Re: QSI 700 series cameras in stock and available now.
Thanks Peter,
The OAG will be the same for the 726 model.
The new ASCOM driver is the best way to connect in Maxim DL, the ASCOM properties box contains the gain and offset setting, they can be set without disconnecting the camera and allowing access to the setting with older versions of software.
Thanks.
|
Re: QSI 700 series cameras in stock and available now.
That's interesting, earlier info didn't mention the built in OAG unit, hopefully also available on the 726. Good to know.
Will the existing Maxim DL native driver work with this camera?
Cheers,
Peter
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W (Northumberland, UK)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 03/07/2024 11:42, QSI Imaging via groups.io wrote: Hello Zack,
Thanks for the reply, I have attached a technical drawing of the 760 7 position camera. The 726 has a slightly smaller filter wheel housing dimension.
We are providing an ASCOM / APLACA driver for the camera and are planning on a native driver for NINA.
The existing SkyX native driver will work with the new cameras.
Thanks
QSI team.
|
Re: QSI 700 series cameras in stock and available now.
Hello Zack,
Thanks for the reply, I have attached a technical drawing of the 760 7 position camera. The 726 has a slightly smaller filter wheel housing dimension.
We are providing an ASCOM / APLACA driver for the camera and are planning on a native driver for NINA.
The existing SkyX native driver will work with the new cameras.
Thanks
QSI team.
|
This is an image of Arp 188, the Tadpole Galaxy, a highly distorted spiral galaxy in Draco about 400M light-years away. ?The striking "tail" is a stream of gas and new stars that is about 280K light-years long. ?This tail is believed to have been caused by a tidal interaction between Arp 188 and a smaller galaxy that closely approached it. ?This interloper galaxy can be seen shining through the disk of its larger companion - it's the small, oblate, blueish object at the 5:00 position relative to the center of Arp 188. ?Models show that this galaxy probably crossed in front of Arp 188, then orbited around it and now resides about 300K light-years behind it. ?The field is littered with very distant background galaxies, many of which appear distorted or interacting. ?A Hubble image of a small sky area immediately surrounding Arp 188 revealed over 6000 such galaxies.? The rendition shown here is heavily cropped in order to highlight some of the structural detail in the target.
The image was captured during 6 nights in June 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 16 hours.
Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.
|
Re: QSI 700 series cameras in stock and available now.
do you have any more detailed information on these cameras such as physical/mechanical dimensions and information on the tilt adjustment mechanisms you have said it has??
Will you be creating a native driver for NINA??
Will the existing native drivers for TheSkyX and other software work with this camera??
|
QSI 700 series cameras in stock and available now.
Hello all,
We are very happy to say the first sales of the QSI 700 series camera are going well! Cameras are going out to magazines for reviews and articles will be published soon.
In the meantime, our very own Rui Tripa has conducted an internal review of the camera from his observatory in Portugal.
The review has been uploaded to our website for those interested.
?
Thanks for reading,
The QSI team.
|
?????. ? ??? 2? ?? ??? ?? ? ??? ?????. ?????? ??? 10? ?? ??????. ???? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??? ?? ????????. ??? ??? ?? ???? ??? ??? ?????. ? "??? X ??"? 4250?? ???? ???? ??? ??????.  If anyone knows how to modify the camera x size value, I would appreciate some help.
|
|
|
Beautiful image of this nice edge on galaxy, Bruce!
best,
Bernhard Hubl
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] < [email protected]> On Behalf Of Geof Lewis Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 3:14 AM To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [QSI-CCD] NGC 4157 image ?
NGC 4157 is a nearly edge-on spiral galaxy in Ursa Major, located about 55M light-years away. ?Based on its apparent size and distance, its disk is about 125K light-years in diameter, which makes the galaxy somewhat larger than our Milky Way galaxy. Although NGC 4157 is quite photogenic, it seems to get little attention from amateur imagers or, for that matter, professional astronomers. ?The surrounding background in the image has many distant galaxies including some galaxy clusters at distances of 3-5B light-years.
The image was captured during 6 nights in May 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 18.3 hours.
Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.
|
Bruce,
That's gorgeous.
Geof
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
NGC 4157 is a nearly edge-on spiral galaxy in Ursa Major, located about 55M light-years away. ?Based on its apparent size and distance, its disk is about 125K light-years in diameter, which makes the galaxy somewhat larger than our Milky Way galaxy. Although
NGC 4157 is quite photogenic, it seems to get little attention from amateur imagers or, for that matter, professional astronomers. ?The surrounding background in the image has many distant galaxies including some galaxy clusters at distances of 3-5B light-years.
The image was captured during 6 nights in May 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 18.3 hours.
Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.
|
NGC 4157 is a nearly edge-on spiral galaxy in Ursa Major, located about 55M light-years away. ?Based on its apparent size and distance, its disk is about 125K light-years in diameter, which makes the galaxy somewhat larger than our Milky Way galaxy. Although NGC 4157 is quite photogenic, it seems to get little attention from amateur imagers or, for that matter, professional astronomers. ?The surrounding background in the image has many distant galaxies including some galaxy clusters at distances of 3-5B light-years.
