Yes, it is a 1 kHz square wave at 0.5 volts PP if I remember right. I use
the CG-5011 to do mine.
?
Ok, looking at the procedure, it wants 0.5 VPP @ 1kHz and 2 VPP @1 kHz.
Both square wave.
See the Cal-03 section.
?
Tom
?
?
?
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 12:01
PM
Subject: [TekScopes] Re: 2465B auto
measurment error
?
The SM lists A "standard amplitude signal generator" for setting the
triggers.
I have been using a function gen set to 60Hz with a sign
wave. The cal accepts the input and the triggers appear to bet set correctly
when the trigger is manually adjusted.
Is there a specific frequency
and or type of signal required for the the trigger cal?
B
--- In
TekScopes@...,
Jeff Machesky wrote:
>
> I would adjust the trigger and see if it
can reach the very edges of a
> sine wave. If it stops triggering
before the peaks then something is out
> of calibration or hopefully
not busted. Mine is off a little bit, but
> it's off by the same amount
that my mentioned test shows. It almost
> triggers to the peaks..but
not right to the edge. So my calculated
> reading is a bit low. In my
case I just need to rerun the trigger
> calibration and do a bit better
job. The Para-metrics are based on the
> trigger from what I've read
and then also have their own calibration for
> frequency.
>
> Jeff
>
> On 1/2/2013 7:17 PM, Tom Miller wrote:
>
>
> > Yes, I believe that is correct. Maybe pull the U500 and
clean the
> > contacts
> > carefully?
> >
>
> Does it do the same for all the channels?
> >
> > Do
you have or can get a spare U500?
> >
> > Tom
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff
Machesky" >
> > To: >
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02,
2013 8:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Re: 2465B auto measurment
error
> >
> > > Doesn't it use the trigger functions to
do the auto voltage measurements
> > > ? I thought it just
adjusted the trigger voltage up and down until it
> > > found the
peaks of where it could trigger and then just reported that
> > >
back.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> >
> On 1/2/2013 5:18 PM, Tom Miller wrote:
> > >>
> >
>> Did you try to re-do the vertical calibration? Can you look at
the
> > >> waveform during the measurement process to see if it
is loading the
> > >> input down?
> > >> Strange
one. Hope you find it.
> > >> Tom
> > >>
>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> *From:*
andersen_bill@...
> >
> > >>
> >
>
> >> *To:* TekScopes@...
> >
> >
> > >> *Sent:* Wednesday, January
02, 2013 6:58 PM
> > >> *Subject:* [TekScopes] Re: 2465B auto
measurment error
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>> Any ideas?
> > >>
> > >> B
> >
>> --- In TekScopes@...
> > >>
> >, "andersen_bill@"
> > >>
wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > I posted a few
months ago on this scope.
> > >> >
> > >>
> I was not able to get this resolved at the time and got busy on
>
> >> other projects.
> > >> >
> > >>
> I want to take a fresh look at it now.
> > >> >
>
> >> > Here is an example of what I am seeing.
> >
>> >
> > >> > Using a function generator with 50
ohm termination, frequency
> > >> set to .5 MHz, volts 4.0 peak
to peak- out of the function generator.
> > >> >
>
> >> > If sending a square wave the scope will auto measure
the
> > >> voltages corectly.
> > >>
>
> > >> > Example;
> > >> >
>
> >> > peak to peak 2.02 volts
> > >> > pos peak
1.01
> > >> > neg peak 1.01
> > >>
>
> > >> > If I change to a triang. wave. (frequency and
voltage the same)
> > >> the scope will now not measure the
voltages correctly.
> > >> >
> > >> >
Eample;
> > >> >
> > >> > peak to peak 1.1
volts
> > >> > pos peak .97 volts
> > >> >
neg peak .14 volts
> > >> >
> > >> > If I
measure manually using the cursers, they are correct.
> > >>
>
> > >> > I verified the trigger cal. and did a DC
balance.
> > >> >
> > >> > Please
help.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks, B
>
> >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> >
> >
>