It seems to me brightness change as a function of sweep velocity might be practical and take care of a lot of problems. I don't know if anything like that was ever offered in a scope.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Some TV sets have brightness stabilization to eliminate or reduce blooming. I think this is fairly common. I remember a very long time ago when some TV sets had automatic brightness control via the ambient light in the room. I don't know if I ever saw one in action and its off topic anyway. On 5/13/2018 8:53 PM, Ed Breya via Groups.Io wrote:
I think that auto-brightness functions could have been implemented on analog scopes, but only to a certain degree, and it would be quite complicated. The operating and signal conditions can be very broad, so you would have to take into account a lot of variables like sweep rate, signal repetition (trigger) rate, holdoff, delayed sweep operation, whether it's in X10 mag, the number of channels active, the chop vs alternate modes, single-sweep mode, and so on. And that's just for the X-axis. What about the overall deflection velocity and extent, which also depend on the arbitrary vertical signals? You would want to know the actual peak to peak deflection, the risetime or other frequency content information, and the position on-screen - for every applied input signal channel, and make judgement about which parts are to be at the "right" intensity. That's a lot of stuff to figure out for the convenience, versus the simple way of having the user set it for overall appearance preference for given conditions. From the advent of the oscilloscope, all of this would have been nice to have, but is not very practical. --
Richard Knoppow dickburk@... WB6KBL |