¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

Eh...As long as we are throwing out druthers, I'd rather see a multi-band QCX+ or QCX-mini than have SSB.?


Re: QCX + (20) Winding Wires

 

I'm not trying to be ungrateful, but a reply without an answer is wholly unhelpful.
--
Kevin
AD0IM


Re: QCX + (20) Winding Wires

 

I'm not trying to be a smartalek here, but have you downloaded the manual and read it? Not far into the manual is a inventory that should answer that/those question(s). Before beginning a project like this, it is good to look through the whole thing to get a feel for how it needs to go together in the steps outlined.


Re: Coffee Cup

 

Thanks for the heads up! It's hand wash only for me!

Roy
WA0YMH?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, 5:50 PM Jim <Jscook@...> wrote:
Don¡¯t put your QRP-Labs coffee cup in the dishwasher!! ? The paint runs and it looks like a QDX with fried finals. ? Grin.? Still performs it¡¯s duties just fine.

jim
W3APC


Coffee Cup

 

Don¡¯t put your QRP-Labs coffee cup in the dishwasher!! ? The paint runs and it looks like a QDX with fried finals. ? Grin. ?Still performs it¡¯s duties just fine.

jim
W3APC


QCX + (20) Winding Wires

 

I received my kit yesterday and was eager to unpack and inventory the components. I did not however, stop long enough to consider which bundle of wire is used for which toroids. One appears to have more wire than the other but I can't be certain, or does it matter?

Also, I noticed that some of the capacitor labels begin "BC" and am curious if those are the same value than similarly labeled items without the "BC."

I'm very excited about this kit.

Thanks.

Kevin
AD0IM


Re: BS170 Specs

 

https://www.ntepartsdirect.com/ENG/PRODUCT/BS170?gclid=Cj0KCQjwxveXBhDDARIsAI0Q0x1avrhQBxbhEoTW2PvAGQeCXuP69_TqbrcEOhID_4FwCr3bV3Dx9l8aAih9EALw_wcB

https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/nte-electronics-inc/BS170/11652630

Digi-Key Part Number
2368-BS170-ND
?
Manufacturer


Charles Brown N4SO


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

My bad, sorry, I was misinformed.

John




On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 03:16:09 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Oops...wrong key:


Their product spec says:





On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:40:48 PM EDT, KK4ITX John via groups.io <jleahy00@...> wrote:


IC-705, not quite yet......... 2m & 70cm ?



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:28:34 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


IC-705?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:22:56 PM EDT, KK4ITX John via groups.io <jleahy00@...> wrote:


Strange how an old platform like the FT-817 STILL does not have any real competitors, after all this time.

John
'KK4ITX



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:52:42 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Shirley:

You're right about the T41-EP. However, a smaller display, half the power output, tri-band, and putting things on one board might get it small enough to be a possibility. I actually like the G90, and ran it at 15W on SSB during Field Day and made a lot of contacts with a marginal antenna. But for hunt-and-pounce operation that is so common for QRP'ers, the G90 display just presents too small of a spectrum slice.

I hope someone does try to reduce the nano-acres of the T41-EP so it can be used for SOTA, IOTA, POTA, etc.

Jack, W8TEE

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:42:02 PM EDT, Shirley Dulcey KE1L <mark@...> wrote:


Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:
I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

Oops...wrong key:


Their product spec says:





On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:40:48 PM EDT, KK4ITX John via groups.io <jleahy00@...> wrote:


IC-705, not quite yet......... 2m & 70cm ?



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:28:34 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


IC-705?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:22:56 PM EDT, KK4ITX John via groups.io <jleahy00@...> wrote:


Strange how an old platform like the FT-817 STILL does not have any real competitors, after all this time.

John
'KK4ITX



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:52:42 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Shirley:

You're right about the T41-EP. However, a smaller display, half the power output, tri-band, and putting things on one board might get it small enough to be a possibility. I actually like the G90, and ran it at 15W on SSB during Field Day and made a lot of contacts with a marginal antenna. But for hunt-and-pounce operation that is so common for QRP'ers, the G90 display just presents too small of a spectrum slice.

I hope someone does try to reduce the nano-acres of the T41-EP so it can be used for SOTA, IOTA, POTA, etc.

