Chuck Harris
SMD electrolytic capacitors are a tricky problem in several ways:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
First, they are easily damaged by the heat of the reflow oven, and solvents that may be used in cleaning flux,... though cleaning flux isn't done much if at all, on consumer grade equipment. Second, it is almost impossible to find out what was originally installed. There are no standardized markings to identify the manufacturer, or what grade capacitor was installed. Third, it is hard for a re-worker to find a complete spectrum of ESR values from which to select replacement capacitors. When you grab an assortment of SMD electrolytic capacitors off of ebay, you are unlikely to be able to match more than just the capacitance and voltage of the original. Never the ESR or lifetime rating. When you buy from Mouser, or DigiKey, you will find that cute little 20uf, 16V cap you need to replace, (because its ESR is 3 ohms while its cohorts are all 0.5 ohm), can only be had with ESR's of 0.7 ohm, 3 ohms, and 12 ohms! Replace the 0.5 ohm ESR caps with a 0.7 ohm cap, and you have taken the expected life of the cap and cut it in half (or more). Put in a 3 or 12 ohm version, and you will have improved nothing. Tricky indeed! -Chuck Harris Kevin Oconnor wrote: I have to agree with Chuck. Most test equipment with imbedded/integrated switchers are going to be very difficult to qualify parts if working. Their functionality can be extremely subtle. Blanket replacement of components will more likely cause additional reliability issues. |