might be your
best bet. It is > >available from several places including: >
> > > >
> > >Now that I hear about your experience level and what
equipment you have on > >hand, I would fix the 2235 first as it has
no top board limiting your access > >to the power supply (and almost
everything else in the scope) while the > >scope is actually
running. > > > >You mention the need for an isolation
transformer. You probably do not need > >an isolation transformer at
this point, as its only value is to be able to > >"float" the scope
so you can use another scope to look at the inverter side > >of the
power supply. The inverter is already making the 43 VDC so what would >
>you need to check anyway? I know the service manual calls for an
isolation > >transformer (so I bought one) but my experience finds it
to be fairly > >useless in the 22xx repair process. Also, once you
"float" the scope the > >chassis of the scope is now at some elevated
voltage, which is a little > >scary for an amateur like me. >
> > >You mentioned that Q908 was up on the heatsink but it isn't.
Take a closer > >look as it only is involved in running the "gate" of
Q9070. > >Q9070 is up on the heatsink. Q908 is a small transistor
with minor currents > >through it, and Q9070 does the real work of
creating the 43 VDC for the > >inverter. > > > >If
you ever decide to do the external injection of the 43 VDC, you need
to > >disconnect Q9070, not Q908. > >tom jobe... >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Tan Chor Ming" > >To: <TekScopes@...> >
>Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:37 PM > >Subject: RE:
[TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220 > > >
> > >> Thank you Tom for taking the time to point out
specifically the likely > >cause > >> of the
problem. > >> > >> I know it takes effort to go
through the details and I really appreciate > >it. >
>> > >> > >> > >> Just to let you
know where I come from, so that there is less to assume. >
>> > >> I am an electronics engineer from
Singapore above 50 so very much familiar >
>> with vacuum and solid state electronics. > >> >
>> I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming it
is > >quite > >> similar to 2235 which I have it
downloaded. > >> > >> I have both 2220 and 2235 and
there appear to be quite similar though the > >> PCB layout is
slightly different. > >> > >> I have complete
understanding of how the power supply works. > >> > >>
Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and
TP950 > >> > >> Final Regulator - DC-DC push-pull
inverter through Q947 and Q946. > >> > >> >
>> > >> I have another scope 2235, unfortunately, it too
went down at the same > >time, > >> so the only
instrument I have is a multimeter. > >> > >> Anyway, I
do not have an isolation transformer so even with the 2235 > >>
working, I will need to get an isolation transformer before I could
take > >any > >> measurement. > >> >
>> Any idea what VA rating is needed for the isolation
transformer? > >> > >> Based on the power needs, it
appears to be at least 200VA. > >> > >> >
>> > >> Initially, I was asking about R907, not because I
was suspecting the > >> resistor but I intend to check the load
current by putting an ammeter in > >> series with the
resistor. > >> > >> For that to be useful I need to
know what is expected. Like you. I am > >> suspecting that the
voltage at R907 has gone up after the set warms up > >thus >
>> shutting down U930. > >> > >> >
>> > >> I will probably go with the cap changes you have
recommended since I have > >> some time during the Lunar New Year
break. > >> > >> Unfortunately, I do not have ESR
meter, but I don't think that a big issue > >> just replacing the
caps. > >> > >> > >> > >> I am
aware of the direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for telling me the >
>> detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected. > >> >
>> Unfortunately, I do not have a power supply with this voltage output.
I > >> only have a power supply of 18V max 2A. So I will have to
hold off this > >> approach. > >> >
>> > >> > >> One more thing which I did not
mention earlier is that I detached the > >+5.2V > >>
connection to the digital board (for the storage function of 2220) and >
>> behaviour remains unchanged. > >> >
>> > >> > >> Rgds, > >> >
>> Chor Ming > >> > >> _____ >
>> > >> From: TekScopes@...
[mailto:TekScopes@...]
On > >Behalf > >> Of tom jobe > >> Sent:
Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:30 AM > >> To: TekScopes >
>> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220 >
>> > >> > >> > >> >
>> > >> I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted
it a few days ago, and > >I > >> did not have a nice
short answer for you. Since you have not gotten the > >>
answer > >> you were looking for, let me comment a bit on
this. > >> First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service
manual for it, and none > >of > >> the download sites I
checked seem to have it either, including > >> ArtekMedia.com
having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar to >
>the > >> better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the
power supply. I will > >> also assume that you do have a service
manual to work with. U930 monitors > >> the voltage drop across
R907, and in your case it probably thinks the > >> current is too
high after a few minutes, so it shuts down. > >> I have worked on
lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the value of R907 > >>
drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a >
>> possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem. >
>> An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907 within
the > >> inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side
of the main > >> transformer. > >> How you go about
finding the problem depends on what equipment you have > >>
available, and what your testing preferences might be. > >> If you
don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In my >
>> experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard
cause > >> the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942
and C943. If you > >have > >> some decent soldering
equipment you can change all three capacitors > >quickly >
>> without removing the mainboard. > >> If you have access
to an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum > >>
electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no >
>> trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat sink
for > >> Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the
electrolytic caps if you had > >> an ESR meter handy). >
>> Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an external
power > >> source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If
your power supply > >> allowed you to adjust the current limit you
could sneak up on it and just > >> get the problem part(s) nice
and warm. You will need to at least > >disconnect > >>
Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from the >
>bottom > >> or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two
wires to the bottom side to > >> make the 43 VDC connections. You
can use the scope in its normal way when > >it > >> is
powered with the external 43 VDC. > >> The external 43 VDC idea
came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan, > >many >
>> years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read
at: > >> >
>> A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly
available > >> components you might use to replace some of the
original Tektronix part > >> numbers that often fail. I can send
you that directly or you can find it > >in > >> the
Tekscopes Message archive if you like. > >> Another thing you
might do is take resistance readings from chassis ground > >> to
each of the voltage test points before you get very far into this >
>repair > >> (with the scope not connected to the mains of
course!). > >> There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but
this should get you > >> started. > >> This will be a
simple fix, so just take your time and understand what you > >>
are doing. > >> tom jobe... > >> > >>
----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Tan Chor Ming"
<jonray03@... > >>
> > >> To: <TekScopes@...
> > >> Sent: Friday,
January 20, 2012 6:45 AM > >> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power
supply problem with Tek 2220 > >> > >> > Has anyone
seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power > >>
supply? > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > Behaviour > >> > > >>
> 1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for
a > >few > >> > minutes > >> > >
>> > 2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on
again and > >> it > >> > continues in this on/off
mode > >> > > >> > 3. Pre-regulator out = 43V
(between TP940 and TP950) > >> > > >> > 4. All
voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are > >+8.6,
-8.6, > >> > +5.2, +100 are all ok. > >>
> > >> > > >> > > >> > What
are likely problems before I start ripping the components from the >
>> > circuit? > >> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > ttesenq@...
suggested that > >it >
>> could be the pre-regulator MOSFET > >> >
P9070. > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it
doe not look likely > >> > because electrolytic failure would
not have allowed the unit to fire up > >> for > >>
> a few minutes > >> > > >> > It is more
likely a active component that weaken with increase > >>
temperature, > >> > so ttesenq@...
could be > >right. >
>> > > >> > This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also
likely components > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > Any other possible lead of similar
experience. > >> > > >> > >
>> > >> > >> >
>> >
|
Re: 7T11 trace shifting left as time/div rotated.
Hi David, The start and stop levels should differ about 5 V. With start I (and you also I think) actually mean the stop level when the trace is at the left position. On the test scope you look at vertical position of the horizontal lines. It depends of Time Position. The graph 11 is for fully CW. If you rotate to fully CCW then the whole patter shift 5 V lower, from -5 V to -10 V. Albert
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thinking rather more about this, the start voltage of -2.22V for the TTH Miller circuit doesn't sound right - from all my reading in the manual I think it should be starting at 0V, and the screen shots in the manual also suggest this. The waveforms shown for the Horiz. Amp. also suggest that there's no (or very little) DC offset.
