¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Info pawer 5 v qlg1 external

 

Hello Giuseppe,
Yes, an external 5 volt supply will work. I have 2 QLG-1's and a QLG-2 and use external power (not supplied by my QRP Labs equipment) on them all.

For the QLG-1 units I use a 7805 voltage regulator IC to step down externally supplied 12 volts to 5V.?

--Al
WD4AH


Re: QDX - No RF output, Tx line stays low

 

Hi Ben,

I like the power box.? I thought of doing this myself, though I would like to include the switch in the QDX case.??

On a clue from the QDX Linux ModemManager thread, I have added one more step that seems to avoid the power down and wait:? Use PuTTY to ensure the QDX is not in terminal mode.
? ? ?Startup PuTTY and connect to the QDX.?
? ? ?Exit out of terminal mode,
? ? ?close the window,
? ? ?and then start WSJT-X.?
The power down and wait I believe is resetting the terminal mode set by the first connection.? It probably takes about the same amount of time as using PuTTY.? Using PuTTY to ensure the QDX is NOT in terminal mode has been a more reliable process for me so far.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Info pawer 5 v qlg1 external

GIUSEPPE
 

Hello everyone, I have a problem with the PTT output of the qcx mini for 20 meters, it does not give me the 5 volts to power the qlg1.? I would like to know if it is possible to use a 5v power supplied by an external power supply to make the wspr beacon work.? thank you and have a nice day. 73 IU8EUN Giuseppe


Re: QDX - RF Filter Sweep graphs?

 

All,

I have found that the RF sweeps need to be connected to a good 50ohm resistive dummy load (shielded is better) to be repeatable (within accuracy limits).? Connecting to an antenna introduces received signals from the antenna which could be different each time you run the sweep.? Leaving it unconnected would cause issues with the lowpass filter that is ahead of the bandpass filter you are sweeping.

In my case, I had RF sweeps like Brent and on inspection of my L12 winding, I found that I had an extra turn in the first 19 turns of L12 which explains the lower peaks on the bandpass filter on my sweep.? Removing the turn moved all up, though 30 meters was still not centered.? The other bands were centered within reason.? My 20meters sweep did not seem to change much and is similar to Brent's before and after the turn removal of L12.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: QCX WARC Party - November 2021

 

which freq. are you all using for the QCX WARC party ? I assume somewhere around 10.106 / 10.116 ?
73
Chris
M0AWN


Re: QCX WARC Party - November 2021

 

Hi Luc
?
(note : I think we have lost Hans for the QCX parties, I see from the many spots he's having way too much fun in FT8/JS8Call with his QDX? ;-)

Hi hi... yes I have been having fun with FT8 and JS8. JS8 particularly. I am not so fond of FT8. I find it a bit like a computer game and with similar addictive characteristics :-/? ? I had a nice long 40m JS8 ragchew with Joerg?DL8XAW yesterday evening... remoting into the station, at the same time as getting the LabTech-mini to sleep! I'm enjoying learning more about the networking and message handling capabilities of JS8Call.?

I was out of QCX parties merely due to severe?overload. Then after our office move, no antenna for some weeks. But... now I might get things back on track, might find a little time, and join the QCX parties again. I even have a 30m mobile whip antenna that arrived a week ago, a present from TA3EN who makes them. Of course XYL would never have me drilling holes in the Nissan and so I will need to find a way to bolt it to the balcony here or something. So maybe next time I could even join the WARC party :-)?

Today... no... but have fun!?

73 Hans G0UPL



Re: QCX WARC Party - November 2021

 

Hi all,

NOTE that we are in winter time now ... so make sure that you are on the air in the correct time slot ;-)

For most of us in Europe, 1300, 1900 and 0300 UTC translates to 1400 , 2000 and 0400 CET?

73,
Luc ON7DQ


Re: QDX - RF Filter Sweep graphs?

 

Hi Brent,

I have quite similar rf filter sweep graphs. I re did L12 and some other toroids risking to damage the pads but almost nothing changed. I was concerned especially about 20M as I have a similar weird graphic on that too. But last weekend I connected QDX to a tuned 20M antenna and did very successful qso's. So I think the rf filter sweep info is not that accurate. Do not do anything until this is cleared out as Alan suggests.
Take a look at QDX issues topic you can see my rf filter graphs and pskreporter screenshots that shows the QDX is working fine with even that wierd rf filter sweer graph.

/g/QRPLabs/topic/86953388#74545

Br.


Re: QDX next batch

 

Hi all

Today I received news, the PCB manufacture of the 375pcs?Rev 2 QDX board is completed. See attached photos. The boards will now be transferred?to a different facility, along with the reels of SMD components, to wait their turn in line for the SMD assembly machines. If all goes well, I am hoping for availability in the QRP Labs shop around mid December.

As promised, here are the details of the changes for QDX Rev 2. It should be noted that there are no major known shortcomings in the QDX hardware, Rev 1. There were three problems with Rev 1, all of which were detected before sale/shipment and mandatory modifications added to the assembly instructions, with necessary components supplied:
  • Four 47uH SMD inductors that need to be replaced by through-hole components;
  • 220uF capacitor at the DC input to prevent spikes killing the AMS1117 regulator;
  • 25MHz TCXO on small daughtercard, installed instead of the 25MHz crystal which was too drifty
The first job of the Rev 2 changes was to remove the need for these three mandatory modifications. This is a matter of cost and assembly convenience, but mostly does not?alter performance or functionality.?
  1. The pullup resistors R5, 10, 11, 12 and 14 that pulled up MOSFET gates to?+5V were removed, as they were not necessary and not in use.?
  2. L1, 5, 7 and 9 (47uH SMD) have been replaced with through-hole axial molded inductors that are installed in the PCB properly as all other through-hole components, not tacked on the bottom as a modification.?
  3. IC2 (5V regulator) has been replaced by 78M05 which is a very robust regulator and this removes the need for the added 220uF capacitor. Additionally IC1 (AMS1117-3.3), the 3.3V regulator, is now powered at 5V from the 78M05. It is therefore working much less hard.?
  4. 25MHz TCXO, decoupling capacitor, and coupling capacitor are now all SMD components installed directly on the underside of the board by the SMD assembly factory, they are not on a separate tiny TCXO daughtercard.?
  5. A P-channel MOSFET is added at the DC input socket as reverse polarity protection. The device used is AO3407. It is rated 4.1A and has a specified?typical ON-resistance of 34 milli-ohms. At 1A (say) on a 9V QDX the voltage drop will therefore be 0.034V which is of little consequence.
  6. A potential divider circuit added to bias the BPF switch IC3 at mid-rail; this was neglected in the original and does not seem to cause any issues but perhaps in the case of very strong signals, could have a few dB impact on dynamic range.?
73 Hans G0UPL


On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 12:48 AM Tobias Lloyd <saibot@...> wrote:
Perfect, thank you Hans. ? Did you see my email reply to my order about holding off on shipping to me and using my stock to help backfill your shortage?? I¡¯m willing to wait for R2.


Re: QDX - RF Filter Sweep graphs?

 

On 15/11/2021 01:14, Brent WT4U wrote:
Here are my RF sweeps. Not pretty & not sure what's going on. I'm thinking to remove the first turn from
Brent

Do nothing until Hans comments.

The scale of each trace is different, look at the figures on the left. The 20m one in particular has a big range.
It seems to me these charts do not always work properly. I have seen different traces without making any changes to my QDX.

73 Alan G4ZFQ


Re: Attention QDX Linux users #qdx

 

Even better... one command that will stop and mask the service immediately, I just tested it (systemd 247 (247.3-3ubuntu3.6)).

systemctl mask --now ModemManager.service


Re: Attention QDX Linux users #qdx

 

About stopping ModemManager. The service can be stopped and disabled, but it can still be started again by other dependencies. If you mask the service it should never start again. You can always unmask the service to start using it again.

If you are never going to use 4G/LTE modems (USB sticks or built into laptops). This is the easier solution.

About masking and unmasking in the systemctl man page:

mask:
This will link these unit files to /dev/null, making it impossible
to start them. This is a stronger version of disable, since it
prohibits all kinds of activation of the unit, including enablement
and manual activation. Use this option with care.

unmask:
Unmask one or more unit files, as specified on the command line.
This will undo the effect of mask.


# systemctl disable --now ModemManager.service 
Removed /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/ModemManager.service.
Removed /etc/systemd/system/dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service.

# systemctl mask ModemManager.service Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/ModemManager.service ¡ú /dev/null.


Re: Attention QDX Linux users #qdx

 

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:44 AM, syuji ota wrote:
However, when the Linux or Windows systems sends <CR> without user permission,
QDX goes into terminal application mode and USB audio is stops.
If so, can you change the command to enter terminal application mode?
This is interesting, but I was able to enter the QDX menu system while watching the spectrum with baudline, and the audio never stops when I pressed enter and entered the menu. Was also able to send CAT commands, the audio only changes when going between RX/TX.

I checked with the following commands:

serial console:
minicom -D /dev/serial/by-id/usb-QRP_Labs_QDX_Transceiver-if00 -c on

baudline:
parec --format=s16le --channels=1 --latency-msec=5 | ./baudline -stdin


Re: QDX for sale

 

Sorry, I meant to write George in the previous email, apologies it has been a long day!

Best regards, Peter.


Re: QDX for sale

 

Hi Twolane,

I will take this off your hands if you still have it, shipping is to Sanibel FL.

Thanks!

Best regards, Peter.


QDX died while updating FW procedure

 

Hi all,

So far it¡¯s been a fun project to build and have appreciated everyone¡¯s tips and gotchas.?
And of course enjoyed Hans¡¯ photos of his tech assistant.

Order# 50083

OS: RPi4 (Buster)

FW: was trying to install 1.01c from original shipped fw.

PWR: built for 12V (3:2), was using 9V battery as input for initial testing

PCB: Rev1
PCB placement: not in case, just sitting on table

Build deviations: removed SMD inductors as first item so PCB could sit flat before installing topside components. Build was straight forward except for the replacement inductors was messy.

?

Downloaded 1.01c to RPi and unzipped file. (119.5K)

Inserted 9V battery for pwr, LED blinks properly. Using Putty, successfully connected via USB from RPi4 into QDX on port /dev/ttyACM0 and was able to access the QDX.

First thing to do, update the FW to latest release before doing anything else.

In menu, selected ¡°Update Firmware¡±, LED blinks slowly, brings up file manager similar to page 80 of manual v1.06. Dragged/dropped file 1.01c into the area window.

It brought up another window to show the transfer, but everything just stopped without transferring anything. LED went dark, and USB connection dropped. No magic smoke.

I¡¯ve tried applying power multiple times, but no blinking LED, etc. and no USB comms. I checked both AMS1117 and they are putting out their required voltages. I don¡¯t have fine diagnostic probes to check VDD on the processor or other SMD components without wreaking havoc.

Any thoughts what I did wrong and how to get it back to life?

thanks, 73,

.paul. VA3FUZ


QDX died while updating FW procedure

 

Hi all,

So far it¡¯s been a fun project to build and have appreciated everyone¡¯s tips and gotchas.? And of course enjoyed Hans¡¯ photos of his tech assistant.

Order# 50083

OS: RPi4 (buster)

FW: was trying to install 1.01c from original shipped fw.

PWR: built for 12V (3:2), was using 9V battery as input for initial testing

PCB: Rev1

Build deviations: removed SMD inductors as first item so PCB could sit flat before installing topside components. Build was straight forward except for the replacement inductors was messy.

?

Downloaded 1.01c to RPi and unzipped file. (119.5K)

Inserted 9V battery for pwr, LED blinks properly. Using Putty, successfully connected via USB from RPi4 into QDX on port /dev/ttyACM0 and was able to access the QDX.

First thing to do, update the FW to latest release before doing anything else.

In menu, selected ¡°Update Firmware¡±, LED blinks slowly, brings up file manager similar to page 80 of manual v1.06. Dragged/dropped file 1.01c into the area window.

It brought up another window to show the transfer, but everything just stopped without transferring anything. LED went dark, and USB connection dropped. No magic smoke ?

I¡¯ve tried applying power multiple times, but no blinking LED, etc. and no USB comms. I checked both AMS1117 and they are putting out their required voltages. I don¡¯t have fine diagnostic probes to check VDD on the processor or other SMD components without wreaking havoc.

Any thoughts why it would just die and not coming back to life?

thanks, 73,

.paul. VA3FUZ


Re: QDX - RF Filter Sweep graphs?

 

firmware: 1.01c
OS: Ubuntu 20.04.3
xfrmr: 3:3 9v
power: 2S Li-ion ~8v
deviations:
1) went overboard with the magnet wire allowance and came up short on T2, so the B wire is from the scrap bin. No reason to expect it matters, except I had to scrape it the insulation.
2) no case. Still in my pcb vice

Here are my RF sweeps. Not pretty & not sure what's going on. I'm thinking to remove the first turn from L12 to shift the peaks up, but I don't think that will help the numbers or 20m.






¨CBrent WT4U


Re: Attention QDX Linux users #qdx

 

Hi Hans,
?
QDX goes into terminal application mode when it receives a <CR> (carriage return).
CAT command does not include <CR>.?
However, when the Linux or Windows systems sends <CR> without user permission,
QDX goes into terminal application mode and USB audio is stops.
If so, can you change the command to enter terminal application mode?
For example, can it be changed to QDXTERM <CR>.
Are there any problems?
?
?73 syuji ota? JH3AQQ


Re: Attention QDX Linux users #qdx

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hans,

the issue with Linux arises because the QDX presents its serial interface as a modem, or in emulation-speak possessing the Abstract Control Model (hence the /dev/ttyACM0 designation, rather than the more frequent /dev/ttyUSB0). These days dial-up modems are a rarity, but wireless modems, such as for GSM, 3G &c. are in common use.

Rather than the drastic hack of disabling the Modem Manager, which may be needed to support other hardware, Ben's (PA2ST) suggestion (/g/QRPLabs/message/74652) of using a udev rule is a very sound & reliable solution.

Much other SDR kit requires one or more udev rules under Linux.

HTH, 73, Stay Safe,

Robin, G8DQX


On 14/11/2021 15:30, Hans Summers wrote:

Hi all

This applies only to Linux users.?

I knew this a long time ago due to QSX development. But it got forgotten in the mists of time. Now in talking with Chris KC0TKS about an issue on RPi400 (no CAT) I remembered the problem.?

On Linux systems (most distros) when a new Virtual COM Port gets plugged in, there's a process called ModemManager which tries to initialize it as a modem. It sends various commands to the port like a decades' old Hayes At modem. After a while it surely includes a carriage return in its mutterings and this causes QDX to think it is talking to a terminal emulator like PuTTY and it starts up the QDX Terminal applications menu. And then it won't talk to a CAT controller.?

So on your Linux computer press Ctrl-Alt-T to open up a terminal window. Type (it is one line) :

sudo systemctl status ModemManager.service

You'll get some response which will tell you whether or not the service is running. If it is: you've found the problem.?

To solve this problem you have to type these two commands to stop and disable the ModemManger:

sudo systemctl stop ModemManager.service
sudo systemctl disable ModemManager.service

Now you should be able to plug in QDX afresh and it should work normally.?

Unfortunately when your computer reboots this ModemManager nonsense will be restarted. So you have to add those two commands to a startup script so that they run every time your computer starts. On RPi and some other Linux systems the commands need to be entered in the file /etc/rc.local but this might not be the same on all Linux distros, I don't know.?

These commands stop and disable the ModemManager service. QDX (and other similar COM Port emulations) will then work correctly and normally. I don't know of any reason in 2021 where typically you would need this ModemManager service to be running. If for some reason you do, there is some more complicated way to make ModemManager ignore specific devices, but I don't know all the details right now.?

Yes, I will be adding this Linux ModemManager stuff to the manual.?

73 Hans G0UPL