Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Steve, you have earned my respect. You was precise in your analysis.
I believe that the key for mass-adoption of M17 is the price. Yes, it is difficult to have gain of scale with new products, but it
By
Luzem¨¢rio
·
#63
·
|
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Canadian Radiocommunication Regulations
SOR/96-484
PART V Requirements for the Operation of Radio Apparatus Operation in
the Amateur Radio Service
Technical Requirements
Communications with Radio
By
Peter Laws
·
#62
·
|
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Yes, this could set a new standard for on air applications.? And before
the bush lawyers get all huffy, cryptographic signing should be legal in
most jurisdictions, because the prohibition is usually
By
Tony Langdon
·
#61
·
|
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
I also subscribed today. You have a lot of great information!
73,
Bob KB6CIO
Sent from my not so smart phone. Please excuse typos, auto-correct
disasters, and fat-fingering
By
ROBERT KLIMAN KB6CIO
·
#60
·
|
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Tony:
Thanks for jumping in and adding detail, especially...
Oops¡ I forgot to mention the new capability to cryptographically sign
transmissions (and thus, authenticate a transmission). That is
By
Steve Stroh <steve@...>
·
#59
·
|
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Hopefully we'll be able to navigate a way through the transition to a
paid list.? Certainly more of us subscribing to Zero Retries would be a
good start. :)
In between sport (and possibly work), I'll
By
Tony Langdon
·
#58
·
|
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Pete:
That wasn¡¯t the intent, but Thanks!
Steve N8GNJ
Steve Stroh N8GNJ (he / him / his)
Editor
Zero Retries Newsletter - https://www.zeroretries.org
Radios are Computers - With
By
Steve Stroh N8GNJ
·
#57
·
|
Re: Brief update on M17-Users
Just the nudge I needed to subscribe to ZR!
By
Pete St. Marie
·
#56
·
|
Brief update on M17-Users
Apologies for my not being more of a presence on this list. Zero Retries is
my priority and I¡¯m still not done with my ¡°big M17 article¡±, which I will
post here in addition to Zero Retries when
By
Steve Stroh N8GNJ
·
#55
·
|
Re: One I missed (M17 hardware/software)
I don't need Linux advocacy, I've used a number of desktop
configurations over the past 30 years.? However, while each had its
strengths, and some are now quite good, there were always some
By
Tony Langdon
·
#54
·
|
Re: One I missed (M17 hardware/software)
I have used several desktops. It's a matter of get used to where each thing is.
Believe me, you will use the lightest one at the end... today, after 25 years of using Linux only (no Windows,
By
Luzem¨¢rio
·
#53
·
|
Re: One I missed (M17 hardware/software)
Nice idea in theory, but I don't have much in the way of Linux on the
desktop.? Almost all of my Linux systems are headless servers, with
several in the cloud, but none of these are geared up for
By
Tony Langdon
·
#52
·
|
Re: Introduction
Welcome aboard Luzemario.? You've got a good setup by the looks of it.?
Enjoy M17. :)
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
By
Tony Langdon
·
#51
·
|
Re: One I missed (M17 hardware/software)
Hi Tony,
Just give Linux a try, it helped me a lot. Even older machines that I have seen, yelds acceptable results. You can try it while the devs rewrite the Windows version.
73 de PR7LDR
By
Luzem¨¢rio
·
#50
·
Edited
|
Re: Introduction
Hi, folks
My name is Luzemario, my call is PR7LDR.
I just folded my parachute into the M17 world, because I think it's going to be the future of digital ham radio.
I have a module17 paired with
By
Luzem¨¢rio
·
#49
·
Edited
|
One I missed (M17 hardware/software)
In the list of M17 hardware/software, I neglected to mention M17tools,
which can use audio devices to generate M17 baseband.? One conveniently
packaged hardware device is the Digirig, which can pass
By
Tony Langdon
·
#48
·
|
Re: Introduction
Happy to help. :)
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
By
Tony Langdon
·
#47
·
|
Re: Introduction
<vk3jed@...> wrote:
TAPR was the clue!
https://tapr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019-2-SV9OAN.pdf
--
Peter Laws | VE[23]UWY / N5UWY | plaws0 gmail com | Travel by Train!
By
Peter Laws
·
#46
·
|
Re: Repeater Builder RB_STM32_DVM V4 supports M17
Further on this, there's a couple of videos on YouTube, where I
demonstrate M17 using M17Client and a FT-818.? M17Client is actually
running on the RB_STM32_DVM V4 board.? I'll have to dig up the
By
Tony Langdon
·
#45
·
|
Re: Repeater Builder RB_STM32_DVM V4 supports M17
I've had one running M17 for a couple of years at least.? Of course,
back then, I had to build the firmware from source to get M17 support.
I have both the RB board and the BI7JTA V3F4.? The only
By
Tony Langdon
·
#44
·
|