开云体育

With the colonization movements after the late 15th century there are undoubtedly SNP that have developed here in the Americas for what would be considered a European in origin. The problem is

Roy, as a dedicated member of the R-U106 project (through my brother's test, with EKA in Germany) I am well aware of the problems Globetrekker has with testers from the continent which

There is no "refusal to admit" anything, just an awareness of what the models they are using are capable of given the data that users provide. Vince

As near as I can tell both Globe Trekker and scaledinnovation.com snp tracker refuse to admit anyone was born in North America developed a new terminal haplogroup despite accurate information.?

Brian, Iain, Some notions that spring to mind with regard to propelling the project forward. I met Skoglund when I visited the Reich lab back in 2014, and Reich sat in on the discussion. Probably too

Responses below. I've unexpectedly found myself a bit short of time for replies due to family misfortunes, so brief responses only I'm afraid. ? Kevin - thanks. Order of magnitude typo when copying.

Hi Iain This is a really impressive piece of work to be pulled together. I do remember that in September this year there was a 4-day Symposium at Heidelberg in Germany held under the auspices of

Let me give a further comment on this issue - as it is important and will continue to swirl around for the foreseeable future. At the bottom of any individual's STR results is this disclaimer posted

After reading the many comments to my post, I am inclined to agree with Brian that project administrators should be able to interpret a matching group's Y-DNA results and assign the common ancestor

That is a fascinating project, Belinda, and demonstrates what can be accomplished with a few motivated participants. I am curious to know what your thoughts are on the discrepancy between the

Sorry. Useless is the wrong word. Less useful than a complete record would be more exact. I am admin of the Stewart DNA Project, where we are lucky enough to be able to define royal Stewart

Hi Iain, If I am reading your pdf correctly, the number of R-U106 people in Ireland is greatly overstated at 1.55M. The population of Ireland is 5.262 M. Presuming half male, then the male population

Wayne, I agree—-your DNA fills the paper gap- it is who we are. Pervis [email protected]> wrote:

Dear all, ? I've updated the document I shared yesterday <https://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~mcdonald/genetics/phylogeography.pdf> with a new section looking at the origins of R-L151 in relation to ancient

I would not call establishing a solid genetic descendant relationship without a corresponding paper trail as "useless."? ?From a purist paper trail genealogical perspective useless may be

Hi folks, ? Thanks for the input. ? Brian - you'll remember that many of these changes were done in response to GDPR. Sadly, legal fears always trump reasonable requests, since a few bad actors

You need a complete paper trail, with no gaps, back to your Earliest Known Ancestor. Your DNA might show you are a match with a known individual (like King Robert II of Scotland, for example) but if

Joe, ?? To second what Vince said, you are inferring that your ancestry goes back to Wiltshire, but you only know that it goes back to Plymouth (if you have suitable DNA matches with roots there).

The “EKA” should be always be someone whose specific identity you can verify with documentary evidence. Vince

Iain, What would you rather have, what a paper trail says definitely or what your DNA matches tell you. My paper trail goes back to Plymouth, England but my DNA matches are with men with known