Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- MicBuilders
- Messages
Search
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý
Le 05/05/2022 ¨¤ 19:27, TheCanDo via
groups.io a ¨¦crit?:
In terms of functionalities, it would certainly work. However, the subject here is getting the circuit to sound like a vacuum tube. An opamp could not do that.
No. only singles, duals and quads. However a combination of a dual with a single? or three singles could be functional. A quad would probably exceed the available current.
(Almost) Everybody does. But minimalism is not a proper design endeavour. It takes what it takes to make the thing work.
|
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMay I suggest you decrease significantly C8. In combination with R15, its -3dB cut-off is at 0.015 Hz. ! Would think 100nF is largely enough there. It may not be the
answer to your problem, though, just speculating. Le 06/05/2022 ¨¤ 05:11, Homero Leal a
¨¦crit?:
Hi all, |
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
Hi all,
?
Here's a quick update on the test build with the latest?PCB.
?
I'm experiencing a weird low frequency noise below 1khz. It's?not too high, but can be perceived. At first I thought?it was only room noise, but the?noise remains if I replace the capsule with a small ceramic capacitor. So, it's definitely?something?on the circuit.
?
I have been doing some tests trying to isolate the problem.??At first, I thought it was caused by the current regulator, but it seems to be caused by the JFET, or a combination of JFET and VR.?
?
If I remove the JFET and leave only both OPAs, the noise is gone (VR in place).
?
Also, if I replace the VR for a single 2k resistor, the noise is gone.?
![]() Here is the schematic I'm using: /g/MicBuilders/files/Homero%20Leal%27s%20Files/Pat%27s%20Mic/Pat%27s%20Mic.png Any ideas? Do you think an additional?RC filter after the VR could help? Thank you in advance, and kind regards! HL ? |
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
Hello Homero, I hope all is well.? Has there been any further developments on this circuit, and have you had a chance to run any tests??? I am rather new with some of these concepts.? Could the JFET and/or the transistor be replaced by using a Quad JFET Opa?? An example would be the?OPA1644 (quad).? Not sure if there are?triple Op Amps but could that be something too?? I like minimizing parts when I can.
On Friday, April 29, 2022, 06:25:18 AM PDT, goldenhours_71 <davidstalling@...> wrote:
Here is a great implementation of Wurcer's chargeamp by forum member Zapnspark: /g/MicBuilders/files/Zapnspark/Occam-3b.pdf
|
Re: Switchable patterns in Dual OPA Alice with dual capsule
#°Õ¸é±«·¡°ä°¿±·¶Ù·¡±·³§·¡¸é¡±²Ñ±õ°ä¸é°¿±Ê±á°¿±··¡³§
#dualopaalice
Here is the actual software:
|
Re: Switchable patterns in Dual OPA Alice with dual capsule
#°Õ¸é±«·¡°ä°¿±·¶Ù·¡±·³§·¡¸é¡±²Ñ±õ°ä¸é°¿±Ê±á°¿±··¡³§
#dualopaalice
For ease of use and implementation, wouldn¡¯t free software be a convenient solution? ? I realize physical interface is more satisfying and this is a DIY group, but I thought I¡¯d mention this: |
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
Here is a great implementation of Wurcer's chargeamp by forum member Zapnspark: /g/MicBuilders/files/Zapnspark/Occam-3b.pdf
|
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýScott Wurcer used to be a member here and he did a thorough study of using a charge amp in a mic. As I recall it was very impressive, and probably about 6 or 7 years ago. The designs might still be in the files etc if you look for Scott¡¯s work. It was also written up in Linear Audio here? and here?There is also good information here?
|
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
I know I haven't really posted before but I am so sorry to hear that P@T?passed.... I didn't know until now.? I really appreciated his insights.? He's been a good teacher and I will miss his wisdom.
Homero, thank you for doing this.? I think it's an amazing way to honor your friend.? I would love to build this mic when you finalize the design.? I have been looking at a design similar to this one with the idea of having a Charge Amp with an Opa.? Henry at Audioimprov gave me some really great leads for some schematics from this site but I'm not sure where my notes are.? The main difference seemed to be that the JFET was BEFORE the Opa.? Thanks everyone for all of you passion and heart you put into our hobby.? :) |
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
Thank you Jules, Phil and Scott! Just waiting?to receive latest?PCB revision. Will try to upload some recording tests over the next few days. If somebody wants to do some more "formal" tests on this design, please send me an email and let me know . I don't have the best conditions/equipment to do it?@home. El mi¨¦, 13 abr 2022 a la(s) 20:08, Scott Helmke (scott@...) escribi¨®:
|
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
Will try to share some tests next Friday or Saturday.? Regards! HL El lun, 25 abr 2022 a la(s) 19:08, M H (merrickhard@...) escribi¨®: Any recording tests you could share? |
Re: Pat's Mic (Fetzer Valve Mic)
Why do you need RD1 and RD2, wouldn't be one RD enough? Same for RS. Resistor?values for RD and RS need to be very specific, depending on IDSS, VP JFET values, and input voltage. Two resistors are used to make it easy to match the required values. Look at the ?page a the bottom, for the calculator. Would we need a HexInverter or something else for the polarisation Voltage? Yes, if you want to use a LDC capsule. With the OPA and the Fet and T1 could there be a problem with the current from the Phantompower? Yes, if the JFET IDSS value is to high. OPA1642 uses about 3.6mA. So, it is recommended to use a JFET with a low IDSS. The one I used has a 2.1mA IDSS value. Regards! HL El jue, 14 abr 2022 a la(s) 02:16, Mic Scharf (micscharf@...) escribi¨®: Why do you need RD1 and RD2, wouldn't be one RD enough? Same for RS. |
Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý
Le 23/04/2022 ¨¤ 05:55,
henryspragens@... a ¨¦crit?:
Unless there is a need for a high pass filter, using a larger coupling cap won't hurt. Yes.
Something that's often forgotten is the series reactance of a cap is a noise source, just like a series resistance. Only resistances are a source of brownian noise. Reactances are not.
So if your coupling cap is 3dB down at 50Hz working into , say, 1K ohm, it has a noise contribution at 50HZ same as a 1K resistor.This is where it takes some discussion. I take it as a 3.2uF capacitor, that has a reactance of 1Kohm at 50Hz. Its brownian noise contribution is zero. But the noise current of the active device (FET, BJT, vacuum tube...) developped across the capacitor will contribute to noise as much as a 1k resistor at 50Hz, as much as a 10k resistor at 5Hz, as much as a 100R resistor at 500Hz.
Even at 500Hz, it contributes as much noise as a 100 ohm resistor.That's partly correct. the contribution of real resistor is brownian noise + In.Z The contribution of a reactance is only In.Z. In addition it is phase-shifted by 90¡ã, so it combines quadratically, not algebraically. If it is small (<1/10th), it is negligible.
In a mic, there is a tradeoff between noise and the need to high pass filter thumps and plosives. Yes.
The noise audibility is reduced by the Fletcher-Munson effect, but it's still there on spectral plots of many mics. Not only the physiological hearing but mainly the spectral
distribution will make it less perceptible. White noise has less
energy at LF than HF.
I use larger caps than most engineers, because I think I can hear that LF noise.I won't debate over teh internet what anybody hears or not. ? |
Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?
Unless there is a need for a high pass filter, using a larger coupling cap won't hurt. Something that's often forgotten is the series reactance of a cap is a noise source, just like a series resistance. So if your coupling cap is 3dB down at 50Hz working into , say, 1K ohm, it has a noise contribution at 50HZ same as a 1K resistor. Even at 500Hz, it contributes as much noise as a 100 ohm resistor. In a mic, there is a tradeoff between noise and the need to high pass filter thumps and plosives.
The noise audibility is reduced by the Fletcher-Munson effect, but it's still there on spectral plots of many mics. I use larger caps than most engineers, because I think I can hear that LF noise. |
Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?
Understood. That last explanation about Bipolar was really refreshing from the old days, thanks!
Why people don't use? 10uf? 63V, or even 10uf 100V? Is it only for the space it takes physically inside the XLR connector or there is something related that can affect the frequency response?? Cheers |
Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?
An aluminum electrolytic capacitor consists of two Al foil electrodes separated by a conductive electrolyte. Al forms an oxide coating on the surface on contact with air or water, and the oxide coating is the dielectric of the capacitor. So an Al electrolytic consists of two caps in series, one at the anode and one at the cathode. The anode is formed with the thicker oxide, is high voltage and lesser capacitance. The cathode is low voltage, a volt or two, and very high capacitance. The over all result is two caps in series, of which the anode primarily determines the voltage and capacity. It turns out the cathode contributes most of the tiny distortion to any signal passing through.
This is where it gets interesting. Bipolar electrolytics are NOT made as two polar caps in series. Bipolar caps have two anodes and no cathodes. Bipolar caps exhibit much less distortion than polar caps in audio coupling circuits. So to answer the OP question, bipolar caps are fine. They are actually preferred if they can be had in the desired voltage and capacity. They exhibit more than an order of magnitude less distortion. They are physically larger, because the two anodes in series have to be larger to reach the same capacity, but otherwise they are better, even in circuits where the polarity applied never changes. Let me add that capacitor distortion is likely to be the least contributor to the sound of a mic, but still . . . |
Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?
We are probably worrying about nothing TBH. Jules @ Sound Sleuth designs excellent circuits, if he says it's good, it'll likely be good.
I can only see a problem if you're intending on capturing low frequencies (e.g. 30Hz) and feeding it into a mixer with low input impedance on its mic channel (e.g. <1000 ohms). If your mixer / sound card mic input is decent it'll have >1500 Ohm on its input and so you won't see a problem. |
Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe other issue is size of the capacitor. ?I¡¯m the 3.3uF 63V guy. ?They work great and physically allow you to build the SimpleP48 into the XLR connector. ?I use this with my ZoomF6. ?Best Regards, Jules Ryckebusch? On Apr 21, 2022, at 07:51, a45porhora@... wrote:
|
Re: Bipolar condenser for P48 basic with EM272?
Thanks for the explanation Michael,
the point about tolerance is really good. My plan is to connect that Mic's via XLR to a new Zoom F3, but better for a capacitor rated for at least 50V like this one: https://www.mouser.es/ProductDetail/Nichicon/UKW1H4R7MDD1TA?qs=WJSLByB5Mu28FaeGBvn6BQ%3D%3D About low frecuencies: Reading this: ?he says? ?The capacitor can be 1uF to 4.7uF without noticeable change in sound. I am using 3.3uFWhat do you think about this? Cheers |