开云体育

HI gang... Several people have written that they would appreciate something about 1/2 in diam. The old engineering thing in me asks, what would happen if you took 4 capsules and wrapped them together

Well you are a lucky man Dick, I just got my hands on the first stab at a WM-60, I have ten and I am not going to get my test gear until January (and then I have to figure out how it works). So, I'm

LOL... NO preorders don't help. I'll make some, seed a bunch to those who added their input and if they get the seal of approval, then I'll stock some, THEN I will accept paid orders, not before. THEN

I would like pc mount wires coming out of it so I can build an array of a dozen quickly. Arranged so they would plug right into a solderless or solder breadboard where the IC's go (so 0.1 inch spacing

Me too! I prefer the WM60 style with the 5mm deep can. This also gives you more choices on FET packaging behind the back plate. I will place an order once the final pricing is announced, probably for

i would like to see it in two sizes one as small as possible, and the other about 1/2 diameter.The small one as omni, and the larger one both omni and cardioid. i would like to see, instead of a the

Sounds great. You can plan on getting an order from me!

Hey thanks for helping, I need these too and my knowledge is pretty full of holes, I just own the factory and spew out copies of commodity stuff, I don't have an acoustics degree and I'm not a

I don't know, you tell me. I just make them. Remember it has to fit a 5mm D PCB wrote: OK? you substitute a fixed gain hi quality opamp? It would would it limit flexibility?

should be around digi small quan 61 prices wrote: was will

mstrong82 wrote: Both are useful -- 60 for loud, 61 for less loud. 61s are potentially more useful since they work into line-in for some range of loud. Yes. 3-pad with best FET practical. Again, I'd

Must it be a FET? Wouldn't it be almost as simple and provide better S/N if you substitute a fixed gain hi quality opamp? It would provide lower output impedance that would help kill line noise. Then

mstrong82 wrote: Cool. Understood. Agreed. That's the theory but the definitive test comparing self noise at atmospheric to self noise in a vacuum would really help put the issue to bed if anyone has

Thanks, you are doing great at balancing the feelings of the group against what is a dream and what is too expensive. You are also moving very fast which is both great and not something you have to

This all sounds great. Any idea what these things will cost? on 12/8/03 3:20 PM, mstrong82 at mstrong@... wrote:

No, I haven't eliminated anything as far as directional or size. Someone was interested in better 55's, others in 1/2", etc. All are interesting. I must focus on getting one thing at a time done, or

--- mstrong82 <mstrong@...> wrote: I think something that would be really great would be a capsule that ran off of 48v, so it could easily be run off phantom power. I know a lot of

--- Indrek Rebane <indrek@...> wrote: Have you done that? There's not a lot of clearance between the face and the diaphragm. I don't think I would have much luck doing that sort of thing,

Bob Rogers wrote: Actually as capsules are made of quite thin aluminum, you can easily cut hole larger with sharp scalpel (which will not be so sharp after performing this mod). Indrek -- Indrek

--- dnemeth01 <dnemeth01@...> wrote: Depending on your definition of "larger," you can cut the fronts of entirely fairly easily. I suppose it would be possible to drill a larger