Sounds great. You can plan on getting an order from me!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "mstrong82" <mstrong@...>
To: <micbuilders@...>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:58 PM
Subject: [micbuilders] Re: WM-60/61 Final Input Please - cost
should be around digi small quan 61 prices
--- In micbuilders@..., Bob Andres <robert.andres@c...>
wrote:
This all sounds great. Any idea what these things will cost?
on 12/8/03 3:20 PM, mstrong82 at mstrong@j... wrote:
No, I haven't eliminated anything as far as directional or size.
Someone
was
interested in better 55's, others in 1/2", etc. All are interesting.
I must focus on getting one thing at a time done, or nothing will
happen.
Just
made some 60 equals, but people are saying that 61 is much preferred.
I think 3 pads, and the best FET that will fit.
I am hearing no FET and fooling with a 6mm RF mic won't help noise,
but
will
help LF, which seems flat anyway... so no non FET version
The remaining question I am aware of is the hole size, normal, bigger
or
none. I am hearing people that have experimented with making the hole
bigger, who have actually tested the results find no improvement and
in
fact
degradation of the low end. One guy was saying the cavity resonates
at
extremely high SPL's, (over 120?) That's not a problem for me, anyone
else?
ALSO, part of the purpose of the hole and the metal around it is to
protect
the
membrane, which DOES need protection.
I WANT FINAL INPUT AND THOUGHTS, PLEASE
61 better starting point than 60?
3 pad w/ best FET available? Any preferences on FET #? Sanyo 202
OK?
NEC 1109-J34 or J36? Anything else?
Bigger omni next, but first let's finish this one. I can fit a 2SK118
in a
9.7mm
and should be able to tweak 65 S/N out of it, without too much sweat.
We
shall see.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
micbuilders-unsubscribe@...
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
micbuilders-unsubscribe@...
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
