Re: Mach4 laser settings
Thanks Spenser, I understand
By
Chuck Kahler
·
#155323
·
|
Re: Mach4 laser settings
Thanks Steve,
I posted in the warp9 forum.
chuck
By
Chuck Kahler
·
#155322
·
|
Re: Mach4 laser settings
Chuck,
That is what I thought. However if you want to get a response you need to provide gcode in an easy way to vie, not a jpg of part of the code. Also you need to phrase the question so it can be
By
[email protected] <spencer@...>
·
#155321
·
|
Re: Mach4 laser settings
Spenser,
Rather than referring to input, I should be saying response from my previous post
chuck
By
Chuck Kahler
·
#155320
·
|
Re: Mach4 laser settings
Spenser,
The “input” I’m talking about is “input” from the initial post I made on this subject.
I think you’ll understand what I’m looking for.
Thanks,
Chuck
By
Chuck Kahler
·
#155319
·
|
Re: Mach4 laser settings
Warp9TD.com runs a support forum for the ESS and offers good technical support there.
You do have to creat an account in order to post there, but it is worth it.
By
Steve Stallings
·
#155318
·
|
Tuna machdrives bra brc
Hi am having trouble with the tuning of the drive I think it's in the settings the information is a bit hard to understand .. I can't get the settings right so I can start the tuning.this is what I
By
markoldfosterau
·
#155317
·
|
Re: Mach4 laser settings
don't send gcode as jpg if you expect anyone to read it. send as text. what do you mean by "input" help? people are not going to spend their time trying to figure out what you are doing/asking. what
By
[email protected] <spencer@...>
·
#155316
·
|
Re: Mach4 laser settings
Since I am not getting any input, let me try to simplify my concern.
I am running Mach4 using ESS.
I have output #2 configured with Port 2 Pin 16 to fire my laser utilizing the M 62 and M 63
By
Chuck Kahler
·
#155315
·
|
Re: Mach4 laser settings
Here are the photos that did not show up in the original post
By
Chuck Kahler
·
#155314
·
|
Mach4 laser settings
Let me explain:
Based on this taken from warp 9 ESS set-up instructions for Mach4;
“…..M62P#s allow the precise starting of the laser with the starting of a G00, G01, G02 or G03 based motion
By
Chuck Kahler
·
#155312
·
|
Re: CraftCNC uses a Dremel 3000
There is nothing controlling the Dremmel ON/OFF or spindle speed.
Your steps motors are driven with a controller which reads if not standard G-Code a similar language to move the XYZ axis by increment
By
Theodore
·
#155311
·
|
Re: CraftCNC uses a Dremel 3000
https://forum.vectric.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=40217
I made an inquiry on the vectric forum and have not received a response.... fwiw...
Tamra
By
Tamra
·
#155310
·
|
Re: CraftCNC uses a Dremel 3000
I think we are telling Mach 3, what the stepper motors capabilities are limited to, and I also want to limit my x,y,z axis.
Am I on the right path?
Thanks,
Tamra
By
Tamra
·
#155309
·
|
Re: CraftCNC uses a Dremel 3000
Tamara,
Vectric has drivers available that will put out Mach-3 compatible G-code.
Bertho
Sent: 22 August, 2022 22:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MachCNC] CraftCNC uses a Dremel 3000
I'm
By
Bertho
·
#155308
·
|
CraftCNC uses a Dremel 3000
I'm almost finished 3d Printing the parts for this free project that I found on Design and Make's website.? I started printing 10 days ago, and should be
finished by next Sunday or sooner, so the
By
Tamra
·
#155306
·
|
Re: single block
Hi Joemac,
It is the OLD way of testing a program .. You would load up the file and press single block a million times to dry run the file and make sure the Dist to go is correct and all that jazz.
By
Brian Barker
·
#155305
·
|
Re: single block
Executing the program one line at a time.
By
Chuck Kahler
·
#155304
·
|
Re: single block
OK OK I looked it up,,,, thanks ?
Sent from my Atari 2600
Regards,
-Joemac
Sent: August 4, 2022 8:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] single block
Er ummmmm, what is single
By
Joe Macmurchie
·
#155303
·
|
Re: single block
Er ummmmm, what is single block…?
Sent from my Atari 2600
Regards,
-Joemac
Sent: August 4, 2022 4:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MachCNC] single block
Hi,
A redo of single block was
By
Joe Macmurchie
·
#155302
·
|