Jack, W8TEE

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:42:02 PM EDT, Shirley Dulcey KE1L <mark@...> wrote:


Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:
I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

Their product spec says:


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:40:48 PM EDT, KK4ITX John via groups.io <jleahy00@...> wrote:


IC-705, not quite yet......... 2m & 70cm ?



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:28:34 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


IC-705?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:22:56 PM EDT, KK4ITX John via groups.io <jleahy00@...> wrote:


Strange how an old platform like the FT-817 STILL does not have any real competitors, after all this time.

John
'KK4ITX



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:52:42 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Shirley:

You're right about the T41-EP. However, a smaller display, half the power output, tri-band, and putting things on one board might get it small enough to be a possibility. I actually like the G90, and ran it at 15W on SSB during Field Day and made a lot of contacts with a marginal antenna. But for hunt-and-pounce operation that is so common for QRP'ers, the G90 display just presents too small of a spectrum slice.

I hope someone does try to reduce the nano-acres of the T41-EP so it can be used for SOTA, IOTA, POTA, etc.

Jack, W8TEE

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:42:02 PM EDT, Shirley Dulcey KE1L <mark@...> wrote:


Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:
I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

Well said, Mike!?

73 Hans G0UPL
http://qrp-labs.com
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/g0upl


-------- Original message --------
From: mike mccarthy <mikemccarthy_50@...>
Date: Thu, Aug 18, 2022, 9:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

I think we have to be careful not to put to much pressure? on Hans.? The golden egg which is Hans could easily be damaged with his work load and other responsibilities.? I want a QSX but not at the expense of a good mans health. With Hans abilities, helpful ?personality and the assistance he gives to those of us who are not so competent without talking down to us he ?is a one off.? If he produces the QSX consider it a bonus.? In the meantime we have the QCX.? ( still think the original is the best).

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

Sent from for Windows

?

From: Shirley Dulcey KE1L
Sent: 18 August 2022 18:42
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

?

Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

?

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:

I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?

?


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

IC-705 does 2m and 70cm and DStar.? Waterfall display and touch screen too.

?

Steve

W5RRX

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of KK4ITX John via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2022 12:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

?

IC-705, not quite yet......... 2m & 70cm ?

?

?

?

for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club

Many of life's failures are people who

did not realize how close they were to

success when they gave up.

?????? Thomas A. Edison?????

?

?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:28:34 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:

?

?

IC-705?

?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:22:56 PM EDT, KK4ITX John via groups.io <jleahy00@...> wrote:

?

?

Strange how an old platform like the FT-817 STILL does not have any real competitors, after all this time.

?

John

'KK4ITX

?

?

?

for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club

Many of life's failures are people who

did not realize how close they were to

success when they gave up.

?????? Thomas A. Edison?????

?

?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:52:42 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:

?

?

Shirley:

?

You're right about the T41-EP. However, a smaller display, half the power output, tri-band, and putting things on one board might get it small enough to be a possibility. I actually like the G90, and ran it at 15W on SSB during Field Day and made a lot of contacts with a marginal antenna. But for hunt-and-pounce operation that is so common for QRP'ers, the G90 display just presents too small of a spectrum slice.

?

I hope someone does try to reduce the nano-acres of the T41-EP so it can be used for SOTA, IOTA, POTA, etc.

?

Jack, W8TEE

?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:42:02 PM EDT, Shirley Dulcey KE1L <mark@...> wrote:

?

?

Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

?

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:

I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I think we have to be careful not to put to much pressure? on Hans.? The golden egg which is Hans could easily be damaged with his work load and other responsibilities.? I want a QSX but not at the expense of a good mans health. With Hans abilities, helpful ?personality and the assistance he gives to those of us who are not so competent without talking down to us he ?is a one off.? If he produces the QSX consider it a bonus.? In the meantime we have the QCX.? ( still think the original is the best).

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

Sent from for Windows

?

From: Shirley Dulcey KE1L
Sent: 18 August 2022 18:42
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

?

Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

?

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

?

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:

I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?

?


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

IC-705, not quite yet......... 2m & 70cm ?



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:28:34 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


IC-705?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:22:56 PM EDT, KK4ITX John via groups.io <jleahy00@...> wrote:


Strange how an old platform like the FT-817 STILL does not have any real competitors, after all this time.

John
'KK4ITX



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:52:42 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Shirley:

You're right about the T41-EP. However, a smaller display, half the power output, tri-band, and putting things on one board might get it small enough to be a possibility. I actually like the G90, and ran it at 15W on SSB during Field Day and made a lot of contacts with a marginal antenna. But for hunt-and-pounce operation that is so common for QRP'ers, the G90 display just presents too small of a spectrum slice.

I hope someone does try to reduce the nano-acres of the T41-EP so it can be used for SOTA, IOTA, POTA, etc.

Jack, W8TEE

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:42:02 PM EDT, Shirley Dulcey KE1L <mark@...> wrote:


Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:
I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?


Re: Low signal levels on QDX

 

Thanks for that, I built using the instructions I used for the first QDX. Cut the track and the QDX now now works fine.
Will now try and rescue something out of the first QDX.
--
G4HCW/VK5AHZ


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

IC-705?

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 02:22:56 PM EDT, KK4ITX John via groups.io <jleahy00@...> wrote:


Strange how an old platform like the FT-817 STILL does not have any real competitors, after all this time.

John
'KK4ITX



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:52:42 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Shirley:

You're right about the T41-EP. However, a smaller display, half the power output, tri-band, and putting things on one board might get it small enough to be a possibility. I actually like the G90, and ran it at 15W on SSB during Field Day and made a lot of contacts with a marginal antenna. But for hunt-and-pounce operation that is so common for QRP'ers, the G90 display just presents too small of a spectrum slice.

I hope someone does try to reduce the nano-acres of the T41-EP so it can be used for SOTA, IOTA, POTA, etc.

Jack, W8TEE

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:42:02 PM EDT, Shirley Dulcey KE1L <mark@...> wrote:


Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:
I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

Strange how an old platform like the FT-817 STILL does not have any real competitors, after all this time.

John
'KK4ITX



for Zephyrhills Area Amateur Radio Club
Many of life's failures are people who
did not realize how close they were to
success when they gave up.
?????? Thomas A. Edison?????


On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:52:42 PM EDT, jjpurdum via groups.io <jjpurdum@...> wrote:


Shirley:

You're right about the T41-EP. However, a smaller display, half the power output, tri-band, and putting things on one board might get it small enough to be a possibility. I actually like the G90, and ran it at 15W on SSB during Field Day and made a lot of contacts with a marginal antenna. But for hunt-and-pounce operation that is so common for QRP'ers, the G90 display just presents too small of a spectrum slice.

I hope someone does try to reduce the nano-acres of the T41-EP so it can be used for SOTA, IOTA, POTA, etc.

Jack, W8TEE

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:42:02 PM EDT, Shirley Dulcey KE1L <mark@...> wrote:


Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:
I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

Shirley:

You're right about the T41-EP. However, a smaller display, half the power output, tri-band, and putting things on one board might get it small enough to be a possibility. I actually like the G90, and ran it at 15W on SSB during Field Day and made a lot of contacts with a marginal antenna. But for hunt-and-pounce operation that is so common for QRP'ers, the G90 display just presents too small of a spectrum slice.

I hope someone does try to reduce the nano-acres of the T41-EP so it can be used for SOTA, IOTA, POTA, etc.

Jack, W8TEE

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 01:42:02 PM EDT, Shirley Dulcey KE1L <mark@...> wrote:


Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:
I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?


Re: Upgraded my QCX-mini firmware chip, now do I have to recalibrate etc?

 

Got it working!!! I had to do a factory reset after installing the new firmware chip.

Thank you for all the help!!!

73
Ryan NC4RA


Re: QSX 4th birthday !!! #qsx

 

Indeed! I look forward to seeing the QSX someday.

What is missing is a physically small radio for field use,?something to compete with the FT-817, KX2, KX3, and the Xiegu?rigs. We have the sBitx and the T41-EP now; they?are good SDRs but they're both on the big side, so they're not ideal for SOTA or other applications where you carry the radio in. We have the uSDX and its descendents, but they're more in the category of cool hack than high performance radio.

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:09 PM KEN G4APB <lfoofui.nbz42@...> wrote:
I noticed the fourth year of the QSX announcement has sneaked quietly past us. A progress report would be nice¡­

The QDX-mini was fun but despite mods for wspr rx bandwidth still single band¡­and the QDX despite my mods for most bands is not a ¡®complete¡¯ standalone radio system, and I even have a three band U3S data transceiver, ?I really am looking forward to a fully integrated physically small SSB solution to take on hols. My FT-897 is just tooo big.

73 Ken g4apb?