Greetings;
--- In TekScopes@y..., dhuster@p... wrote:
I'll start a new thread since the 465M thing is getting a little
diluted with everything else ... I certainly haven't helped!
The only other scope that was almost as bad as the 434 was ....
what
else? The 432. Luckly, they didn't make as many of those.
My 212 is the most exasperating Tek item I own. I no longer have any
expectation of it working properly. My T932 has had to go back to
the 'scope doc twice for P/S probs (Wasn't there a delayed version if
these T900s also?). Looks tho' like I got off light compared to these
432/434 "gems".
The 434 made me thing that Tek should have the rule that all new-
hire
engineers, both electrical and mechanical, should have to work in a
service center for a couple of years before designing anything.
Dean
That, and hire a really good materials specialist to talk them out
of "time bomb" engineering choices. I.E., Delrin, plastic's answer to
pot metal.
Rgds; Steve