The image was captured during 6 nights in May 2024 from SkyPi Remote Observatory using a 12.5" PlaneWave scope and a QSI-640ws camera at f/8 for a final LRGB integration of 18.3 hours.
Thanks for looking,
Bruce W.
|
Meaanwhile it works anyway, great!!
Von meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet
-------- Urspr¨¹ngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Rainer <rsfoto@...> Datum: 08.06.24 20:40 (GMT+01:00) Betreff: Re: [QSI-CCD] NINA and QSI cameras
No idea. I did no say there is a 32bit version
|
No idea. I did no say there is a 32bit version
|
Moving on,
The Lycander webcam arrived today, and is actually pretty good, in
fact very good for the price, a nice crisp image with good colour.
The lens does unscrew, but it proved necessary to dismantle the
camera to fully remove it. Just two little screws as you can see.
That exposed the screw thread which is 12 mm, so my adapter fitted
ok. Unfortunately the lens holder is too far back for my adapter,
but I've scaled the Amazon one from a screenshot and you can see the
approximate sizes. Photo attached below
The distance from the front cover of the camera to the threaded lens
holder is 8.3 mm, so the Amazon adapter will easily fit with the
front cover in place. The clip arrangement can also be easily
removed by prising up the little cover on the hinge to expose a
small screw.
It self installed under both Windows7 and Windows XP, and works fine
with Metaguide (although monochrome) and Sharpcap. This version of
course is 720p so 1280 x 720. But there is also a 1080p version
shown on Amazon (1920 x 1080) for ?25. ? IF that has a larger chip
as the pixel count suggests, it might make a pretty good Lunar
camera.? Perhaps I will give mine a go anyway, even though it
wouldn't have the front cover on.
Here are the links again:
Camera?
Adapter ?
Cheers,
Peter.
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W (Northumberland, UK)
On 06/06/2024 10:56, Peter Vasey via
groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi
Nicola,
Why is using the full image train crucial?? I only use Metaguide
for collimation, and simply replace my QSI 683 with a webcam or
the Altair camera that works.? Perhaps you are saying that other
items in your image train effect the collimation, so you are
trying to compensate for that?
But that could create its own problems, surely it's better to have
the main instrument properly collimated, then make sure the
downstream items are in line and at right angles to the telescope
axis, perhaps by using screwed adapters.
Incidentally I've ordered the Lycander 720P webcam for a bit of
fun - hardly breaking the Bank at ?14.26 ;-)? It will arrive
tomorrow, and I'll see what it's like for modifying - I already
have a 12mm thread eyepiece adapter on my venerable Toucam, but of
course that camera doesn't work with Windows7 upwards (I use XP in
my Observatory), and I'd need to reflash it and use a different
driver - can't be bothered to go through all that and maybe ruin
it completely!
Cheers,
Peter.
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
On 06/06/2024 10:18, Pico de Paperis via groups.io wrote:
As I'd like to use Metaguide for
collimation, it is crucial to have the full image train set up,
therefore there can't be any webcam in the image train. This is
why I was wondering if there was any chance to use it
straight?away with my QSI.
Cheers
Nicola
Il giorno gio 6 giu 2024 alle ore 02:42 Peter Vasey via
groups.io
<petevasey@...
<mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:
??? Just to add to the below, obviously I don't have this next
camera, but
??? if it does have the ribbing round the lens shown in the
image, the lens
??? might unscrew so save having to take the camera apart:
???
??? And it's cheaper!
??? Peter
???
??? Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
??? On 06/06/2024 00:47, Peter Vasey via groups.io
wrote:
???? > Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide?? It's
not really
???? > intended as a video camera.
???? >
???? > The most economical solution is a basic webcam with
the lens
??? replaced by
???? > an eyepiece adapter.? Also some (but not all)
guide/imaging
??? cameras will
???? > work with Metaguide.? My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but
not my
??? GPCAM3 178M.
???? >
???? > This video might help, showing how to convert a
Logitech C270 webcam:
???? >
???? >
???
???? >
???? > Camera:
???? >
???
???? >
???? > Adapter:
???? >
???
???? >
???? > I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with
a bit of
???? > ingenuity!? Might even have a 12mm thread.
???? >
???? > Cheers,
???? >
???? > Peter
???? >
???? >
???? > Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
???? >
???? > On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via groups.io
??? wrote:
???? >> Hello QSIers,
???? >>
???? >> do you know if it is possible to use Windows
DirectShow with a
??? QSI683wsg?
???? >> Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
???? >>
???? >> Thanks!
???? >> Nicola
???? >>
???? >
???? >
???? >
???? >
???? >
--?
Nicola
Sky Monsters -
|
Hi Nicola,
Why is using the full image train crucial? I only use Metaguide for collimation, and simply replace my QSI 683 with a webcam or the Altair camera that works. Perhaps you are saying that other items in your image train effect the collimation, so you are trying to compensate for that?
