On Mar 5, 2025, at 12:46?PM, Dan Grossman via groups.io <ldg004@...> wrote:
Umm... Cuttyhunk is an island. That's
what's special about it.? Ferry runs twice per day.
On 3/5/2025 12:21 PM, Stephanie via
groups.io wrote:
Cuttyhunk sounds like a great place to visit even if I drive
there. ?All due respect, let’s keep the other options for
gathering in a separate thread. ?
thanks to those considering some organization to a herd of
cats!
--
Stephanie
Moderator
Sabre 36, #67
Formerly Sabre 28-2, #289
Wilson Harbor, NY Lake Ontario
Cuttyhunk sounds like a great place to visit even if I drive
there. ?All due respect, let’s keep the other options for
gathering in a separate thread. ?
thanks to those considering some organization to a herd of
cats!
--
Stephanie
Moderator
Sabre 36, #67
Formerly Sabre 28-2, #289
Wilson Harbor, NY Lake Ontario
On Mar 5, 2025, at 12:21?PM, Stephanie via groups.io <Shburgess1207@...> wrote:
Cuttyhunk sounds like a great place to visit even if I drive there. ?All due respect, let’s keep the other options for gathering in a separate thread. ?
thanks to those considering some organization to a herd of cats!
--
Stephanie
Moderator
Sabre 36, #67
Formerly Sabre 28-2, #289
Wilson Harbor, NY Lake Ontario
Cuttyhunk sounds like a great place to visit even if I drive there. ?All due respect, let’s keep the other options for gathering in a separate thread. ?
thanks to those considering some organization to a herd of cats!
--
Stephanie Moderator
Sabre 36, #67 Formerly Sabre 28-2, #289 Wilson Harbor, NY Lake Ontario
85 Sabre 32 pic (prior to cleaning and teak work finished) shows my four cowl vents.? I read in a prior recent post that you can clean (somehow) and paint these with Rustoleum spray paint.? I found the Rustoleum - time to remove the cowls.? One reference said they screw in? One said they just pop in and out?? Sure would like to know before I tear something up.? Can anyone inform me please?
Our teak eyebrows were too thin to retain the bungs as well. Common problem for a 30+ year old boat. I pulled them off, removed the screws and plugged the holes with teak bungs. They were then refinished and reattached with 3M automotive tape. Going on their third season with no issues.?
There are a few of things you can do, but note these are just ideas I have not done this on my boat:
?
First, you can use a polyurethane glue such as Gorilla Glue to glue in the bungs, that expands with moisture/humidity when curing and will fill in any gaps.
?
Second, you could use teak dust mixed with Titebond to glue the bungs into place. ?
?
Lastly, if you want something more easily removable, you could get colored wood trim caulk at Home Depot, Menards, Lowes, etc. and use that to either glue in the bung or simply fill in the hole. ?Won't be a perfect match but easy enough to remove in the future if desired. ?I just did something similar on wood trim in my house and it worked great, but that is not outdoors either so not sure how long that would hold up.
This is pretty common after being sanded down too many times.? The real solution is to replace the eyebrows, or just get rid of them.? If you do a search of the archives for eyebrow replacement there should be quite a few threads.? There's a Sabre drawing showing the (original) profile of the existing eyebrows.?? Not a minor project when all is said and done.?? You might possibly be able to counterbore the existing hole slightly deeper after removing the screws.? That would give you a little more depth for the bungs.? But I never tried that? - there just isn't a lot of wood left to work with.?
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:29?AM Kurtz via <Kurtz=[email protected]> wrote:
Some of the screw holes on my boat's teak eyebrows were too shallow for bungs.? I filled them with epoxy thickened with teak sawdust.? It's a little darker than the surrounding teak but looks pretty good.
Some of the screw holes on my boat's teak eyebrows were too shallow for bungs.? I filled them with epoxy thickened with teak sawdust.? It's a little darker than the surrounding teak but looks pretty good.
On Mar 2, 2025, at 6:11?PM, knightinnc via groups.io <Robertjohnknight@...> wrote:
?
My mounting screw hole on some of the finish work,? don't have enough meat around them for wooden bungs. What else can I use to "satisfactorily" seal the space above the screw heads?
?
<20250302_132541.jpg>
--
Robert s/v Valinor Sabre 34 Mark I #207 New Bern, NC
My mounting screw hole on some of the finish work,? don't have enough meat around them for wooden bungs. What else can I use to "satisfactorily" seal the space above the screw heads?
?
--
Robert s/v Valinor Sabre 34 Mark I #207 New Bern, NC
We would be interested if dates match our vacation dates. Late July/early August best fit for us. And, yes, the mooring field both outside and inside in Cuttyhunk Harbor may fill up fast, especially on week ends. That said, great idea.
On Mar 2, 2025, at 10:50?AM, David Lochner via groups.io <davelochner@...> wrote:
?Out of curiosity I took a look a 8 days of solar output by panel. The whole time the boat was in a slip facing more or less South. Port panels would get morning sun, but a bit limited by a large powerboat to the east. The radar pole is on the port side, which in this case is also the north side. The difference in out put for each panel is pretty negligible. With the starboard panel having a slight advantage, probably due to shading by the powerboat to port. Overall the differences amounted to about 2-3%. There was a couple of outliers that could be due to weather, since this is a retrospective study, I don’t have the climate data readily available.?
The panels are 2 150 watt Solar Panels with independent Victron controllers, mounted flat over the bimini. The data is from late February at about 31°N latitude. For most (all?) of the days we were living aboard.
Dave
Second Star
S362 #113
Fair Haven, NY/Lake Ontario
On Mar 2, 2025, at 12:04?PM, Randy Drummond via groups.io <SVReleaseMe@...> wrote:
Yes Everything Dave said. One reason I put another panel on the davits was to surround the radar poll. In the worst case scenario there are always at least two panels in full sun. When the radar dome covers a good portion of a panel it does cut it down a good bit. The back stays really are not noticeable. I have noticed during the middle of the day with high sun, the angle of the sun to the panel makes more of a deference than I would have thought. My two panels on the Bimini are angled slightly outboard and I can see a difference in output when the sun angle slightly favors one side or the other. This has lead me to believe that on average flat is better.?
On Mar 1, 2025, at 12:53?PM, David Lochner via groups.io <davelochner@...> wrote:
Tim,
This is where quality and good design come into play. A panel can be designed to be less affected by shading by how the cells are wired and the quality of the cells.
We have 2 150w Solara panels mounted over the bimini. The split backstay has little discernible effect on the power output. The radar pole has some effect, but I’ve never taken the time to figure out how much, too much work and too many variables to account for. When I look at the daily out put of both panels they are very close to being even. When planning the design expect to get about 3x the nominal output on average; a 100w panel will average 300wh of power. Again, better quality and more efficient panels will tend to do better. Earlier this week my panels were producing a little over 500wh of power each under clear blue skies at ~30° N in late February. In summer they have produced over 600 wh a day each. Total panel output will also depend on battery type and charge state. With LFP batteries the panels stay in the bulk stage for much longer. With LA batteries their output would go in absorption and put out less current.
Another advantage of higher quality panels is smaller size. The Solara’s were 3 or 4” narrower than similar panels from other brands.?
On Mar 1, 2025, at 11:32?AM, Tim Sowerby via groups.io <tim.sowerby2@...> wrote:
With a split backstay, is there a concern about shading from the stay itself? ? (There's also an issue with shade from pole mounted radar installations.)
?
I understand that some panels have substantially decreased output with very moderate shading whereas others are designed to be shade tolerant. ? ?In many ways the bimini seems like the best place to install flexible panels being out of the way and having less shade than the dodger. ? Considering the number of bimini installations out there, I'm beginning to think that shading from the backstay is more theoretical and real.
?
Perhaps those with split backstays and bimini might comment. ?Is backstay shading a valid concern? ?Are there specific panel arrangements i.e. four 50W panels with separate MPPT controllers vs two 100 W panels with a single controller preferable? ?Are there specific panel brands/models that are more shade tolerant. ?