开云体育

You might try Dale, WC7S. He can be contacted at daleputnam@.... He has done kit building for our customers, many times. ken - wa4mnt

David, Yes WSPR is the obvious choice. It seems to me that many of the other mode "grabbers" are to alert users that a QSO with a spotted station is possible rather than just to test propagation? 73

I asked Giulio IK2DED this question for youtube, but there is no answer yet. I will do the experiment myself.

Hi Andy I would suggest try 400 and 600Hz for the audio phase shift adjustment. If you left it at 800Hz it would not be bad, either... I do not know really the answer to this and I have not tried it

yes Hans, I know that need to change R according to the table from ke7xr. thus, menu items 3.8; 4.8; 8.2 i make 500 Hz. and menu items 8.3 Phase adj Lo freq: audio freq forlow audio phase adj

Hi Andy You need to change the hardware, to change the CW filter center frequency, see http://qrp-labs.com/qcx/qcxmods.html#cwcenter And also then change the menu settings as well. Each menu setting

Hi Ernie, I'm not sure what times Jim uses Opera, but I'm on 40-meters now, transmitting a beacon periodically. To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 4:33 AM Subject: Re: [QRPLabs]

Jim- What nights and band/freq are you on Opera2? Would like to try to spot you. 73 Ernie KC4SIT Sent from my iPhone

Jan, I know all about those very tiny lost tracks fiddling with T1. Glad you were able to repair! Your earphone jack may be shorting to ground (Know issues). Try removing the electrolytic just

Hi all! gentlemens, I want to change the center frequency of the CW filter. I can not understand whether I need to change menu items 3.8; 4.8; 8.2; 8.3; 8.4??because by default they are made for a

I don't know if this applies to any kits or just those from this company, but it wouldn't hurt to ask. DZKit - Support | | | | | | | | | | | DZKit - Support Over the

Does anyone here who builds kits or know of anyone who does? 73 Ernie KC4SIT kc4sit@...

Not sure what your saying.The quote was from my post saying ,why not have FT8 beacon for U3S? JT9 has fewer spotters as does many other modes that came and gone...so yes,FT8 in the U3S is a good idea

Hew VA7HU wrote... Mine are for 80M and 40M, so I won't have a QCX there, but I could dial my "big rig" down to 5W. We might be a bit close for 20M though. Of course, that's assuming you can send

Precisely my point! The more coverage you have, the more it represents the prevailing propagation.? Likewise the faster reporting.

It's useful because there are *vastly* more people receiving/reporting the FT8 signals and therefore giving a more realistic picture of the prevailing propagation on PSKR and other sites.? Fast or

Thanks Daniel and John got it! Terry? w6leo

Hello ALL?? ~ I've been debugging my # 899 = QCX-80M for the last couple of weeks (off and on) for there is more to living than assembling a kit when you are 80?? HI LOST some PCB tracess with

Oh my!? Soon the QCX will have more Functionality than the Swiss Army Knife. ... and to think it started as a compact CW transceiver. I'm going to stay Tuned. -Bob KQ2Q