¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: QRP Labs xciever with SSB capability
Hello Ron I'm not sure how that can reconcile with VK2IHL's result with the Polish example which uses drain amplitude modulation. He shows two tone peaks quite clearly and everything else below
By Hans Summers · #127702 ·
Re: QRP Labs xciever with SSB capability
RE some of the two tone plots from reading the links: I found with my experiments with a Teensy version of the usdx from the qcx board that a two tone test does not test the entire polar modulation
By Ron Carr · #127701 ·
Re: QRP Labs xciever with SSB capability
DL2MAN, I have a far better memory than you apparently.? ?However its all in the history of the group and still recoverable. The brass board was to build out extended ideas.? As it gave me the room
By ajparent1/kb1gmx · #127700 ·
Re: QRP Labs xciever with SSB capability
Hello Bojan VK2IHL actually said regarding IMD3: ? -40dBc/IMD3 Excellent ? -30dBc/IMD3 Good ? -20dBc/IMD3 Poor ? -10dBc/IMD3 Very poor But there is some room for confusion, between whether you
By Hans Summers · #127699 ·
Re: QRP Labs xciever with SSB capability
Hi Hans, this difference of 15 dB in favour to the drain modulation compared to the gate modulation raises some hopes. Reading the article from the link about the measured IMD3 I realised the result
By Bojan Naglic · #127698 ·
Re: Qmx+ shipping delay ??
Thank you for the explanation, Hans! Fingers crossed for Windows adventure ;)
By Simon · #127697 ·
Re: Qmx+ shipping delay ??
Hi Simon We did get the QLG3 PCBs on 02-Aug-2024 and the antennas arrived on 07-Aug-2024; we are currently shipping the backlog which should hopefully be caught up on soon. There were 163 pending
By Hans Summers · #127696 ·
Re: Qmx+ shipping delay ??
Is there any news on this? I just want to make sure I'm not on vacation when the package arrives (ordered last week of July). 73! Simon
By Simon · #127695 ·
Re: FT8 and WSPR question #ft8 #wspr
Wayne, What radio do you have? Tangential to your question: with the QMX/QMX+, you can control it with a cell phone or tablet using an app, no need for a computer or complex setup. (note: this is
By VA3CJO - Chris "CJ" · #127694 ·
Re: QCX alignment : what is it, and when do you need to repeat the process ?
As Alan says. If the QCX has recently been built by you: 1. Make sure C1 is not at either maximum or minimum at the signal peak...if it is then you will need to make alterations to the input BPF
By Steve G4EDG · #127693 ·
Re: QRP Labs xciever with SSB capability
Hello Manuel At the outset - just to be clear - you know I love you, and I am not interested in any kind of emotive argument about anything, I am only very interested on the technical aspects, ONLY.
By Hans Summers · #127692 ·
Re: QCX alignment : what is it, and when do you need to repeat the process ?
The manual says:- Band-pass trimmer capacitor peaking, C1 ? I-Q amplitude balance, R27 ? Audio phase shift adjustments, R17 and R24 The first is obvious, unlikely to change appreciably with
By Alan G4ZFQ · #127691 ·
QCX alignment : what is it, and when do you need to repeat the process ?
Could someone please have a go to try and explain in simple terms what the alignment process on the QCX actually does ? I understand the manual says to do this once construction is complete. But are
By Eben Fourie · #127690 ·
Re: QRP Labs xciever with SSB capability
I disagree, as you can clearly sense their agenda. You don?t even need to read between the lines as both make their personal issues with us/me relatively clear. We decided against "jumping through
By Manuel; DL2MAN · #127689 ·
Re: QRP Labs xciever with SSB capability
I think this is a very interesting read on uSDX/(tr)uSDX, a lot of interesting info here: https://vk2ihl.wordpress.com/ And: https://owenduffy.net/blog/?p=28224 73 Hans G0UPL http://qrp-labs.com
By Hans Summers · #127688 ·
Re: QRP Labs xciever with SSB capability
That?s pretty vague and too anecdotal for a technical person, like you. I can?t really tell what went wrong on your "brassboard" but I assume, you?ve used old QCX SSB Code. Same goes for QCX: QCX
By Manuel; DL2MAN · #127687 ·
Re: FT8 and WSPR question #ft8 #wspr
See what emissions you can receive. Newer rigs tend to have a soundcard built-in and connect directly to a PC via USB. Older rigs benefit from a digital interface like signalink that can also connect
By Curt wb8yyy · #127686 ·
Re: FT8 and WSPR question #ft8 #wspr
And join the "FT8 Digital Mode with WSJT-X" and "WSJTX" groups right here on groups.io.
By pgramsey, N9LFF · #127685 ·
Re: FT8 and WSPR question #ft8 #wspr
I figured out how to run FT8 mostly from reading Hinson's guide. Here is a link, I'm not sure if it's THE link. http://www.g4ifb.com/FT8_Hinson_tips_for_HF_DXers.pdf
By pgramsey, N9LFF · #127684 ·
Re: QMX Tune rate
To answer my own question, I put my QMX (midband, rev 4, f/w 026) in FT8 on WSJT-X on 14.074. Lots of strong signals all over the sub band. I then changed the band on the QMX (NOT using WSJT-X) to
By Daniel Walter · #127683 ·