¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Back to soldering ceramic terminal strips


 

No, WBT-800 definitely contains lead.



WBT-805 is the lead-free type.

Granted if you go through Parts Express, you do have to get by the
"full sonic potential" phrasing of their website.... (Cause you know
how important "sonic potential" is in your oscilloscope... :-) )

Parts Express has some cheaper 2% stuff, but IIRC, the 575 manual
specified 3% Ag solder, since 3% wasn't available, I figured 4% was
better than 2%. (It probably didn't matter much though.)

David

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, phosphorphile <gumbear@...> wrote:
I think that is the commonly available 96% tin, 4% silver solder like the stuff I have from Mouser, MG Chemicals cat. no. 4900-35G, "Lead Free Silver Solder," which is what I'm complaining about. ?Don't get me wrong, I can make serviceably good joints with the stuff, but when working on a joint that has been trashed by previous work just reflowing and adding this lead free solder doesn't work as well as the original tin-lead-silver solder. ?I hate scavenging the silver from the ceramic strip also. ?Maybe it is to be....



--- In TekScopes@..., David Holland <david.w.holland@...> wrote:



Is the stuff I used when restoring a 575, I don't recall any issues with it...

Twasn't cheap, but they're local to me..... its 4% Silver, and "leaded".


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.