开云体育

When making larger microphones, I wonder how east it would be to roll your own? I took a little electret mic apart a few years back but don't recall exactly what was inside. I do recall that it was

mstrong82 wrote: Ah, but therein lies the rub. From looking at noise specs for various size mics, from the experiments of one of our members, and according to:

Or adding more diaphragms. Two mics, twice the signal, noise goes up by 1.4.

Andrew Burgess wrote: Right. Either approach begins to degrade high frequency performance due to coincidence considerations. I'm not sure which is easier to manage. Bob -- "Things should be described

only about the last point: the sony ecm 907 and others like it have more than an inch of wire from the capsule to the fet; the nakamichi cm 300 i have sitting in front of me has a one and half inch

From: "Rich Peet" <richpeet@...> I do nature recording, and would agree in general. However, I'd like to experiment with RF mics with diaphragms larger than 1/2" as well. And various boundary

Comments interspersed: snippage all over the place... My apologies, I did not follow this thread from the beginning... it may not all be on this list! :) Someone wrote: This is NOT correct in a normal

It's called mirrorlite, i have links at the office and will find them for you.

You guys want to use 1/2" or bigger. I want to use 6mm and 9.7 is huge in my application, but if it were that much better I would consider it. I'll help you get bigger parts to play with. We all want

ktpbeng wrote: True, my mistake, now that I re-verified it, phantom power is usually supplied over both: HOT and COLD terminals. Trust but verify. Indrek -- Indrek Rebane | Borthwick-Pignon

mstrong82 wrote: The sole reason for bigger is to reduce self noise. If noise can be lowered to be in line with the larger capsules another way that would be great but theory seems to indicate

mstrong82 wrote: Sorry, I missed this in my last response regarding directional capsules. Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein

Regarding connections on the capsule, i think 3-connections is the best way to go. Ground, source, and drain. In this case it's easy to use either linkwitz-mod, or any other powering method.

Hi, mstrong. I record church music, choral works and loud pipe organ. My WM55 XY mic is useful because it's diminuative enough not to intrude on the service. It also produces a strong stereo image. So

--- dnemeth01 <dnemeth01@...> wrote: Depending on your definition of "larger," you can cut the fronts of entirely fairly easily. I suppose it would be possible to drill a larger

Bob Rogers wrote: Actually as capsules are made of quite thin aluminum, you can easily cut hole larger with sharp scalpel (which will not be so sharp after performing this mod). Indrek -- Indrek

--- Indrek Rebane <indrek@...> wrote: Have you done that? There's not a lot of clearance between the face and the diaphragm. I don't think I would have much luck doing that sort of thing,

--- mstrong82 <mstrong@...> wrote: I think something that would be really great would be a capsule that ran off of 48v, so it could easily be run off phantom power. I know a lot of

No, I haven't eliminated anything as far as directional or size. Someone was interested in better 55's, others in 1/2", etc. All are interesting. I must focus on getting one thing at a time done, or

This all sounds great. Any idea what these things will cost? on 12/8/03 3:20 PM, mstrong82 at mstrong@... wrote: