开云体育

Hello, I haven’t been around in awhile. But I did want to let the group know that I have documented evidence and genealogy that proves my two paternal family names Monsees and Stejles (Stelges,

For informational disclosure to those who have added there data, I have implemented a more advanced Study (Project) system than the one discussed here in the past. All men who are test with SNPS at

Your modesty aside, I don't think that a paragraph for a Wikipedia article would be subject to the same rigorous review as an academic journal. Or at any rate the custodians would be more open to

Hi Roy, ? If I thought I could write something on the topic that would get past peer review, I would try! This is many steps below that, and it's not just references that are needed. A much more

PS. The Wikipedia article on L151 is lacking a reference for the text that mentions this phase of the migration (see below). Iain, why not make revision to the text based on your study, with

I suggest we wait until David Vance gets his feet under his new desk at FTDNA, and also until the 2nd edition of this book gets published, which should not be that far away into 2025, so I am

Hi Iain and friends, This updated version of your phylogeography study is a considerable advance and raises interesting questions, most notably the issue of whether CWC is a Baden culture mediated

That's an interesting point Joe - we have the Graves family association data as well which can push their DNA connections to a specific genealogy. While I don't have all of the paperwork since we're

Thank you very much for all the work you continue to put into this!

Ray's spreadsheet is a terrific resource. Perhaps a way can be found to automate updates with data from the Reich lab database.

Hi Ray The old Anthrogenica forum was essentially replaced last year by the new GenArchivist forum: https://genarchivist.net/ Jeremy

Hi Ray, Thanks for doing that. Much appreciated. Jamie Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ Sent: Friday, December 27, 2024 1:00:48 PM To:

I do try to place each sample as far down the tree as possible. I have moved the sample Jamie mentioned and cited a Discover.familytreedna page for the clade assignment. Not much work has been done

Hi Ed, ? Rather than re-analysing all the ancient DNA samples in detail, I've been relying on published data for broad assignments and Ray's spreadsheet for detailed calls. Published data tends to

Hi, Thanks for sharing the update. Just a question. When you add new individuals to the spreadsheet do you just add the data from the respective paper or what, for example, FTDNA might assign after

I have added these three individuals to my Ancient DNA spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rpJP0Bt4qUQb9wWBFA7i1tLPV75ie_qS0iplwvvlVmQ/edit?usp=sharing

Iain, Thanks for mentioning COL239 in your paper, as that is undoubtedly a huge find for those of us who fall below R-S3311 on the haplotree. I am hoping that the algorithm used for the Globetrekker

I can't wait!

Very interesting to see that Eske Willersev now seems to have dual assignments: 1. Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Center, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen 2. GeoGenetics Group,

Three interesting U106+ individuals here: ? CGG_2_022616 - early medieval (circa 700 AD) Italian, R-L48>L47>Z159 CGG_2_023745 - Bronze Age Spanish (circa 1550 BC, Cuesta del Negro, 37.33N 3.23W),