开云体育

Three interesting U106+ individuals here: ? CGG_2_022616 - early medieval (circa 700 AD) Italian, R-L48>L47>Z159 CGG_2_023745 - Bronze Age Spanish (circa 1550 BC, Cuesta del Negro, 37.33N 3.23W),

Hi Shane, ? R-FGC3861 doesn't have any ancient DNA until about 200 AD, so we can't use ancient DNA to understand the first few thousand years of its history. We instead will have to infer it from

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.12.02.626332v1 Dan D

Thank you Iain for this sneak peek. Do you have any theories into how FGC3861 might have fit into the major subclade migrations? Possibly part of the Z301 movement westward? Shane

Ditto. [email protected]> wrote:

Such a goof ball!!! Merry Christmas to everyone and a very Happy New Year. Linda Bucher Wheaton

Don't worry folks, I'll find the missing decimal. point. I'm good at this. [email protected]> wrote:

Hi Iain, In Table 1, the number of males with R-U106 DNA for NI, Scotland and Wales exceeds the male population in each of these countries. - A decimal point missing! -- Kevin Terry

Here's wishing you a safe journey across the stormy seas. I'm coping with my own bounding mains as I try to migrate to a new computer. When I have a moment I'll respond in more detail.Essentially, if

Dear all, ? I've updated my draft phylogeography document for R-U106 <https://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~mcdonald/genetics/phylogeography.pdf> . There is now a new section on the spread of R-U106 based on

Hi Joe It sounds as though your work is just a specialised sub-set of Adam Rutherford's book from around 2017 - and just goes to show that their own particular R1b-Haplogroup is important. A Brief

I would advise you that Susan Meates, who is DNA Advisor to the Guild of One-Name Studies in the UK, has just written an article about DNA Surname Project Administrators and is strongly advocating the

For my purpose the only thing Advanced permission is good for is getting the raw data from the less technical folks in a more secure manner than asking them to email me the token to the files. This

Managed to log in, always a good feeling. Iain and I have discussed these matters quite frequently through the years and we often disagree in a good-humoured way. It's not long ago he tried to

See also: https://youtu.be/W-uZvxKHO5E?si=FMUNj8oonYC6t2Yj

Let's see if this PCA from MyTrueAncestry for PNL002 (PNL001 is missing) can be transmitted.

Iain, I just spent a couple of hours working on a reply but it vanished into the cybersphere when I hit a forbidden key. Perhaps I'll try again tomorrow. Too tired now. Roy

Iain, all U-106 matters aside, I hope that your family "misfortunes" are not too serious or long-lasting. Happy Holidays to you, your family and to everyone at U-106! -- GaryM.

Project administrators did previously have the ability to change the EKA information for their project members. If I recall correctly, this ability was removed when all the GDPR changes were brought

Belinda, On the other hand, a model that did NOT suggest any "there and back" migrations would be even more suspicious. After all, we know very well that people were moving "back and forth" across