¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Meridian flip with N.I.N.A

 

Yes; the first suggestion was about the pierside-setting and the second?suggestion was to implement a pause before the meridian

i played around and testes it again last night, but the mount is not moving!!!

So i went back to SGP and everything works fine :-)


Re: Bellville question

 

Hi Tom,

The reason the Belleville discs improve PE is that they force the bearings to rotate in a predictable way with the motion of the worm. Left to their own devices the ball bearings tend to stall then start again in unpredictable ways likely when the clearances are taken up by misalignment in the worm and bearings. Placing a light load on bearings is a well documented mechanical engineering practice for precision mechanisms and many bearing manufacturers have engineering notes on the practice. That is how I found out about this many years ago when I applied the idea to my HEQ5-Pro/Sirius and EQ6/Atlas mounts 6-7 years ago back in my EQMOD says.?

Another good idea I had but didn't try due to updating to OPWs was to fix the worm blocks to the worm cover to in essence make the cover a rigid bridge between the blocks to make backlash easier to do. The way to do this would be to use a pin on the top and cut a slight recess under the existing grub screws on the cover to set the blocks in the cover well aligned with the outer bearing which is being preloaded by the Bellevue disc. By bridging the blocks they would move as one making backlash easier to set well. The other thing to try to achieve is to locate the gearbox output shaft as closely on axis as possible with the worm shaft.??

--

Chip Louie - Chief Daydreamer Imagination Hardware


Re: Meridian flip with N.I.N.A

Jim Waters
 
Edited

Did you get an answer from NINA Discord?

EDIT - I just found the Discord reply's.


Re: Ovision worm on new G11G

 

Hi Sabastian,
I have old G11 (2005) non goto, later fitted with onstep. Used ovision on this one for a long time. Everythig just works nicely for Photography. Now going for a new G11G. Was planning to fit ovision worm from old mount on to the new mount just incase there was any benefit.?

Thanks Brian for replying.?
I think then I will first check the performance of new mount then will take a call on swapping the gear.

Regards,
Nilesh Desai


On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, 12:34 am Brian Valente, <bvalente@...> wrote:
Hi Sebastian

Personally I think the current shipping mounts are as good or better than ovision (particularly with factory-stock spring loaded worm)

Brian

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:20 AM Sebastian Kotulski <sebkotulski@...> wrote:
I think ,? Ovision worm block is no more available.



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Re: How to adjust AR and DEC worms ?

Keith N
 

Hi Thomas.? Here's what I do with the two-bearing-block configuration:

  1. Remove the cover plate, and screw in the two set screws so that they are inset a little bit (will be using the cover in a later step).
  2. Loosen the Oldham coupler set screws (4).
  3. Tighten the 2 bearing block screws underneath until they are barely snug (but still able to rotate a bit).
  4. Put a feeler gauge behind the right block.
  5. Use one of the cover plate flat sides to simultaneously push both bearing blocks toward the mount (the cover is meant to keep the blocks colinear) while simultaneously pushing the right block toward the gearbox (either pushing the right block directly, and/or rotating the DEC axis to move the worm gear toward the gearbox; I believe Scott shows this in one of his Youtube videos).
  6. Tighten up the bearing block screws underneath (not too tight).
  7. Tighten the worm-side Oldham set screws, and use this to rotate the worm by hand through a large range (ideally 360deg).? If there is any binding, use a thicker feeler gauge and repeat (or thinner if you want a tighter mesh).
  8. If there is any side-to-side movement of the worm, try again and eliminate.
  9. Loosen the Oldham set screws.
  10. Loosen the gearbox screws and adjust/rotate the gearbox (typically the 'ears' are a bit larger than the screw diameter, or even drill these larger if need be) until the gearbox shaft is colinear to the worm gear as best as you can, then tighten the gearbox screws.
  11. Move the two ends of the Oldham coupler toward each other to minimize any gaps, then tighten the Oldham set screws (one of them on the gearbox side should be set to the flat part of the gearbox shaft).
  12. Power up the mount and try to slew. Observe the runout of the Oldham coupler and adjust the gearbox if it doesn't seem in line (nylon coupling disc offset from either of the hubs).
  13. If the DEC assembly strains/stalls when slewing, back off the worm mesh (thicker feeler gauge) and repeat.? If you experience excessive backlash while imaging, try to tighten the mesh (thinner feeler gauge) and/or double-check that there isn't any lateral (side to side) movement of the worm in the bearing blocks.
That's the gist of it anyway.? Losmandy uses JetLube MP-50 grease, many here recommend Superlube synthetic grease with syncolon.

Keith


Re: High Precision Brass Worm

wa1vta01452
 

Thanks? Keith.


Re: Sidereal vs King rate

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Sonny,

You can live in a democracy and still have a King or a Queen for that matter, they are not mutually exclusive :)

Paul




On 14 Jul 2020, at 6:02:27 am, Sonny Edmonds <sonnyedmonds@...> wrote:

Since I live in a democracy, I stay away from King rate.
I think it is Imperialistic...