Comments?
Thanks again Dave
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Thanks Tom,
I will download it.
?
You are right, the Q9070 is on the
heatsink.? I was referring to the U930 driving via Q908 (and CR908) to
reach Q9070.
Noted on the connection to be broken for
direct 43V injection.
?
Noted on not having the need for the
isolation transformer for measurement.
Yes, I am aware of the risk of a floated
connection.
Then power supply in my country (Singapore) is similar to UK which is 3-pin.?
To do that, the earth line will have to be
lifted
?
I will probably go for the isolation transformer
but for a different reason.
If the 2220 overload is due to heat, then
using a 110V instead of the current 230V will definitely generated less heat on
the Q9070.
So isolation is an added benefit. ?
?
Rgds,
Chor Ming
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of tom jobe
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012
10:29 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
Hi Tan,
Some one told me that the 2220 is the 60 MHz version of the 2230 100 MHz
scope. If this is true, the 2230 manual might be your best bet. It is
available from several places including:
Now that I hear about your experience level and what equipment you have on
hand, I would fix the 2235 first as it has no top board limiting your access
to the power supply (and almost everything else in the scope) while the
scope is actually running.
You mention the need for an isolation transformer. You probably do not need
an isolation transformer at this point, as its only value is to be able to
"float" the scope so you can use another scope to look at the
inverter side
of the power supply. The inverter is already making the 43 VDC so what would
you need to check anyway? I know the service manual calls for an isolation
transformer (so I bought one) but my experience finds it to be fairly
useless in the 22xx repair process. Also, once you "float" the scope
the
chassis of the scope is now at some elevated voltage, which is a little
scary for an amateur like me.
You mentioned that Q908 was up on the heatsink but it isn't. Take a closer
look as it only is involved in running the "gate" of Q9070.
Q9070 is up on the heatsink. Q908 is a small transistor with minor currents
through it, and Q9070 does the real work of creating the 43 VDC for the
inverter.
If you ever decide to do the external injection of the 43 VDC, you need to
disconnect Q9070, not Q908.
tom jobe...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...>
To: <TekScopes@...>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:37 PM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> Thank you Tom for taking the time to point out specifically the likely
cause
> of the problem.
>
> I know it takes effort to go through the details and I really appreciate
it.
>
>
>
> Just to let you know where I come from, so that there is less to assume.
>
> I am an electronics engineer from Singapore above 50 so very much
familiar
> with vacuum and solid state electronics.
>
> I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming it is
quite
> similar to 2235 which I have it downloaded.
>
> I have both 2220 and 2235 and there appear to be quite similar though the
> PCB layout is slightly different.
>
> I have complete understanding of how the power supply works.
>
> Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and TP950
>
> Final Regulator - DC-DC push-pull inverter through Q947 and Q946.
>
>
>
> I have another scope 2235, unfortunately, it too went down at the same
time,
> so the only instrument I have is a multimeter.
>
> Anyway, I do not have an isolation transformer so even with the 2235
> working, I will need to get an isolation transformer before I could take
any
> measurement.
>
> Any idea what VA rating is needed for the isolation transformer?
>
> Based on the power needs, it appears to be at least 200VA.
>
>
>
> Initially, I was asking about R907, not because I was suspecting the
> resistor but I intend to check the load current by putting an ammeter in
> series with the resistor.
>
> For that to be useful I need to know what is expected. Like you. I am
> suspecting that the voltage at R907 has gone up after the set warms up
thus
> shutting down U930.
>
>
>
> I will probably go with the cap changes you have recommended since I have
> some time during the Lunar New Year break.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have ESR meter, but I don't think that a big issue
> just replacing the caps.
