开云体育

...according to Majorie Taylor Greene, in. a speech yesterday here in Nevada: https://apple.news/ABchf0lUvSv-nvMw5m76PvQ

David, It will never be completely harmonious, but there is usually consensus. Aloha, Celeste

You and Rhonda make good points, but self-destructive culture can get out of hand, and highly addictive drugs can be viewed as a public health issue, like an epidemic. Over 100,000 people are dying

Darrell G King, MA, RN Rochester, NY, US DarrellGKing@... *David*: "...If the great majority of Chicagoans were murderers and thieves, making laws there for murdering and stealing would make

<<You could argue that two or four ways and be logically correct. Laws are made, ideally, not for logical reasons but because the great majority feel that they need to be made. If the great majority

<<Traffic lights and stop signs and speed limits control drivers' decisions, but if you don't drive they don't affect your life, except that if there is no regulation of traffic the odds are good that

The moral consensus in a community will never be completely harmonious. Humans are not mass produced machines.

// Both of these epidemics happened in large part because of drug prohibition. // You could argue that two or four ways and be logically correct. Laws are made, ideally, not for logical reasons but

// we live in a society where busybodies want to control other people’s decisions, even though those decisions have no bearing on their own life // Traffic lights and stop signs and speed limits

Darrell, I agree that morality is somewhat subjective. Not entirely, though, because we are not the only ones in our world. Morality does involve the others around us and in our community. Aloha,

I might argue that morality is subjective, Celeste. Personally, for instance, I feel sex lives are the problems of those living those lives and I do not care if they bribe people to cover their dirty

<<Well, you must have missed the crack epidemic, but fentanyl is reaching more communities, and we're in for another wild ride, since the government is unwilling or unable to control this one, too.>>

<< Legal malpractice? How about accounting malpractice and independent auditor malpractice? Trump didn't personally make those 36 journal entries.>> Since Trump has not sued his accountant or

Legal malpractice? How about accounting malpractice and independent auditor malpractice? Trump didn't personally make those 36 journal entries. [email protected]> wrote:

Well, you must have missed the crack epidemic, but fentanyl is reaching more communities, and we're in for another wild ride, since the government is unwilling or unable to control this one, too.

<<She blackmailed him. It's more plausible that the accusation would destroy his marriage.>> The evidence presented at trial (which neither Trump nor his lawyer refuted at the trial,) was that the

<<How does anyone know what his motive was, and whether he committed adultery>> That is a good point. As far as I know, Trump has never denied nor confirmed his affair with Daniels. And Trump’s

<<First the conviction is in question because of the judge's insane instructions - they didn't have to agree on what crime he committed.>> There was nothing “insane” about the judge’s jury

<<Are you arguing that if X percent of people disobey a law, it's a bad law? Or are you arguing that if the cost of enforcing a law is higher than Y, the law should be eliminated? Or you arguing that

Same teaching; repeated in two gospels. The point is that no one lives a biblical life; everyone strays from the ideal. Ed [email protected]> wrote: