开云体育

*1. Should Israel be charged with war crimes for attacking Gaza?* No, although I am unconcerned with various watchdogs looking into incidents. The overall war effort is an almost inevitable outcome of

. 1.? Should Israel be charged with war crimes for attacking Gaza? ? Of course not. Defending your country against a vicious invading enemy is not a war crime. Trying to rescue your people being

Yes, of course. It is already apparent the Kamala Harris is doing better than Trump is. Nobody of any consequence No, he's doing a fine job. We already know it will be Kamala Harris. Aloha, Celeste

1.? Should Israel be charged with war crimes for attacking Gaza? No.? Hamas has declared a war of annihilation and Israel is defending itself.? Hamas can stop the attacks on civilians any time they

1. Should Israel be charged with war crimes for attacking Gaza? Netanyahu should be the one charged with war crimes, and possibly some of his war cabinet and generals. 2/ Will the new candidate have a

*UIET.) 1. Should Israel be charged with war crimes for attacking Gaza?* No. Although some individual IDF personnel may qualify for criminal charges as this is unfortunately a repeating phenomenon in

1.? Should Israel be charged with war crimes for attacking Gaza? 2/? Will the new candidate have a better, worse or same chance against Trump? 3.? If somehow Trump withdrew who would be most likely

No... that would make no sense. No, that would be stupid. Deemed is the wrong word. Someone unqualified stated their worthless opinion. Yes, neither has much significance. She wasn't any age because

*1. Will the assassination attempt on Trump affect the election?* I feel confident, without any objective metrics to present, that it already has. It will be drawn out, spun and woven into a banner to

1.? Will the assassination attempt on Trump effect the election? Yes - but exactly how is still up in the air. 2.? Should government's use of weapons be restricted to the same degree as private

No... that would make no sense. No, that would be stupid. Deemed is the wrong word. Someone unqualified stated their worthless opinion. Yes, neither has much significance. She wasn't any age because

1.? Will the assassination attempt on Trump efffect the election? 2.? Should government's use of weapons be restricted to the same degree as private individuals? 3.? ?Should a person who has been

1,? What was the most overrated speech in recent history? . FDR's - "All we have to fear is fear itself" 2.? What was the most underappreciated speech in recent history? Lincoln's Gett ysburg

1.? What was the most significant executive order ever issued by a president of the US? FDR putting Japanese citizens in our version of concentration camps may well have been the stupidest but I

i ? 1.? What was the most significant executive order ever issued by a president of the US? My first thought was, I have no idea. But answering a week late, I got to read other’s responses, all of

1. Should a president be allowed to make law by executive order? No. And my understanding is, they can’t. They can only set regulations for existing government organizations? But that may have

*1. What was the most significant executive order ever issued by a president of the US?* I had to look this up. Creating the Office of Homeland Security might have been a warning sign for times to

I have to agree with Celeste on the "most significant executive order." FDR's order to send US citizens to concentration camps based on their race was appalling, useless, and racist, and direct

Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation No, there's no good reason for him to drop out. There are moral codes everywhere and they have similarities, but they are not the same. Not a lot Yes. Drone

1. What was the most significant executive order ever issued by a president of the US? FDR's order to intern people of Japanese ancestry 2. Will Joe Biden drop out of the race for reelection? Yes,