But, I could be wrong. ;^)

--
SonnyE


(I suggest viewed in full screen)


Re: Sidereal vs King rate

Sonny Edmonds
 

Since I live in a democracy, I stay away from King rate.
I think it is Imperialistic...

But, I could be wrong. ;^)

--
SonnyE


(I suggest viewed in full screen)


How to adjust AR and DEC worms ?

 

Hi, I'm a new member, I wanted to ask for advice on adjusting the AR and DEC worm screw with independent bearings on a Losmandy G11, how can I perform a reliable registration? Do I use a feeler gauge? Which lubricant is recommended for Losmandy frames?


Re: High Precision Brass Worm

Keith N
 

Yes it will.

Keith


Re: Ovision worm on new G11G

 

Hi Sebastian

Personally I think the current shipping mounts are as good or better than ovision (particularly with factory-stock spring loaded worm)

Brian

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:20 AM Sebastian Kotulski <sebkotulski@...> wrote:
I think ,? Ovision worm block is no more available.



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Re: Ovision worm on new G11G

 

I think ,? Ovision worm block is no more available.


High Precision Brass Worm

wa1vta01452
 

(Now that I ordered it), can someone confirm the HPW will fit early G11 mounts?

Thanks,
Tom


Ovision worm on new G11G

 

Hello Everyone,

Can the Ovision worm block be fitted on the new G11G if I decide to remove OPW?
Or is it not required and new OPW provides just as good results?

Regards,
Nilesh Desai


Re: Finally, some better results - M39 and M29

 

Congrats Sebastian! Glad your efforts have paid off with improved imaging.?


Re: Sidereal vs King rate

 

Hi Jamie

it's kind of six of one, half dozen of another

generally most folks use sidereal. King Rate accounts for atmospheric refraction but isn't terribly helpful if you are imaging higher in the sky (>30 degrees?)?

Guiding usually takes care of any changes in apparent star motion as well

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:21 PM Jamie Amendolagine <jamie.amendolagine@...> wrote:
So which choice is better for imaging? Or are there situations where one is better than the other??

Jamie



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Meridian flip with N.I.N.A

 

Hello,?
i changed from SGP to N.I.N.A because it's free and a good concept!
The last two nights i tested N.I.N.A.?and shoot some images of M57; most of the things are really working fine.
The only thing that's not running is the meridian flip with my G11/Gemini II:
N.I.N.A.?'runs' though the meridian flip sequence and act as if the mount has flipped, plate solve etc. but the mount will not flip to other side!!!

Any ideas what is missing, see my Gemini II and NINA-Settings?



Thanks for help
Dietmar


Re: Going Auto with N.I.N.A

 

Hallo SonnyE,

i also changed from SGP to N.I.N.A. and i also went through the videos from CUIV; very helpful at the beginning because several things have to be configured in several diffent places. For me not so intuitive as SGP; but i like the concept and that it's free.
The last two nights i tested N.I.N.A.?an shoot some images of M57; most of the things are working fine.
The only thing that's NOT running is the meridian flip with my G11/Gemini II: N.I.N.A.?'runs' though the meridian flip sequence and act as if the mount has flipped, plate solve etc. and the mount will move slightly to the position prior to where I originally centered the object but will not flip to other side!!!

Did you try a meridian flip or any ideas what is missing?

Dietmar


Gemini II and Meridiian Flip using NINA

 

Hello,
i tried to use NINA instead of SGP for capturing my astrophotos because it¡®s free and seems to be a good concept.
but the ladt two nights i tried to manage a meridian flip, but the mount is not moving, not flipping.
in SGP everything works fine, so i think my settings shoul be okay!?
any ideas that can help??
Dietmar


Re: Sidereal vs King rate

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

For most solar system objects, neither rate is correct so it doesn¡¯t much matter which you use.?

If you¡¯re shooting short subs, it won¡¯t matter because the rates are very close, and aligning the subs will compensate for differences due to refraction.?

If you¡¯re shooting long subs, you should be auto guiding, so it won¡¯t matter which you use for the base tracking rate. ?

If you¡¯re using a 492 digital drive, its King rate is just an average refraction compensation, not particularly accurate for most positions. ?King rate should be marginally better, but really you want to either shoot short subs or auto guide. ?Or both. ?

I don¡¯t know if the Gemini implements position-dependent King rate; if so, it would in principle be better for unguided imaging with subs on the order of a minute or longer. ?In any case, if the mount is properly set up, King rate shouldn¡¯t be any worse than sidereal for objects outside the solar system. ?

? -Les



On 12 Jul 2020, at 22:20, Jamie Amendolagine <jamie.amendolagine@...> wrote:

So which choice is better for imaging? Or are there situations where one is better than the other??

Jamie