Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Losmandy_users
- Messages
Search
Re: Bellville question
Hi Tom,
The reason the Belleville discs improve PE is that they force the bearings to rotate in a predictable way with the motion of the worm. Left to their own devices the ball bearings tend to stall then start again in unpredictable ways likely when the clearances are taken up by misalignment in the worm and bearings. Placing a light load on bearings is a well documented mechanical engineering practice for precision mechanisms and many bearing manufacturers have engineering notes on the practice. That is how I found out about this many years ago when I applied the idea to my HEQ5-Pro/Sirius and EQ6/Atlas mounts 6-7 years ago back in my EQMOD says.? Another good idea I had but didn't try due to updating to OPWs was to fix the worm blocks to the worm cover to in essence make the cover a rigid bridge between the blocks to make backlash easier to do. The way to do this would be to use a pin on the top and cut a slight recess under the existing grub screws on the cover to set the blocks in the cover well aligned with the outer bearing which is being preloaded by the Bellevue disc. By bridging the blocks they would move as one making backlash easier to set well. The other thing to try to achieve is to locate the gearbox output shaft as closely on axis as possible with the worm shaft.?? -- Chip Louie - Chief Daydreamer Imagination Hardware |
Re: Ovision worm on new G11G
Hi Sabastian, I have old G11 (2005) non goto, later fitted with onstep. Used ovision on this one for a long time. Everythig just works nicely for Photography. Now going for a new G11G. Was planning to fit ovision worm from old mount on to the new mount just incase there was any benefit.? Thanks Brian for replying.? I think then I will first check the performance of new mount then will take a call on swapping the gear. Regards, Nilesh Desai On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, 12:34 am Brian Valente, <bvalente@...> wrote:
|
Re: How to adjust AR and DEC worms ?
Keith N
Hi Thomas.? Here's what I do with the two-bearing-block configuration:
Keith |
Re: Sidereal vs King rate
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSonny,You can live in a democracy and still have a King or a Queen for that matter, they are not mutually exclusive :) Paul
|
Re: Ovision worm on new G11G
Hi Sebastian Personally I think the current shipping mounts are as good or better than ovision (particularly with factory-stock spring loaded worm) Brian On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:20 AM Sebastian Kotulski <sebkotulski@...> wrote: I think ,? Ovision worm block is no more available. --
Brian? Brian Valente portfolio |
Re: Sidereal vs King rate
Hi Jamie it's kind of six of one, half dozen of another generally most folks use sidereal. King Rate accounts for atmospheric refraction but isn't terribly helpful if you are imaging higher in the sky (>30 degrees?)? Guiding usually takes care of any changes in apparent star motion as well On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:21 PM Jamie Amendolagine <jamie.amendolagine@...> wrote: So which choice is better for imaging? Or are there situations where one is better than the other?? --
Brian? Brian Valente portfolio |
Meridian flip with N.I.N.A
Hello,?
i changed from SGP to N.I.N.A because it's free and a good concept! The last two nights i tested N.I.N.A.?and shoot some images of M57; most of the things are really working fine. The only thing that's not running is the meridian flip with my G11/Gemini II: N.I.N.A.?'runs' though the meridian flip sequence and act as if the mount has flipped, plate solve etc. but the mount will not flip to other side!!! Any ideas what is missing, see my Gemini II and NINA-Settings? Thanks for help Dietmar |
Re: Going Auto with N.I.N.A
Hallo SonnyE,
i also changed from SGP to N.I.N.A. and i also went through the videos from CUIV; very helpful at the beginning because several things have to be configured in several diffent places. For me not so intuitive as SGP; but i like the concept and that it's free. The last two nights i tested N.I.N.A.?an shoot some images of M57; most of the things are working fine. The only thing that's NOT running is the meridian flip with my G11/Gemini II: N.I.N.A.?'runs' though the meridian flip sequence and act as if the mount has flipped, plate solve etc. and the mount will move slightly to the position prior to where I originally centered the object but will not flip to other side!!! Did you try a meridian flip or any ideas what is missing? Dietmar |
Gemini II and Meridiian Flip using NINA
Hello,
i tried to use NINA instead of SGP for capturing my astrophotos because it¡®s free and seems to be a good concept. but the ladt two nights i tried to manage a meridian flip, but the mount is not moving, not flipping. in SGP everything works fine, so i think my settings shoul be okay!? any ideas that can help?? Dietmar |
Re: Sidereal vs King rate
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýFor most solar system objects, neither rate is correct so it doesn¡¯t much matter which you use.?If you¡¯re shooting short subs, it won¡¯t matter because the rates are very close, and aligning the subs will compensate for differences due to refraction.? If you¡¯re shooting long subs, you should be auto guiding, so it won¡¯t matter which you use for the base tracking rate. ? If you¡¯re using a 492 digital drive, its King rate is just an average refraction compensation, not particularly accurate for most positions. ?King rate should be marginally better, but really you want to either shoot short subs or auto guide. ?Or both. ? I don¡¯t know if the Gemini implements position-dependent King rate; if so, it would in principle be better for unguided imaging with subs on the order of a minute or longer. ?In any case, if the mount is properly set up, King rate shouldn¡¯t be any worse than sidereal for objects outside the solar system. ? ? -Les
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss