¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

The scope thinks it's the southern hemisphere as shown in this pic, where it? should be sayings it's in the blue zone. By rotating the Dec access pointing to the north it will again show its correct location. With Dec in this location it suddenly? decided oh I'm am in the northern hemisphere at 353 degrees Az and the target jumps to the correct location. Is this a problem with me, you or Rene?


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 06:09 AM, Paul Kanevsky wrote:
So when crossing over 353 deg in Az, RA jumps by 7 hours? Is? that while tracking or when doing a goto? Did you confirm if that happens on the physical hand controller as well as in the driver display?
Yes, that's right. Yes now using the hand controller. So the mount does this if tracking, but you can also slew Ra to the boundary transition point with the? hand controller. Driver display shows the same thing as the hand controller.

Peter


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

Paul,

With the scope at the eastern limit of 90 degrees, the Az value reads 346 degrees. Slewing past the boundary value of 353 degrees? the value suddenly jumps to something in the 200s.?

Peter


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:55 AM, <pcboreland@...> wrote:
The jump occurs when you cross over the 353 degree boundary in Az.
So when crossing over 353 deg in Az, RA jumps by 7 hours? Is? that while tracking or when doing a goto? Did you confirm if that happens on the physical hand controller as well as in the driver display?


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

The jump occurs when you cross over the 353 degree boundary in Az.


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:36 AM, <pcboreland@...> wrote:
I have no model. I always cold start Gemini.? This problem has existed for months with many restarts/resets. During galaxy seasons target always ended up in this part of the sky, this is when I noticed the flip was failing.?
I'm not thinking about the flip failing, but the RA coordinate jumping from 2h to 15h after a small move. Flips are performed by Gemini. ASCOM Driver just sends the command to perform one.


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

I have no model. I always cold start Gemini.? This problem has existed for months with many restarts/resets. During galaxy seasons target always ended up in this part of the sky, this is when I noticed the flip was failing.?


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

Try to clear out and reset any model that you may have in Gemini, cold start, or even fully reset Gemini to make sure.

Regards,

? ? ?-Paul


On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 07:59 AM, <pcboreland@...> wrote:
Paul,

I've found a boundary condition were my meridian flip fails. The scope stays on the west side and ends up pointing at the ground. Any thoughts by folks in the group would be appreciated. I do not know if this is a settings problem or a bug someplace??
?
If I slew to a coordinate that is say?Ra 1h 59m 59s,?Dec 32d 35m 13s, everything is fine and Gemini controller reports the position on the controller interface and shows the target in Cartes de Ceil after the slew.
?
If I then slew a faction amount to?Ra 2h 00m 00s, Dec 32d 35m 13s Gemini suddenly reports the Ra as 15h 00m 00s and the target in Cartes de Ceil appears in the southern hemisphere. There is a sudden jump in position reporting, but the scope does remaining pointing at the correct position in the sky.
?
But if a slew was initiated as for a meridian flip, the scope would end up pointing into the ground. I do not know if this is a problem with the driver, Gemini or my Cartes de Ceil settings.

Peter


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 

I realize the Ra is changing with the the earths rotation. I noticed a jump in the Az value also at thi stransition point? ?(Dec 15h: Az 353 degrees) to (Dec 2h Az 227 degrees) Az summing to 680 degrees.


Re: Meridian Flips and NINA

 
Edited

Paul,

I've found a boundary condition were my meridian flip fails. The scope stays on the west side and ends up pointing at the ground. Any thoughts by folks in the group would be appreciated. I do not know if this is a settings problem or a bug someplace??
?
If I slew to a coordinate that is say?Ra 1h 59m 59s,?Dec 32d 35m 13s, everything is fine and Gemini controller reports the position on the controller interface and shows the target in Cartes de Ceil after the slew.
?
If I then slew a faction amount to?Ra 2h 00m 00s, Dec 32d 35m 13s Gemini suddenly reports the Ra as 15h 00m 00s and the target in Cartes de Ceil appears in the southern hemisphere. There is a sudden jump in position reporting, but the scope does remaining pointing at the correct position in the sky.
?
But if a slew was initiated as for a meridian flip, the scope would end up pointing into the ground. I do not know if this is a problem with the driver, Gemini or my Cartes de Ceil settings.

Peter


Re: New G11G with subpar guiding

 

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 02:29 AM, Vishal Billa wrote:
I've finally gotten around to testing the performance of my G11G and everything wenty great except for some pretty erratic behavior in the RA axis diring guiding. I used all default settings, except for the recommended changes from the guiding assistant, and was able to get around .8" error in the DEC axis but almost 3" error in the RA axis. I'll attach links to the guide/debug log but I'm not sure what to look for when reading them; I was hoping someone here could comment on whether this looks like an issue to be solved in PHD2 settings/PEC training or if this is something going on in the mechanics of the mount.
Vishel,

It would help if you could post a few pictures of your mount (Dec and Ra worm drives. I ran an FFT on the raw data and you do have some nasty issues. There is a lot in this form on the 76s error related to the bearings, but you have a 14 arc-sec peak-to-peak 120s error. I do not know where this come from, or the large 60s error.?

