开云体育

Thank you and hello to Brooks.? My personal feeling,? for whatever it is worth, is that I like having our S scale groups and conventions confined to S scale.I am reasonably annoyed when I search

Good points Brooks. I wonder what Ken Zieska would say? He’s been very active in the NMRA for well over a decade and has hosted a yearly modelers meet featuring S and other scales for a decade.

Jace,? there is no limit to the love for a litter of Dachshunds. Andrew

Since Jace brought up "TT", as an aside I would like to point out that Hornby is leading a resurgence of British

I wonder if a factor contributing to the level of acceptance of S by the broader modeling community through the years has been the tendency for S modelers to stay 'close to the fold' rather than

O scale seems to be doing OK so size isn’t much of a factor. Gilbert thrived until AC died and it dumped when quality dropped dramatically under the crooked new owner. AC’s son had no drive, no

The more surprising in that 00 used 4mm instead of the bizarre 3.5mm. North American TT largely went into decline because HP, its largest manufacturer and biggest booster, stopped making it; I don't

Bill without question.? ?Especially since his web site said "a South Jersey joint".? ?The other is Stan Strockroki.? ?Their YouTube videos inspired me tremendously. Andrew Parker

It is amazing that after all that expense there is any money left for gourmet food for the dachshunds. JGGK ________________________________ Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 4:35 PM To:

And why did HO grow and OO fade away?? ?And N blossom and TT die?? ? Stan

Sooo true Brian!

At least your mail is only getting delayed.? I ordered some of those beautiful Missouri Pacific and Texas & Pacific Eagle nose etchings from Mike Swederska and he mailed them two weeks ago.? He sent

I think it is mainly the layout limitations due to the scale.? Once HO became known and pretty reliable, there was no contest for those who didn't have much room for a layout.? And that was a lot

Wow. The ad and the adaganda reads as if S has a super bright future ahead of it. Seriously: What went awry with S? It IS a great size, there's no denying that... but WHY didn't it take hold and

I like model trains.? ??I like toy trains.??I make no differentiation other than that.??I find the rail height to be quite minor vs oversize couplers and way oversize accessories.?? Ted

OK Pete Silcox will give and wait for further instructions. [email protected]> wrote:

Brian, You make a good point here.? Thanks Bill. -- Ken Zieska 1/64th Scale Modeler

*RIGHT* BEAUTIFUL BUT DIFFICULT TO ASEMBLE. old Pete in Ga [email protected]> wrote:

Yes.? C-D seems to be first.? This is from the April 1937 Model Railroader: Another interesting entrance into S scale was Nord in this March 1945 ad in Model Railroader: I don't think you will

If not code 100(or even 83), then no good. John, As a Pennsy guy, I'm willing to go as high as 125! ? Jamie Bothwell Bethlehem, PA [email protected]> wrote: