Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- RaspberryPi-4-HamRadio
- Messages
Search
Re: Connecting screen and fan to GPIO pins at same time
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýWas pondering that too. ?I think the fans will need to move to a separate power supply. ?I was considering a battery bank with multiple 5v outputs so one could go do the Pi and one to power the fans.
|
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
Mark Griffith
Forcing a ham operator into using *your* (meaning W3DS) concept of ham computing is just wrong.? (See the period at the end) Indeed, the spirit of open source is dying. Mark KD0QYN
On Thursday, July 9, 2020, 1:57:07 PM CDT, thegadget techie <gadgetechie@...> wrote:
well based upon your embedded caveat "You shall not alter, modify or remove the Software which installs BOINC and the Nagware Notice, or create a new installer for the Software with either of these two components removed." I'm purging your efforts, some implied remuneration?herein,? Sadly the spirit of open source is lost.?? good day On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:52 AM Dave Slotter, W3DJS <slotter@...> wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 04:17 PM, Cowan Bowman wrote: |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 02:57 PM, thegadget techie wrote:
some implied remuneration?hereinI charge no money, nothing, nada, zilch. I don't think asking for a postcard to remove a nag dialog is out of the question. What I wonder about is how petty a person can get that would complain about such a small thing? And if they choose not to send the postcard? Well, the nag dialog isn't going to prevent them from using the image. If people have issues running BOINC, I'm not such an unreasonable person that if they approached me directly that i wouldn't force them to run it. Not everyone has a fan on their setup. I get it. So if they approached me with a good reason to disable it, I would grant that request. But to take the choice away from me as the author of the creation is to strip away my rights that I worked hard for. It negates the six months of time I took to build the image and discourages me from sharing in the future. And my source code is open for inspection. Just because I have a custom license and not a boilerplate GPL or MIT license keeps it from being open source. Nothing in my license takes away existing GPL licenses. People are free to modify their GPL software. I think there's a lot of headache due to "armchair lawyers" not understanding the nuances of the law or the LICENSE as it pertains to the software image and misapplying their incorrect assumptions. ? -- - Dave ?? |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
well based upon your embedded caveat "You shall not alter, modify or remove the Software which installs BOINC and the Nagware Notice, or create a new installer for the Software with either of these two components removed." I'm purging your efforts, some implied remuneration?herein,? Sadly the spirit of open source is lost.?? good day On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:52 AM Dave Slotter, W3DJS <slotter@...> wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 04:17 PM, Cowan Bowman wrote: |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 01:26 PM, Cowan Bowman wrote:
No FUD about it. Things that may be suggested include:
? Not just FUD, but "sour grapes":
|
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
No FUD about it. All spoken from experience.? But you can keep going along the way you choose. Cowan N5QDH |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
These are typical Fear Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) arguments.
- Dave ?? |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
All depends on how the card usage is performed. Storage: Writing occasionally over most of the available storage space Operating system usage:? Writing over small area of the available storage space. So on systems that high usage where the swap space may be used continually over a small area will wear it out very quickly depending on the quality of your card. Cowan N5QDH |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
From the SD card association:
What is the service life of an SD memory card?
-- - Dave ?? |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýFolks, I suggest that you all treat this release very carefully. In my experience, at the best of times, PIs seem to wear out there SD cards PDQ. BINC is only going to make this worse. Dave ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dave Slotter, W3DJS
Sent: 09 July 2020 16:53 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [RaspberryPi-4-HamRadio] Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC) ? On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 04:17 PM, Cowan Bowman wrote:
Mr. Bowman, |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
Also,
No where in my posting of the thread, do I mention disabling it on HamPi.?? It is up to others how they interpret using the information. 73 Cowan N5QDH |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
However,
I don't use HamPi.? I install all from scratch as I like a clean system not full of fluff I don't use. But after several people, not just here complaining BOINC is making there installs render their Pi useless it is quite obvious BOINC is a mistake.? Especially for the Pi3 and earlier variants and disrupts other software like D-Rats when the system goes idle. 73 Cowan N5QDH |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
Mr. Wade:
I am not going to debate whether you agree or disagree with the LICENSE terms. They are what they are. If you don't agree with the LICENSE terms, then the answer is simple -- don't use HamPi. -- - Dave ?? |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
Dave Slotter,
GNU GPL supersedes your restriction without massive changes to Debian and BOINC code changes. I could have also posted the removal of your Nag message, but did not in respect to your so called license. 73 Cowan N5QDH |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýDave, Most of the software is covered by GPL and the GPL specifically prohibits such clauses. Any re-distribution of packages of GPL software must include the right to modify it. I you don¡¯t like that then don¡¯t distribute HamPi with GPL software included. Dave G4UGM ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dave Slotter, W3DJS
Sent: 09 July 2020 16:53 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [RaspberryPi-4-HamRadio] Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC) ? On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 04:17 PM, Cowan Bowman wrote:
Mr. Bowman, |
|
Locked
Re: HamPi on a 128GB SD-Card
I am running HamPi on both 128GB microSD cards and a 128GB SSD connected via USB 3.0.
In both instances, HamPi runs very well. -- - Dave ?? |
|
Locked
Re: Disabling Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC)
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 04:17 PM, Cowan Bowman wrote:
Mr. Bowman, Your suggested modification is in violation of the LICENSE for HamPi. The LICENSE specifically excludes the change you suggest. If you or others do not agree with running BOINC, then simply delete your copy of HamPi. I am not telling you what you can and cannot do with your own hardware. However, running HamPi with this modification is in violation with the LICENSE terms. I am not going to debate whether you agree or disagree with the LICENSE terms. They are what they are. If you don't agree with the LICENSE terms, then the answer is simple -- don't use HamPi. ? -- - Dave ?? |
|
Re: Hampi - what does it do?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 08:19 PM, Dana KN4BEV wrote:
There are some volunteers working on creating a wiki to answer questions about the image. Since it is a volunteer effort, its pace is proceeding as people have time to add to it. ? -- - Dave ?? |