Re: Pi OS for QDX\QMX
Hi you are correct TS 480 works for RPlabs stuff. I use it for my QDX. Ask more questions if you get stuck.
By
Chris Herd
·
#127863
·
|
Re: QMX+ VDD 2 ohms to ground
Jens, I did not perform the pin-lifting process.? I believe that it was LIN_REG_EN, pin 88. An easier test might be to remove L202 and disconnect the MPU from the Vdd line to see if the low
By
Evan Hand
·
#127862
·
|
Re: QMX+ VDD 2 ohms to ground
Hi Evan, which pin exactly ¡ìare you referring to? In the circuit diagram, I can't find any connection of the MPU? which is labeled "IO". 73 Jens HB9EKO
By
Jens HB9EKO
·
#127861
·
|
Re: QMX vs QMX+ for portable operations
Yes, those dimensions are on the web pages for QMX and QMX+ resp. I don't think I weighed them. A significant part of the weight is in the enclosure. QCX-mini and QMX share the same enclosure and
By
Hans Summers
·
#127860
·
|
Re: QMX vs QMX+ for portable operations
Andreas DM7AK wrote¡ QMX The enclosure size is 95 x 63 x 25mm without protrusions. QMX+ The enclosure size is 106 x 55 x 146mm deep without protrusions (knobs and connectors) -- 73 Keith VE7GDH
By
Keith VE7GDH
·
#127859
·
|
Re: QMX vs QMX+ for portable operations
Hi! I haven't found dimensions of the QMX+ anywhere but to me it appears to be of similar if not smaller size than the Yaesu FT-817/818 series which did the job for a couple of decades and operators.
By
Andreas DM7AK
·
#127858
·
|
Re: Pi OS for QDX\QMX
I haven¡¯t got mine yet so can¡¯t confirm it but based on the RSGB Today Youtube Video slides that Hans presented I think if you select Kenwood TS-480 that could work as the QMX CAT protocol
By
Talk21
·
#127857
·
|
Re: MidBand QMX, not receive on 20/17/15
I'm thinking of replacing the PCM1804. Because, when pins 5 and 6 are short-circuited, a distorted receive appears.
By
Nurlan
·
#127856
·
|
Re: QMX vs QMX+ for portable operations
This is just my thoughts on the relative size of them, I'm sure many here will disagree. I have the QCX+ and mini. I really like the mini, very, very much. That said, the + while bigger, the size is
By
[email protected]
·
#127855
·
|
Re: Pi OS for QDX\QMX
Bob, Unfortunately, the software versions that are in the repositories are nearly always one or two versions behind.? I'm not sure why this is, probably the people updating the repositories are just
By
Mark Griffith
·
#127854
·
|
Re: QMX and QRP Labs 50 w Amp
Hi Mitch, PTT output needs to enabled on a per band basis in the terminal application. It¡¯s disabled by default. You can refer to section 8.5 of the operation manual (TX PTT +5V). Although unlikely,
By
Zhenxing Han N6HAN
·
#127853
·
|
QMX vs QMX+ for portable operations
Hello everyone, my current portable setup features a 30m QCX, which is a great rig, but after more than six years on the 30m band I thought I should try to get on a few other bands as well, preferably
By
Robert
·
#127852
·
|
QMX Filter Confusion
Greetings all ... new here, QMX arrived Monday and I took it out on it's first POTA outing today. To be fair, we're both pretty green, I'm back on the air after nearly 30 years and just 32 POTA
By
Mike Carter
·
#127851
·
|
Re: New To Me QCX
Terrence KO6CGU
By
Terrence KO6CGU
·
#127850
·
|
QMX and QRP Labs 50 w Amp
I'm hoping I can get some guidance here. I've used my 20m 50w QRP Labs PA for several years with a QCX mini. No problems. However with the QMX it appears the PTT output is not triggering the PA. No
By
Mitch NK3H
·
#127849
·
|
Re: Pi OS for QDX\QMX
Chris I tried the KM4ACK but the js8call didn't list the QDX. I'll keep trying.? Only a reformat of a memory card. Bob KG5GTE
By
Bob Parr
·
#127848
·
|
Re: New To Me QCX
You might try finding a websdr in your area. I use the websdr waterfall display to find which frequencies CW operators are using and dial my QCX mini to those frequencies. Sometimes I just use a
By
Ben KN6QWP
·
#127847
·
|
Re: New To Me QCX
Be sure to let us know how it gets resolved. -- Wayne S. KF7RCM
By
[email protected]
·
#127846
·
|
Re: New To Me QCX
Thank you John KK4ITX , You have provided some solid advice. You brought up a lot of good points that I did not consider. I appreciate your input. Thank you, Terrence KO6CGU 73
By
Terrence KO6CGU
·
#127844
·
|
Re: New To Me QCX
Hello Ronald, The headphones didn't work. I will consult the manual to see what I am doing wrong. I even listened for my signal on another radio. i believe my issue is operator error. Thank you,
By
Terrence KO6CGU
·
#127842
·
|