Re: Information Regarding FT209276
Doc, Unetice; were we EHG in the Mesolithic?
By
man
·
#7744
·
|
Re: Information Regarding FT209276
& don¡¯t let my idiosyncratic communication style discourage you; connect with me cousin; bridge the gap of science & history! Chapter 1: Pretentious Declaration of Information Not Useful to Most My
By
man
·
#7743
·
Edited
|
Re: Information Regarding FT209276
Wow, I¡¯ve been waiting 29 years for this moment. Personalty I¡¯ve always had an affinity with the Norman & Saxon culture but thought I was Celtic Irish. I¡¯ve come to learn much since then; so
By
man
·
#7741
·
|
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
Despite my facile comment I think this subject fascinating. Thanks Iain. wrote:
By
Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...>
·
#7740
·
|
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
I went for a walk over some of those deposits this morning. The effects on my particular part of eastern Scotland were very mild. The tsunami came from the north and it's not until you reach Shetland
By
Iain
·
#7739
·
|
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
Maybe this is the origin of the story later told by Plato and learned from priests in Ancient Egypt that relates to the destruction of Atlantis ¡°beyond the pillars of Hercules¡± (Gibraltar).
By
Dan D.
·
#7738
·
|
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
The original research paper that this news item is based on is here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jqs.3586 The newspaper headline is clearly meant to attract attention rather than
By
Mike Tryon
·
#7737
·
|
Re: Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
Fortunately I live on the top of a cliff.
By
Piero Sinclair <pierosinclair@...>
·
#7736
·
|
Mega tsunami with 65ft waves may have wiped out Stone Age populations in Britain | The Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/mega-tsunami-stone-age-britain-b2483031.html Dan D.
By
Dan D.
·
#7735
·
|
Re: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06865-0
Hi Rob, BAM files of these aDNA are available in the European Nucleotide Archives (ENA) database: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB64656 Among these aDNAs, NEO752 was yet analyzed by FTDNA
By
Ewenn
·
#7734
·
|
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06865-0
Wondering if anyone has tried to look more closely at the 6 R-P310 in Neolithic Denmark in this study? I don't if they Have Bam files. Would be interesting to know what their downstream haplogroups
By
Rob
·
#7733
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
There'd 5 of us now upgraded to the 111 level a few only at 67. At 37 level many matches we don't recognise as belonging to our surname. Will look at the next sale was 200 dollar. wrote:
By
jason jordan
·
#7732
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
Hi Jason, Being the first person in your Y-STR match set to upgrade can be very useful in terms of deeper ancestry, as it puts your group in a wider geographical context. For the people in your wider
By
Iain
·
#7731
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
@iain can I just clarify what you said above. If I upgrade to the big y I will be the first within my group to do so. I have been thinking about this for a while and probably will next sale. But you
By
jason jordan
·
#7730
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
Thanks for the answers. Ian as always professional and comprehensive, inspiring. Yes I am Croatian and It would be nice if I can contribute a little to the understanding of the history of that branch.
By
Dado
·
#7729
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
Thanks for the answers. I will upgrade to Big Y, looking forward to results!
By
Dado
·
#7728
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
Well, Speaking of the devil (ahem, vampire), ha-ha, my own BigY test result is slowly paying off. I used to get a match before with someone from Slovenia, but now I have a newer match, one branch
By
Dan D.
·
#7727
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
Another item to add to Iain's comment about southern and east European U106 individuals getting BigY results is that via the haplogroup branching one may be able to link back to a more northern or
By
Wayne
·
#7726
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
Hi Damir, Martin correctly describes your situation. I'll just add a few points. You may want to see this alternative visualisation from Family Tree DNA of what the family tree of R-BY5715 looks like:
By
Iain
·
#7725
·
|
Re: BigY - is it worth it?
Your YSeq results are quite impressive.? You now fall into a "so close, but so far" scenario. FTDNA prefers BY5715.? ?There are nine people.? There are two subclades of BY5715 and you could go 3
By
Martin Abrams
·
#7724
·
|