开云体育

Hi all, I attempted an analysis of LEU007, to check if it can really belongs to R-U106, and if possible to refine its haplogroup. LEU007 consists of several fastq files. I only analyzed the "YC1"

truly fascinating Based on combined lines of evidence, we observe that the kinship structure of the burial community was predominantly patrilineal/virilocal involving female exogamy.

Thanks, Found the sample at line 6 of excel table in the supplement. Hope to now find mention of sample in the body of the text.... I am not so practiced in the art of such things but I greatly

Hi, Only one aDNA in this study seems to belong to R-U106, named LEU007. This would be the 5th oldest R-U106+ aDNA recorded to date. Its fastq file has just been added to the European Nucleotide

I think it would be this one: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-54462-6 [email protected]> wrote:

I was unable to trace the "news blip" back to refereed journal article. If such exists, might someone provide the link ? ________________________________ Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 6:51 AM To:

They were only able to confirm it fell under U106. They used the 1240K assay rather than the more comprehensive (and more expensive) shotgun method. Ray wrote:

nice ! do you know the haplogroup!? -- KELL KOCH President Phone: 208-578-4806 kochson.com

Yes, it is possible for a Big Y result to appear in the Discover tool before it appears in the Block Tree and in the Big Y Match list. ? It sounds like this is the case for the "missing" R-BY153002

I have a BigY vs Discover discrepancy very near my Terminal SNP.? Its only one man, but it's?still bugging me.? This has been true for a few weeks now, so I doubt it's a case of one module catching

From Facebook R-U106 group today! -- Kevin Terry

Treasure-filled grave belonging to a teen girl and child unearthed after 1,300 years Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/article284039243.html#storylink=cpy

I would point out that this paper seems to have taken nearly 18 months to be accepted. [cid:image001.png@...] And I do wonder if you analyse populations to this level of detail - don't

https://allofus.nih.gov/news-events/announcements/275-million-new-genetic-variants-identified-nih-precision-medicine-data - Wayne K

I do apologize to the forum for this discussion as it's not pertinent. I blame Al for rising to my bait. Al, autosomal DNA is off topic. However as I'm a public spirited sort of chap, may I advise the

Oh dear, stop digging in the same hole. If you hadn't reminded us we might have started to forget your shame. But I suppose digging is in the blood. Peter

I've only just noticed this outrageously offensive comment from Peter. As a possible 25% Welshman I should point out my possible 25% Welsh ancestors were the backbone of our medieval miltary archers,

Hi all, For those interested, FTDNA recently added several R-U106+ aDNAs to its database. Below is some data on these latest additions: 1) R. Hui et al. 2024 (

And lots of 'itinerant' soldiers. For the British this must mean a generous 'contribution' has been made to foreign local populations over the past 300+ years. And the WW2 Americans left an estimated

Oh my God, Welsh! I'm so sorry.