>
>
>
> I am aware of the direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for telling me the
> detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have a power supply with this voltage output. I
> only have a power supply of 18V max 2A. So I will have to hold off this
> approach.
>
>
>
> One more thing which I did not mention earlier is that I detached the
+5.2V
> connection to the digital board (for the storage function of 2220) and
> behaviour remains unchanged.
>
>
>
> Rgds,
>
> Chor Ming
>
> _____
>
> From: TekScopes@...
[mailto:TekScopes@...]
On
Behalf
> Of tom jobe
> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:30 AM
> To: TekScopes
> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
>
>
>
>
>
> I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted it a few days ago, and
I
> did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not gotten the
> answer
> you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this.
> First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it, and none
of
> the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including
> ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is similar to
the
> better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply. I will
> also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930 monitors
> the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks the
> current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down.
> I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the value of R907
> drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a
> possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem.
> An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907 within the
> inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the main
> transformer.
> How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment you have
> available, and what your testing preferences might be.
> If you don't have much to work with, just start changing components. In my
> experience the components in the right rear corner of the mainboard cause
> the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943. If you
have
> some decent soldering equipment you can change all three capacitors
quickly
> without removing the mainboard.
> If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the aluminum
> electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics give no
> trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat sink for
> Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps if you had
> an ESR meter handy).
> Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an external power
> source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power supply
> allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it and just
> get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least
disconnect
> Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from the
bottom
> or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the bottom side to
> make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal way when
it
> is powered with the external 43 VDC.
> The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named Hakan,
many
> years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at:
>
> A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly available
> components you might use to replace some of the original Tektronix part
> numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can find it
in
> the Tekscopes Message archive if you like.
> Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from chassis ground
> to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into this
repair
> (with the scope not connected to the mains of course!).
> There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get you
> started.
> This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand what you
> are doing.
> tom jobe...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tan Chor Ming" <jonray03@...
> >
> To: <TekScopes@...
>
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
>
> > Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series scope power
> supply?
> >
> >
> >
> > Behaviour
> >
> > 1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and stay on for
a
few
> > minutes
> >
> > 2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to on again
and
> it
> > continues in this on/off mode
> >
> > 3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950)
> >
> > 4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes are
+8.6, -8.6,
> > +5.2, +100 are all ok.
> >
> >
> >
> > What are likely problems before I start ripping the components from
the
> > circuit?
> >
> >
> >
> > ttesenq@...
it
> could be the pre-regulator MOSFET
> > P9070.
> >
> >
> >
> > I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not look
likely
> > because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit to fire
up
> for
> > a few minutes
> >
> > It is more likely a active component that weaken with increase
> temperature,
> > so ttesenq@...
could be
right.
> >
> > This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
> >
> >
> >
> > Any other possible lead of similar experience.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
I wish I can use this approach but
unfortunately it cannot be used in this case because place that are heating up
ought to heat up but it may be heating up slightly more than usual.
This approach is good for part that should
not heat up and is heating up.
Anyway, I do not have heat mist here.
?
Rgds,
Chor Ming
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Mark Wendt (Contractor)
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012
9:54 PM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Re: Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
I've become a firm believer in the freeze mist. It
really helped me
recently find a problem transistor in a 7A13 plugin I have. Oh, and a
relatively cheap IR thermometer with a laser dot pointer that I picked
up from Radio Smack too. ;-)
Mark
On 1/21/2012 9:32 PM, amxcoder wrote:
> If it actually is something heating up a little and then shutting down, it
can be found with freeze mist. I can't remember how many times I have fixed
equipment this way with very little trouble shooting.
>
> Michael
>
|
Re: Power supply problem with Tek 2220
Ed,
Thank you for your extensive reply.
?
2220 is a storage 60mHz
2235 is a 100Mhz ?Non-storage
The power supply of the 2220 is quite
similar to the 2235 which I can see from the layout.?
These are some differences on the power
supply
- 2220
has an additional -5V supply
- Current
rating in at the 43V for 2220 is higher.? Based on design, R912 is
357 ohm for 2235 and 549 ohm for 2220.? This means current limit for
2235 = 0.86A and for 2220 = 1.3A
- The
added current is needed to drive the digital storage function which is a
separate board
- Based
on calculation, Shutdown voltage at R907 for 2235 = 0.18V and for 2220 = 0.26V.?
Measured value on 2220 is .285V.
?
I have a DMM, Analog Multimeter and my
other scope a 2235 has also a failed SCR for the crowbar.? I did not want
to fire it up until I get the crowbar function fixed.
I am planning to get an isolation
transformer and run it at 110, before I use my other scope if it is fixed to
measure the signal of the 2220.
?
This is the development
so far.
I have changed the following C925, C943,
C942, C940 with little improvement
I have also remove the connector to Q9070
and solder it directly to the leads.? This seems to have the most
improvement
Lifted the +5V supply to the digital board
Measured voltage on R907 at cold state =
0.17V (about 0.85A on 43V)
Measured voltage on R907 in warm state
(after 5 mins) = 0.19V (about 0.95A on 43V)
Scope can sustain operation for more than
15 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again for another 5~10 min and
repeat.?
This shows an intermittent overload
condition.
Not that bad because the scope can be used
with brief shutdown in-between.
?
?
Connect the +5V to the digital board
Measured voltage on R907 at cold state =
0.22V (about 1.1A on 43V)
Measured voltage on R907 in warm state
(after 1 mins) = 0.25V (about 1.25A on 43V)
Scope can sustain operation for more than
1 minutes before the supply shutdown and up again repeat every seconds later.?
This shows a sustained overload condition.
?
Measured voltage on pin15 of U930 is 0.285,
Clearly, the overload should not happen since this voltage limit for voltage at
R907 before shutdown happens.
This confirms that there are spike signal
riding on R907 that cause the comparator in U930 to cause a shutdown.
?
20Khz test
I thought maybe the pre-regular was
running at slightly higher frequency causing the switching efficiency to drop
which cause Q9070 and T906 to heat up.
Since I do have a working scope, I found
an interesting way to test this without instrument.
- Connect
a 470pf across C919 and the frequency will drop to ~15Khz because I can
heard the switch buzz.
- Without
the 470of, I could not heard the switching buzz, so I knew it must be slightly
past 20Khz
- I
confirm this because my son is able to hear the 20Khz buzz.
?
ESR on Cap.
I tried to change caps on C960 and C961,
but there is no change to the behaviour and leakage current on removed caps seems
to be low, so I do not suspect it is a ESR on cap issue.
The filtering caps are also warm (quite
hot) which means that it is filtering the ripple and converting to heat.?
It¡¯s not an indication of good ESR
though but poor ESR will have less heat.? I do not suspect the caps
causing the shutdown issue.?
As an improvement, I may change it later
but not now, unless I am convince that poor ESR can cause shutdown.
?
I am very much back to square one, because
everything seems to point to a normal working scope except that heat generated has
cause an overload condition
?
What¡¯s next.
?????? 1.?
Poor Switching
I suspect that there is a
poor switching from Q9070 and CR907 which can cause Q9070 to heat up in forward
inverter.
Haven¡¯t gotten the
component so will have to explore this later.?
Q9070 (P6N55) needs to be
at least 600V, 6A, RDSon 1.5 ohm
CR907 (BDY73G) needs to
at least 600V, 1A, Reverse recovery time 50nS.? Need 2 of these for 2220
in parallel, I believe 2235 uses only one.
.
- Overload
This is a likelihood but I
need a reference to know if the current measure on +43V is too high.
How could power ESR cause
overload?
Poor ESR will cause poor functional
performance because there is high ripple on the DC but will it cause an
overload?
?
Background.
