开云体育

Wondering if anyone has tried to look more closely at the 6 R-P310 in Neolithic Denmark in this study? I don't if they Have Bam files. Would be interesting to know what their downstream haplogroups

There'd 5 of us now upgraded to the 111 level a few only at 67. At 37 level many matches we don't recognise as belonging to our surname. Will look at the next sale was 200 dollar. wrote:

Hi Jason, Being the first person in your Y-STR match set to upgrade can be very useful in terms of deeper ancestry, as it puts your group in a wider geographical context. For the people in your wider

@iain can I just clarify what you said above. If I upgrade to the big y I will be the first within my group to do so. I have been thinking about this for a while and probably will next sale. But you

Thanks for the answers. Ian as always professional and comprehensive, inspiring. Yes I am Croatian and It would be nice if I can contribute a little to the understanding of the history of that branch.

Thanks for the answers. I will upgrade to Big Y, looking forward to results!

Well, Speaking of the devil (ahem, vampire), ha-ha, my own BigY test result is slowly paying off. I used to get a match before with someone from Slovenia, but now I have a newer match, one branch

Another item to add to Iain's comment about southern and east European U106 individuals getting BigY results is that via the haplogroup branching one may be able to link back to a more northern or

Hi Damir, Martin correctly describes your situation. I'll just add a few points. You may want to see this alternative visualisation from Family Tree DNA of what the family tree of R-BY5715 looks like:

Your YSeq results are quite impressive.? You now fall into a "so close, but so far" scenario. FTDNA prefers BY5715.? ?There are nine people.? There are two subclades of BY5715 and you could go 3

Cheers, I need advice. Some time ago I did a Yseq test ( R1b-U106 Superclade Panel ) and got the final haplogroup FGC18842-S21728- BY5719 which I see, is the same as BY5716. I also did a Y-37 Ftdna

Thank you, Iain! Very much appreciated and very helpful! My family are the Sinclairs from Orkney, related to the Rosslyn Chapel and the Balfours.

There are two places you can find out information about what Family Tree DNA holds about a haplogroup. These are the public haplotree and their Discover project:

I am paternal (Y) R-L45. I was born and currently live IN SCOTLAND of both mainland Scottish men and ORCADIAN (i.e. PICTS + VIking/Norwegian) men from Westray, Orkney.? Our family is still there and

Scientists crack mystery of how MS gene spread The DNA of ancient cattle herders has revealed how diseases evolved in Europe over thousands of years. Read in BBC News:

Hi Ray, all, The question of the reliability of SNP test results is certainly a crucial point, especially since these tests constitute more than half of R-U106+ tests in the FTDNA's database. FTDNA

I would like to second what Raymond said. When I imported my Genographic 2.0 results into FTDNA (in 2016), my Y-SNP tree was littered with false positives outside of my branch. I also suspect that

The chip-based testing all autosomal tests rely upon is not perfect. False positives and false negatives are known to occur within these tests. I don't remember off-hand how high this error rate is,

Thanks Iain. I have linked them all to my FTDNA tree, as painful as that tree is to work with. I'll see what I can do about getting them to upload VCF files but many of them haven't even given me

Hi Mike, Thank you very much for the summary. It's good to hear to hear about the times when people are successful - these case studies both give ideas to others, and help those of us working at