I own a Phase II AXA sized post for my Atlas-Craftsman 12" and a Bostar AXA clone from CDCO that?is mounted on my?South Bend 9A.? Actually in my opinion, the Bostar is a better post with higher quality holders than the Phase II.? Both are Chinese sourced but the holders from Bostar fit both posts tighter with less slop than the Phase II holders and the Bostar post holds both brands of holders tighter.? A long time ago (2008-9) Bostar got some holders that had cheesy set screws that tended to strip which tarnished their?reputation somewhat but since about 2012 or so I haven't had any issues with Bostar products at all. Replacing the bad?screws?cost a couple of bucks?but wasn't?a big deal to?me.? ?I have since mounted a Bostar CXA on my South Bend 16".? I prefer the?Bostar holders since the?cost is about 25% of a Phase II.? I have a 0XA set to install on my Atlas-Craftsman 6x18 but haven't had the appropriate?round tuit recently. James Rice On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 2:02 PM Bill in OKC too via <wmrmeyers=[email protected]> wrote: True that, and why I generally say AXA-Clone. Partially because mine is a Chinese copy, and partially because the AXA-size is the one that fits 9-12" lathes, generally speaking. My school lathe that I love is a 13" Clausing Colchester, which has the BXA tool post, the other machines are 15" CC lathes, and they have CXA tool posts. The BXA I use is an Aloris, IIRC. They are very nice for some things. I'm also collecting tooling for the lantern-style tool posts, as there are some things they work better for. Best is to have both a QCTP of some sort, and the lantern style. Both will easily do some things the other cannot. If? you work production, you'll mostly want the QCTP. |