But that could create its own problems, surely it's better to have the main instrument properly collimated, then make sure the downstream items are in line and at right angles to the telescope axis, perhaps by using screwed adapters.
Incidentally I've ordered the Lycander 720P webcam for a bit of fun - hardly breaking the Bank at ?14.26 ;-) It will arrive tomorrow, and I'll see what it's like for modifying - I already have a 12mm thread eyepiece adapter on my venerable Toucam, but of course that camera doesn't work with Windows7 upwards (I use XP in my Observatory), and I'd need to reflash it and use a different driver - can't be bothered to go through all that and maybe ruin it completely!
Cheers,
Peter.
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W (Northumberland, UK)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 06/06/2024 10:18, Pico de Paperis via groups.io wrote: As I'd like to use Metaguide for collimation, it is crucial to have the full image train set up, therefore there can't be any webcam in the image train. This is why I was wondering if there was any chance to use it straight?away with my QSI.
Cheers
Nicola
Il giorno gio 6 giu 2024 alle ore 02:42 Peter Vasey via groups.io <> <petevasey@... <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:
Just to add to the below, obviously I don't have this next camera, but
if it does have the ribbing round the lens shown in the image, the lens
might unscrew so save having to take the camera apart:
<>
And it's cheaper!
Peter
<>
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
On 06/06/2024 00:47, Peter Vasey via groups.io <> wrote:
> Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide?? It's not really
> intended as a video camera.
>
> The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens
replaced by
> an eyepiece adapter.? Also some (but not all) guide/imaging
cameras will
> work with Metaguide.? My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but not my
GPCAM3 178M.
>
> This video might help, showing how to convert a Logitech C270 webcam:
>
>
<>
>
> Camera:
>
<>
>
> Adapter:
>
<>
>
> I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with a bit of
> ingenuity!? Might even have a 12mm thread.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
> <>
> Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
>
> On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via groups.io
<> wrote:
>> Hello QSIers,
>>
>> do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a
QSI683wsg?
>> Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Nicola
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Nicola
Sky Monsters - <>
|
As I'd like to use Metaguide for collimation, it is crucial to have the full image train set up, therefore there can't be any webcam in the image train. This is why I was wondering if there was any chance to use it straight?away with my QSI.
Il giorno gio 6 giu 2024 alle ore 02:42 Peter Vasey via <petevasey= [email protected]> ha scritto: Just to add to the below, obviously I don't have this next camera, but
if it does have the ribbing round the lens shown in the image, the lens
might unscrew so save having to take the camera apart:
And it's cheaper!
Peter
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
On 06/06/2024 00:47, Peter Vasey via wrote:
> Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide?? It's not really
> intended as a video camera.
>
> The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens replaced by
> an eyepiece adapter.? Also some (but not all) guide/imaging cameras will
> work with Metaguide.? My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but not my GPCAM3 178M.
>
> This video might help, showing how to convert a Logitech C270 webcam:
>
>
>
> Camera:
>
>
> Adapter:
>
>
> I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with a bit of
> ingenuity!? Might even have a 12mm thread.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
>
> Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
>
> On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via wrote:
>> Hello QSIers,
>>
>> do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a QSI683wsg?
>> Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Nicola
>>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Just to add to the below, obviously I don't have this next camera, but if it does have the ribbing round the lens shown in the image, the lens might unscrew so save having to take the camera apart:
And it's cheaper!
Peter
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W (Northumberland, UK)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 06/06/2024 00:47, Peter Vasey via groups.io wrote: Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide?? It's not really intended as a video camera.
The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens replaced by an eyepiece adapter.? Also some (but not all) guide/imaging cameras will work with Metaguide.? My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but not my GPCAM3 178M.
This video might help, showing how to convert a Logitech C270 webcam:
Camera:
Adapter:
I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with a bit of ingenuity!? Might even have a 12mm thread.
Cheers,
Peter
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W? (Northumberland, UK)
On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via groups.io wrote:
Hello QSIers,
do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a QSI683wsg?
Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
Thanks!
Nicola
|
Why do you want to use your QSI with Metaguide? It's not really intended as a video camera.
The most economical solution is a basic webcam with the lens replaced by an eyepiece adapter. Also some (but not all) guide/imaging cameras will work with Metaguide. My Altair GPCAM2 224C is ok, but not my GPCAM3 178M.
This video might help, showing how to convert a Logitech C270 webcam:
Camera:
Adapter:
I expect even cheaper webcams could be converted with a bit of ingenuity! Might even have a 12mm thread.
Cheers,
Peter
Approx. 55 deg N, 2 deg W (Northumberland, UK)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 05/06/2024 11:23, Pico de Paperis via groups.io wrote: Hello QSIers,
do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a QSI683wsg?
Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
Thanks!
Nicola
|
Hello QSIers,
do you know if it is possible to use Windows DirectShow with a QSI683wsg? Would like to use Metaguide to collimate....
Thanks! Nicola
|
Geof Lewis
Pico de Paperis