The firmware image I used doesn't use the FPLA, as it was captured by
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
reading out the contents of the board at board (rather than chip) level - BUT you stil lneed the patch ROMs as there is code in them that's used that isn't patches to the base ROMS. The ROM images are here: <> I just removed the FPLA and connected a jumper between two pins of the FPLA socket (no I can't remember which and the 7854 is inaccessible right now). Regards, David Partridge -----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] On Behalf Of David Sent: 19 January 2014 18:38 To: TekScopes@... Subject: Re: [TekScopes] RE: New (to me) 7854 scope On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 10:25:21 -0700, you wrote: On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:36 PM, <sbell@...> wrote:notorious Mostek parts? I opened it up expecting to find Mostek parts but found it used Motorola parts instead. The Tek part numbers (with Motorola part numbers in brackets) are 160-0408-01 (SCM92210P), 160-0409-01 (SCM92211P), 160-0410-01 (SCM92212P) and 160-0411-01 (SCM92213P). The date codes are all mid '83. checksum error? I left the discussion of the FPLA (FPRP?) to others since I am not sure what it could be replaced with and I believe with the right firmware image, the board can be modified to not use it. My understanding is that it was used to patch the mask ROMs with code stored in the 2716 EPROMs. Since the FPLA uses NiCr fuse PROM technology which is very different from the mask programmed Mostek ROMs, I have assumed it is more reliable. Incidentally, Signetics called the 82S107 a Field Programmable ROM Patch. It is obviously based on their 82S100 Field Programmable Logic Array but among other differences, the -CE input is replaced with a -Flag output so instead of responding to chip enable, it generates its own chip enable which is used to drive other chip enables. ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links |