开云体育

In her book Viking Kings of Britain and Ireland: The Dynasty of Ivarr to A.D. 1014 , I believe that Claire Downham explains that the Irish Sea Vikings used the Clyde as a cross country shortcut for

Found on the U106 Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/114790035253185/?multi_permalinks=7368631513202298&notif_id=1711017087529478&notif_t=group_activity&ref=notif He is specifically

Interesting read, thanks. It’s funny to see an Icelandic author part of a study referring to part of Norway as “isolated”. Hard to wrap my head around that one… :) The results show some

Hi All, Perhaps the most noteworthy revelation in this study is the conjectured back migration following the initial Migration period, when, e.g., the Langobards moved out of Southern Scandinavia.

Been meaning to do it a while now and a cousin had a story of someone breaking a Brick wall with a slight variation of a surname change. Only 3 weeks last upgrade can't wait for the results even if it

Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant | Nature<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06035-2> * Article * Open

I just wanted to note here the following point. I wish to refer to the 17 May 2021 study: Mattingsdal, M., Ebenesersdóttir, S.S., Moore, K.H.S. et al. The genetic structure of Norway. Eur J Hum Genet

I have quickly scanned the paper and the one item I did not see was whether they used the 1240K set to derive results or if they used the shotgun sequencing (which is more expensive, but yields fuller

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/19/style/roman-statue-parking-lot-intl-scn-scli/index.html

Dear Raymond, Thank you for your work listing ancient DNA from u106. I was at least briefly excited to see and entry for FGC 3861>FGC14877 only 58 miles away from my earliest male line ancestor who

Yes, the samples that have been crossed out are samples found to fall outside of U106 Ray

Hi Ray, On your spreadsheet you had a couple graves from the Gretzinger study listed as FGC11784>S6881 and further downstream, however they've a line through them. Is this due to further analysis

Thank you very much Ray for noting this and for updating your spreadsheet.? Crossing my fingers on a couple of the Z7 samples. I thought you missed a Z7

There are several very old Z18 individuals in this paper, with five of them dated to roughly 2000 BCE. Once the raw data becomes available, these individuals bear a closer look, to see whether they

Hi folks, There are some interesting results here for us. Whether fortunate or not, there's nothing immediately ground-breaking that leaps out at me - that's good, because it means the new results

Hi Ray, all, Thank you Ray for sharing such a promising paper (with R-U106+ aDNAs in poorly documented countries like France...). It seems to me that BAM/fastq files are not (yet) available. It is

Ray et al: I see that I (FTDNA kit 246858 U106/L44) match your entry on line 365 for WPK005 (also U106/L44) . All comments and insights welcome. Richard W Youatt FTDNA Kit 246858 Sent: Friday, March

One of the individuals (CGG106838) from Kaarebjerg Agre, T?rslev Hage, Gerlev Sogn, Zealand, Denmark dates back to just before the RISE98 individual. This new individual falls under

Raymond,HADO18 was not U106>Y19781. He was L21. Ciarán

here wrote: