¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)

 

Thank you Jules, Phil and Scott!

Just waiting?to receive latest?PCB revision. Will try to upload some recording tests over the next few days.

If somebody wants to do some more "formal" tests on this design, please send me an email and let me know . I don't have the best conditions/equipment to do it?@home.

Regards!

HL


El mi¨¦, 13 abr 2022 a la(s) 20:08, Scott Helmke (scott@...) escribi¨®:
Homero,

That's a really cool project and a nice tribute to Pat.?

Would love to hear a comparison to a regular mic.

Thanks,
-Scott

On 4/12/22 20:22, Homero Leal wrote:
HI folks!

As some of you may know, one of the dreams of our friend Patrick Davis (aka. P@T, Enjoybiking) was the idea of designing a mic that could have the "tube" sound, but that could also be very cheap to build.

We discussed the topic many times, and the idea of having a solid state tube emulation was a really fascinating option that was always on the table.

Some time ago I found a paper from Dimitri Danyuk called "Triode Emulator", and in this paper he proposes very a simple way to "emulate" triode behavior using a JFET with very specific values for drain and source resistors.

Later, I found this page:



Which provides a way to calculate (look at the end of the page) the required drain and source resistor values using some JFET parameters like:
  • VP
  • IDSS
And also the input voltage of the circuit (VCC).

So, I decided to try a design using the Dimitri Danyuk approach, with the values calculated from the Fetzer Valve page.

You could find the schematic here:

/g/MicBuilders/files/Homero%20Leal%27s%20Files/Pat%27s%20Mic/Pat%27s%20Mic.png

Circuit design uses a Charge Amplifier input stage, a JFET middle stage (providing the "valve" tone"), and finally a impedance balanced output stage with a Sallen Key HPF at about 19.XHz.

Also, a custom voltage regulator is used, using a BC549C NPN and a zener, very similar to the one used on some very known chinese mics. This VR provides about 9.4V for VCC.

I used two drain resistors and two source resistors, so it could be easier to approach the right values calculated by the Fetzer Valve page, by using the combination of two resistors.

As the JFET stage may have an amplification level on the signal, I also used two capacitors for the charge amplifier, this way you could reduce output level by placing an additional capacitor (some math required).

I know the design may have some room for improvement, but I can confirm I have working mic with this design, and it seems to my untrained ear, that it has a very sleek and warm sound, very similar to the sound of the valve mics.

For the build, I used a cheap Zramo donor mic from Amazon, which that very nice 26mm electret capsule we have talked about before.

I decided to name this schematic? "Pat's Mic"... in memory of our friend and former member of this group, P@T?(Patrick Davis, R.I.P.)

This post is for your review and consideration, and please if you have any ideas for improvement, don't hesitate to let me know.

Thank you, and kind regards!

HL








-- 
---- Scott Helmke ---- scott@... ---- (734) 604-9340 ----
"I have ceased distinguishing between the religious and the secular,
for everything is holy"  - Joe Henry


Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)

 

Will try to share some tests next Friday or Saturday.?

Regards!
HL

El lun, 25 abr 2022 a la(s) 19:08, M H (merrickhard@...) escribi¨®:
Any recording tests you could share?


Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)

 

Why do you need RD1 and RD2, wouldn't be one RD enough? Same for RS.
Resistor?values for RD and RS need to be very specific, depending on IDSS, VP JFET values, and input voltage. Two resistors are used to make it easy to match the required values. Look at the ?page a the bottom, for the calculator.

Would we need a HexInverter or something else for the polarisation Voltage?
Yes, if you want to use a LDC capsule.

With the OPA and the Fet and T1 could there be a problem with the current from the Phantompower?
Yes, if the JFET IDSS value is to high. OPA1642 uses about 3.6mA. So, it is recommended to use a JFET with a low IDSS. The one I used has a 2.1mA IDSS value.

Regards!

HL



El jue, 14 abr 2022 a la(s) 02:16, Mic Scharf (micscharf@...) escribi¨®:
Why do you need RD1 and RD2, wouldn't be one RD enough? Same for RS.

Would we need a HexInverter or something else for the polarisation Voltage?

With the OPA and the Fet and T1 could there be a problem with the current from the Phantompower?


Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)

 

Any recording tests you could share?


Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


Le 23/04/2022 ¨¤ 05:55, henryspragens@... a ¨¦crit?:
Unless there is a need for a high pass filter, using a larger coupling cap won't hurt.

Yes.


Something that's often forgotten is the series reactance of a cap is a noise source, just like a series resistance.

Only resistances are a source of brownian noise. Reactances are not.


So if your coupling cap is 3dB down at 50Hz working into , say, 1K ohm, it has a noise contribution at 50HZ same as a 1K resistor.
This is where it takes some discussion.
I take it as a 3.2uF capacitor, that has a reactance of 1Kohm at 50Hz. Its brownian noise contribution is zero.

But the noise current of the active device (FET, BJT, vacuum tube...) developped across the capacitor will contribute to noise as much as a 1k resistor at 50Hz, as much as a 10k resistor at 5Hz, as much as a 100R resistor at 500Hz.


Even at 500Hz, it contributes as much noise as a 100 ohm resistor.
That's partly correct. the contribution of real resistor is brownian noise + In.Z

The contribution of a reactance is only In.Z. In addition it is phase-shifted by 90¡ã, so it combines quadratically, not algebraically. If it is small (<1/10th), it is negligible.


In a mic, there is a tradeoff between noise and the need to high pass filter thumps and plosives.

Yes.


The noise audibility is reduced by the Fletcher-Munson effect, but it's still there on spectral plots of many mics.

Not only the physiological hearing but mainly the spectral distribution will make it less perceptible. White noise has less energy at LF than HF.


I use larger caps than most engineers, because I think I can hear that LF noise.
I won't debate over teh internet what anybody hears or not. ?


Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?

 

Unless there is a need for a high pass filter, using a larger coupling cap won't hurt. Something that's often forgotten is the series reactance of a cap is a noise source, just like a series resistance. So if your coupling cap is 3dB down at 50Hz working into , say, 1K ohm, it has a noise contribution at 50HZ same as a 1K resistor. Even at 500Hz, it contributes as much noise as a 100 ohm resistor. In a mic, there is a tradeoff between noise and the need to high pass filter thumps and plosives.

The noise audibility is reduced by the Fletcher-Munson effect, but it's still there on spectral plots of many mics. I use larger caps than most engineers, because I think I can hear that LF noise.


Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?

 

Understood. That last explanation about Bipolar was really refreshing from the old days, thanks!

Why people don't use? 10uf? 63V, or even 10uf 100V?

Is it only for the space it takes physically inside the XLR connector or there is something related that can affect the frequency response??

Cheers


Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?

 
Edited

An aluminum electrolytic capacitor consists of two Al foil electrodes separated by a conductive electrolyte. Al forms an oxide coating on the surface on contact with air or water, and the oxide coating is the dielectric of the capacitor. So an Al electrolytic consists of two caps in series, one at the anode and one at the cathode. The anode is formed with the thicker oxide, is high voltage and lesser capacitance. The cathode is low voltage, a volt or two, and very high capacitance. The over all result is two caps in series, of which the anode primarily determines the voltage and capacity. It turns out the cathode contributes most of the tiny distortion to any signal passing through.

This is where it gets interesting. Bipolar electrolytics are NOT made as two polar caps in series. Bipolar caps have two anodes and no cathodes. Bipolar caps exhibit much less distortion than polar caps in audio coupling circuits. So to answer the OP question, bipolar caps are fine. They are actually preferred if they can be had in the desired voltage and capacity. They exhibit more than an order of magnitude less distortion. They are physically larger, because the two anodes in series have to be larger to reach the same capacity, but otherwise they are better, even in circuits where the polarity applied never changes.

Let me add that capacitor distortion is likely to be the least contributor to the sound of a mic, but still . . .


Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?

 

We are probably worrying about nothing TBH. Jules @ Sound Sleuth designs excellent circuits, if he says it's good, it'll likely be good.

I can only see a problem if you're intending on capturing low frequencies (e.g. 30Hz) and feeding it into a mixer with low input impedance on its mic channel (e.g. <1000 ohms). If your mixer / sound card mic input is decent it'll have >1500 Ohm on its input and so you won't see a problem.


Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The other issue is size of the capacitor. ?I¡¯m the 3.3uF 63V guy. ?They work great and physically allow you to build the SimpleP48 into the XLR connector. ?I use this with my ZoomF6. ?

Best Regards,

Jules Ryckebusch?

On Apr 21, 2022, at 07:51, a45porhora@... wrote:

?Thanks for the explanation Michael,

the point about tolerance is really good. My plan is to connect that Mic's via XLR to a new Zoom F3, but better for a capacitor rated for at least 50V like this one:

https://www.mouser.es/ProductDetail/Nichicon/UKW1H4R7MDD1TA?qs=WJSLByB5Mu28FaeGBvn6BQ%3D%3D

About low frecuencies:
Reading this: ?he says?
?The capacitor can be 1uF to 4.7uF without noticeable change in sound. I am using 3.3uF
What do you think about this?

Cheers


Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?

 

Thanks for the explanation Michael,

the point about tolerance is really good. My plan is to connect that Mic's via XLR to a new Zoom F3, but better for a capacitor rated for at least 50V like this one:

https://www.mouser.es/ProductDetail/Nichicon/UKW1H4R7MDD1TA?qs=WJSLByB5Mu28FaeGBvn6BQ%3D%3D

About low frecuencies:
Reading this: ?he says?
?The capacitor can be 1uF to 4.7uF without noticeable change in sound. I am using 3.3uF
What do you think about this?

Cheers


Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?

 

I've used both polar and bipolar in the signal lines in microphones. It doesn't make much difference so long as the capacitor value is sufficiently high to pass the low frequencies.

A bipolar electrolytic capacitor is simply the same as two polar electrolytic capacitors back-to-back (with their negative leads tied together or positive leads tied together). If you do put two in series like this, remember that their total capacitance will be half of each capacitor's value.

The Nichicon bipolar caps are excellent. Just make sure they are rated for at least 50V DC if using on Phantom Power (your one here is 35V). I tend to overspec the capacitor capacity so I don't lose low frequencies should whatever I'm sending the mic signal to have feeble input impedance, so I'd typically go for 10?F or above. Capacitor tolerances are often +/- 20% so at 4.7?F you could be as low as 3.7?F in reality, which could start blocking low frequencies if you connect it to a shoddy mixer with a low input impedance.

You would only actually need a bipolar if you're thinking of having switchable power (internal battery vs phantom). Otherwise a polar electrolytic with positive to the XLR side is fine.


Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?

 

Hi all!

After a lot of reading, I see for short cables (less than 2 meters) the Simple P48 circuit is enough for a good quality build.

My question here is: I see a lot of people talk about taking care of polarity on the Electrolytic Aluminum Capacitor, and I was thinking about using a Bipolar like this:

or this one:


Does it make any difference? As far I know using a Bipolar Capacitor you don't have to pay attention to this and I don't know if using a Bipolar Capacitor will produce the same good results as a normal Capacitor


Re: Budget self-made condenser capsule (PCB based backplate!)

 

Does anyone know of source of low resistance 6?m aluminiumised Mylar? I'm not keen to go ripping apart electrolytic caps if I can get my hands on factory samples!
Fig-8.doc in my FILES directory describes a Fig-8 capsule I designed some 40+ yrs ago for Calrec.? It has sources for 5 & 10 um Aluminised Mylar and other useful info.


Re: Budget self-made condenser capsule (PCB based backplate!)

 

Excellent result -- well done! :)
I must confess I didn't think I was going to hear something quite that impressive, when I first downloaded your mp3....

If one could create a version with a capacitance of around 70 - 80pF, and with a low tension membrane, it would be fascinating to know how that would perform in an RF bias mic configuration.
(Some notes here for circuit ideas: )

The commercial RF mics from Sennheiser use a lower tensioned membrane ... feasible simply because there is only around 3 or 4 volts of? RF across the capsule, as opposed to the 60 or 70v DC in a conventional condenser configuration. Helps quite a lot with sensitivity, apparently?..
Low impedance as well --- makes worrying about screening a bit less important! :)
Just a thought...


On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 07:30 PM, <michaeljtbrooks@...> wrote:
Full Instructable now available here:


Re: Budget self-made condenser capsule (PCB based backplate!)

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Excellent!!!! More microphone Instructables!

Best Regards,

Jules Ryckebusch?

On Apr 18, 2022, at 13:30, michaeljtbrooks@... wrote:

?Full Instructable now available here:


Re: Budget self-made condenser capsule (PCB based backplate!)

 

Full Instructable now available here:


Re: Microphone w/ built in compression? ¡°Lamplifier¡±

 

Very interesting!


Re: Budget self-made condenser capsule (PCB based backplate!)

 
Edited

Search for:
V-PROTECH Premium FOIL Thermal Emergency Blanket


For the UK:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/V-PROTECH-Premium-Emergency-Survival-150x100cm/dp/B09TRZT5T1

I deliberately went for the cheapest possible space blanket that said it was Mylar, under the thinking that this would be the thinnest material.


Re: Budget self-made condenser capsule (PCB based backplate!)

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

alloy foil from old wax capacitors as diaphragm. have used in home made ribbon mics.


From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of M H <merrickhard@...>
Sent: Wednesday, 13 April 2022 8:33 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MicBuilders] Budget self-made condenser capsule (PCB based backplate!)
?
Though not Mylar (and not as tough), you maybe could try ultra thin aluminum like the ribbon mic folk use:?
could spray coat one side with a nonconductive lacquer if need be.

Or, if you want to go cheaper than that, you could get some ¡°imitation silver leaf¡±. ?But that is extremely fragile and frustrating to work with, so..?