That's a good idea. I've reached out to the person and hope to hear back from them about kit/QRP radios and exceptions. If not, I will modify the application?to state using a commercial HT.?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 10:47?AM Stan Dye via <standye=[email protected]> wrote:
Perhaps taking a commercial HT, and giving the FCC compliance certificate for that radio would suffice the needs of the application.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 11:37?AM Saurabh N6RUN via <saurabh=[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks Tisha. Appreciate the insight.?
The communication from the department did not have any more specifics that they asked for. (In their not-so-formal looking application form).?
My sense is that they¡¯re just looking for something from any country vs enforcing what they might care about.?
Fair point about kit built radios. I can ask the engineer who responded to my email but my fear (anticipation) is that they¡¯ll simply decline vs engaging further.?
-Saurabh
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 09:16 Tisha Hayes, AA4HA via <Tisha.Hayes=[email protected]> wrote:
IMHO,
Getting product compliance (conformity) may not happen. There are at least a dozen different regulatory bodies across the world that require different technical and testing standards to earn a conformity certificate. The testing is usually done by independent engineering laboratories and firms and can cost several thousands of dollars (euros, pounds, US dollars) to happen.
?
On kit-built radios you may 'never' get a conformity certificate as much of the RF circuitry is assembled by radio amateurs themselves and errors in assembly or modifications would invalidate any certificate.
?
You may need to look closer at what Nepal requires to see if there is an exception for kit-built or amateur-built radios. Maybe they have something or they may be so tightly regulated as to not allow it at all.
?
It would probably be impossible for QRP Labs to gain and then maintain conformity certificates and test results for all of their products, even across just one regulatory agency.