Both scope were working scope which I have
not used for more than a year
?
Final Action if all else
fails.
I am quite sure if I run the 2220 at 110V
the shutdown issue will go away because of lower generated heat with 110V.
If the problem persist, I will just have
to switch to a lower line voltage supply on an isolation transformer.
?
Rgds,
Chor Ming
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of Ed Breya
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012
2:43 AM
To: TekScopes@...
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: Power
supply problem with Tek 2220
?
?
Yes indeed, the 2220 is virtually identical to the
2230 in most respects - just a notch down to fill the price v. performance
market position at the time. The 2200 series models share the same basic power
supply topology, tweaked to get more power for the digital storage add-ons.
Your equipment appears to be very limited, but you do have a working DMM and a
"working" scope available for a few minutes at a time. You can use it
to look at its own supplies and other circuitry, at least up to the point of
shutdown.
Before delving further into the supply, I recommend that you first check your
line voltage to see if it's on the high side, or possibly has transients or
surges that may be causing the scopes to self-protect. I don't recall if the
2220 has the "trigger view" feature, but if so, set up for line
triggering, and activate that to see roughly what the line looks like. This is
band limited, so won't show fast transients. You can also look at the line
voltage directly and more accurately with a X10 probe tip to the hot side. DO
NOT connect the ground clip to anything, or preferably, disconnect it from the
probe whenever poking around line voltage.
As I recall, the scopes should run on any line voltage between the specified
limits, with no range switching needed. If you have access to a variac or
step-down transformer you can try running at lower line voltage. If not, you
can try loading down the branch circuit with extra lighting and appliances to
see if it drops significantly, or even try something wired temporarily in
series, like a space heater, coffee pot, or a large incandescent lamp.
Some background info should help:
1. Were these scopes working and then stopped, or did you just get them, and
they didn't work? It seems from your initial post that they both failed at the
same time. If so, one big thing in common would be line voltage problems. Do
both scopes exhibit the same symptoms?
2. Is the available run time always about the same before shutting down? Does
recycling the power make it run for the same length of time, or does it need to
cool down first?
If the shutdown timing is fairly predictable, it may be good to monitor the
outputs closely and watch to see if they sag or rise just before shutdown.
Also, watch the display closely for dimming or blooming - evidence of same on
the high voltage.
Also, look at the 20 kHz AC waveforms on the secondaries, ahead of the output
rectifiers to see if they are nice, rounded squarish waves, and see if that
shape changes just before shutdown.
That's probably enough for now.
I agree with the suggestion to revisit the 2235. It may be easier to fix, or
you may luck out and find it's problem - then you'll have one fully working
scope - a big improvement.
Ed
--- In TekScopes@...,
David wrote:
>
> When I was searching for a replacement channel swtich, I found that a
> number of the 22xx series oscilloscopes have the same main board which
> has the power supply including the 2213A, 2215A, 2230, 2232, 2235,
> 2236 but not the 2213 or 2215. For the analog only models, the extra
> outputs which would go to the digital storage board are tied to ground
> to maintain bias on the channel switches. The 2220 is much rarer with
> no online service manual so I never checked it.
>
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:28:59 -0800, "tom jobe"
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Tan,
> >Some one told me that the 2220 is the 60 MHz version of the 2230 100
MHz
> >scope. If this is true, the 2230 manual might be your best bet. It is
> >available from several places including:
> >
> >
> >
> >Now that I hear about your experience level and what equipment you
have on
> >hand, I would fix the 2235 first as it has no top board limiting your
access
> >to the power supply (and almost everything else in the scope) while
the
> >scope is actually running.
> >
> >You mention the need for an isolation transformer. You probably do not
need
> >an isolation transformer at this point, as its only value is to be
able to
> >"float" the scope so you can use another scope to look at
the inverter side
> >of the power supply. The inverter is already making the 43 VDC so what
would
> >you need to check anyway? I know the service manual calls for an
isolation
> >transformer (so I bought one) but my experience finds it to be fairly
> >useless in the 22xx repair process. Also, once you "float"
the scope the
> >chassis of the scope is now at some elevated voltage, which is a
little
> >scary for an amateur like me.
