Re: On topic (S scale railroad modeling)
|
If not code 100(or even 83), then no good.
John, As a Pennsy guy, I'm willing to go as high as 125!?? Jamie Bothwell Bethlehem, PA
Brooks Stover the poster child for that.
John,
There are some very good, published, S modelers that use track larger than Code 100.? I'm drawing a blank on names but a check in NASG Dispatch and Model Railroader (especially the S modeling issue in either 2023 or 2024) should yield the support you're looking
for.? Also, it's your railroad, build it the way you find most enjoyable.? Everyone else does.?
--Dave McBrayer
Auburn, CA
----------------
On 03/25/2025 1:28 PM, John Hutnick via wrote:
My solution is code 148 track and movable frog turnouts, which will then run everything.
In this group, since it is primarily scale, I sense a kind of in-built prejudice against hi-rail.? If not code 100(or even 83), then no good.
If there were never AF S gauge, we likely would not be here.? And no one has offerred any viable method that I have seen to convert later Lionel AF hirail scale steam to true scale.? I can't even get anyone to sell me basic conversion chassis kits for
Hudsons or K-5's.
--
Dave McBrayer
Auburn, CA?
|