> >
> >You mentioned that Q908 was up on the heatsink but it isn't. Take a
closer
> >look as it only is involved in running the "gate" of Q9070.
> >Q9070 is up on the heatsink. Q908 is a small transistor with minor
currents
> >through it, and Q9070 does the real work of creating the 43 VDC for
the
> >inverter.
> >
> >If you ever decide to do the external injection of the 43 VDC, you
need to
> >disconnect Q9070, not Q908.
> >tom jobe...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Tan Chor Ming"
> >To: <TekScopes@...>
> >Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:37 PM
> >Subject: RE: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> >
> >
> >> Thank you Tom for taking the time to point out specifically the
likely
> >cause
> >> of the problem.
> >>
> >> I know it takes effort to go through the details and I really
appreciate
> >it.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Just to let you know where I come from, so that there is less to
assume.
> >>
> >> I am an electronics engineer from Singapore above 50 so very much
familiar
> >> with vacuum and solid state electronics.
> >>
> >> I do not have the schematics for 2220 so like you I am assuming
it is
> >quite
> >> similar to 2235 which I have it downloaded.
> >>
> >> I have both 2220 and 2235 and there appear to be quite similar
though the
> >> PCB layout is slightly different.
> >>
> >> I have complete understanding of how the power supply works.
> >>
> >> Pre-regulator - PWM driving Q908 to produce +43V across TP940 and
TP950
> >>
> >> Final Regulator - DC-DC push-pull inverter through Q947 and Q946.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I have another scope 2235, unfortunately, it too went down at the
same
> >time,
> >> so the only instrument I have is a multimeter.
> >>
> >> Anyway, I do not have an isolation transformer so even with the
2235
> >> working, I will need to get an isolation transformer before I
could take
> >any
> >> measurement.
> >>
> >> Any idea what VA rating is needed for the isolation transformer?
> >>
> >> Based on the power needs, it appears to be at least 200VA.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Initially, I was asking about R907, not because I was suspecting
the
> >> resistor but I intend to check the load current by putting an
ammeter in
> >> series with the resistor.
> >>
> >> For that to be useful I need to know what is expected. Like you.
I am
> >> suspecting that the voltage at R907 has gone up after the set
warms up
> >thus
> >> shutting down U930.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I will probably go with the cap changes you have recommended
since I have
> >> some time during the Lunar New Year break.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, I do not have ESR meter, but I don't think that a
big issue
> >> just replacing the caps.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I am aware of the direct 43Vdc injection, but thank you for
telling me the
> >> detail that Q908 needs to be disconnected.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, I do not have a power supply with this voltage
output. I
> >> only have a power supply of 18V max 2A. So I will have to hold
off this
> >> approach.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> One more thing which I did not mention earlier is that I detached
the
> >+5.2V
> >> connection to the digital board (for the storage function of
2220) and
> >> behaviour remains unchanged.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rgds,
> >>
> >> Chor Ming
> >>
> >> _____
> >>
> >> From: TekScopes@...
[mailto:TekScopes@...]
On
> >Behalf
> >> Of tom jobe
> >> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 7:30 AM
> >> To: TekScopes
> >> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I saw your 2220 question the first time you posted it a few days
ago, and
> >I
> >> did not have a nice short answer for you. Since you have not
gotten the
> >> answer
> >> you were looking for, let me comment a bit on this.
> >> First off, I don't own a 2220 or have the service manual for it,
and none
> >of
> >> the download sites I checked seem to have it either, including
> >> ArtekMedia.com having it for purchase. So I will assume it is
similar to
> >the
> >> better 22xx's such as the 2235, at least around the power supply.
I will
> >> also assume that you do have a service manual to work with. U930
monitors
> >> the voltage drop across R907, and in your case it probably thinks
the
> >> current is too high after a few minutes, so it shuts down.
> >> I have worked on lots of 22xx scopes and I have not seen the
value of R907
> >> drift and cause this problem, but others have reported that as a
> >> possibility. Odds are, that this is not your problem.
> >> An over current situation can be caused by anything after R907
within the
> >> inverter, the transformer itself or on the secondary side of the
main
> >> transformer.
> >> How you go about finding the problem depends on what equipment
you have
> >> available, and what your testing preferences might be.
> >> If you don't have much to work with, just start changing
components. In my
> >> experience the components in the right rear corner of the
mainboard cause
> >> the most grief so I would start there with C925, C942 and C943.
If you
> >have
> >> some decent soldering equipment you can change all three
capacitors
> >quickly
> >> without removing the mainboard.
> >> If you have access to an ESR meter you could check all of the
aluminum
> >> electrolytic capacitors in circuit. Most of the electrolytics
give no
> >> trouble, especially the six(?) 840 uF caps in front of the heat
sink for
> >> Q9070 (but you would want to check all of the electrolytic caps
if you had
> >> an ESR meter handy).
> >> Another approach would be to put in the 43 volts DC from an
external power
> >> source until something got hot or went up in smoke. If your power
supply
> >> allowed you to adjust the current limit you could sneak up on it
and just
> >> get the problem part(s) nice and warm. You will need to at least
> >disconnect
> >> Q9070 when you apply the external 43 VDC at TP940 and TP 950 from
the
> >bottom
> >> or top of the mainboard. I lightly tack on two wires to the
bottom side to
> >> make the 43 VDC connections. You can use the scope in its normal
way when
> >it
> >> is powered with the external 43 VDC.
> >> The external 43 VDC idea came from a fine Tekscopes member named
Hakan,
> >many
> >> years ago, and he has an excellent document you should read at:
> >>
> >> A couple of years ago I made up a document listing some commonly
available
> >> components you might use to replace some of the original
Tektronix part
> >> numbers that often fail. I can send you that directly or you can
find it
> >in
> >> the Tekscopes Message archive if you like.
> >> Another thing you might do is take resistance readings from
chassis ground
> >> to each of the voltage test points before you get very far into
this
> >repair
> >> (with the scope not connected to the mains of course!).
> >> There are lots of other ideas to add to this, but this should get
you
> >> started.
> >> This will be a simple fix, so just take your time and understand
what you
> >> are doing.
> >> tom jobe...
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Tan Chor Ming"
> >> >
> >> To: <TekScopes@...
>
> >> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 6:45 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Power supply problem with Tek 2220
> >>
> >> > Has anyone seen this behaviour repairing Tek2000 series
scope power
> >> supply?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Behaviour
> >> >
> >> > 1. When power on from cold, it will fire up properly and
stay on for a
> >few
> >> > minutes
> >> >
> >> > 2. Once it warms up, the power supply shut down and try to
on again and
> >> it
> >> > continues in this on/off mode
> >> >
> >> > 3. Pre-regulator out = 43V (between TP940 and TP950)
> >> >
> >> > 4. All voltages when the unit is stable for a few minutes
are
> >+8.6, -8.6,
> >> > +5.2, +100 are all ok.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > What are likely problems before I start ripping the
components from the
> >> > circuit?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ttesenq@... suggested
that
> >it
> >> could be the pre-regulator MOSFET
> >> > P9070.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I though that it could be a electrolytic cap but it doe not
look likely
> >> > because electrolytic failure would not have allowed the unit
to fire up
> >> for
> >> > a few minutes
> >> >
> >> > It is more likely a active component that weaken with
increase
> >> temperature,
> >> > so ttesenq@... could
be
> >right.
> >> >
> >> > This would mean Q947 and Q946 are also likely components
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Any other possible lead of similar experience.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
|