Peter


Re: On why the clutch knob matters to worm mesh to the ring gear...

 

A few points I'd like to add:

I think everybody should check the relative position of the worm with respect to the center of the ring gear as the starting point when looking at Dec backlash. This is true of new mount owners and certainly used mounts. We are talking about an error of just a few thou or less can cause serious issues with regard to backlash. If the worm is not ridding dead center the force needed to rotate the worm increases a lot effecting backlash and the general well being of the worm in terms of longevity. So how the take stock of the situation:

1. While the clutch is tight, remove the cover to the worm keeping it locked in place and using feeler gage establish to reference when the stack of feeler gage just starts to have a little resistance sliding under the smooth 1/2" section of the worm.

2. Remove the entire worm assemble keeping the bearing block in place, and rotating them out of the way press the worm into the ring gear with your thumb.

3. Now using the same stack of feeler gages, slide it under the same point in the worm. The resistance you felt before sliding it under the same point on the worm ought to be the same. If you can not get the gages under the worm the ring gear is too close to the base plate. You should change the top thrust bearing. The one that Michael and I used was sourced from McMaster and cost I think about $13. Its seems to be a high quality component. I would not get one from Losmandy. When I did this the high ring gear turning resistance I had before with the clutch tightened went away.??

4. If the stack of gages slide under the worm easily then the worm itself is too low. You will the have to shim under the bearing blocks. I had a set of original blocks the were black but silver underneath. The new blocks from Losmandy are differently dimensioned.? You might try a new set, else if that is what you already have, you will have to shim the bearing blocks. You can use the feeler gage to determine the thickness of the shim material. Or take one of the feelers and use that.

Peter?


Re: New mount guiding calibration

 

Hi Bill,

I'd get as close as I can to that intersection point.? The question is ...where is it best?

If you think about possible errors in polar alignment effects: when you are on the meridian, only errors in AZ affect the star tracking.? That's why you only adjust AZ in a drift alignment procedure when you are on the meridian.? So that suggests you should stay close to the Meridian line, and just be (as you said about 20 deg) off in DEC off the equator.?

Anyways...some thoughts for you ...

Michael



On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 2:53 PM Bill Grogan <bgrogan267@...> wrote:
I received a new G11G about 3 weeks ago.? I¡¯ve only had a few clear nights since receiving it so I haven¡¯t done any guide calibration yet, I¡¯ve just used it as it came and it¡¯s done pretty good stock.? Tonight I have a clear night shaping up and want to go ahead and do the calibration and baseline.? I intend on using the method Brian V has posted several times, but I have a problem.? I can¡¯t see the intersection of the meridian and celestial equator.? So, I was wondering if I could be off of that a bit and still get an acceptable baseline and calibration?? I have several ¡®windows¡¯ of sky I can use that are in that direction but not where it should be.? Those closest window I have is about 45min past the meridian at about +5 dec. ?the closest window I have before the meridian is about an hour and a half before the meridian at zero dec.? I can get right on the meridian if I go +20 dec. Are any of these acceptable or should I just continue using it stock until I can get my rig into a clear view of where I should be?


Re: New mount guiding calibration

 

Hi Bill

That should be fine - i would try to get close to DEC 0 as long as you aren't low in the sky

the recommendation is generally two parts:

1. aiming close to that intersection is where star movement is the greatest, so you will get more accurate calibrations, If you are in that area, you should be fine

2. it also avoids areas of calibration that often cause issues: calibration close to the horizon?or calibrating near the poles






On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:53 PM Bill Grogan <bgrogan267@...> wrote:
I received a new G11G about 3 weeks ago.? I¡¯ve only had a few clear nights since receiving it so I haven¡¯t done any guide calibration yet, I¡¯ve just used it as it came and it¡¯s done pretty good stock.? Tonight I have a clear night shaping up and want to go ahead and do the calibration and baseline.? I intend on using the method Brian V has posted several times, but I have a problem.? I can¡¯t see the intersection of the meridian and celestial equator.? So, I was wondering if I could be off of that a bit and still get an acceptable baseline and calibration?? I have several ¡®windows¡¯ of sky I can use that are in that direction but not where it should be.? Those closest window I have is about 45min past the meridian at about +5 dec. ?the closest window I have before the meridian is about an hour and a half before the meridian at zero dec.? I can get right on the meridian if I go +20 dec. Are any of these acceptable or should I just continue using it stock until I can get my rig into a clear view of where I should be?



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


New mount guiding calibration

 

I received a new G11G about 3 weeks ago. ?I¡¯ve only had a few clear nights since receiving it so I haven¡¯t done any guide calibration yet, I¡¯ve just used it as it came and it¡¯s done pretty good stock. ?Tonight I have a clear night shaping up and want to go ahead and do the calibration and baseline. ?I intend on using the method Brian V has posted several times, but I have a problem. ?I can¡¯t see the intersection of the meridian and celestial equator. ?So, I was wondering if I could be off of that a bit and still get an acceptable baseline and calibration? ?I have several ¡®windows¡¯ of sky I can use that are in that direction but not where it should be. ?Those closest window I have is about 45min past the meridian at about +5 dec. ?the closest window I have before the meridian is about an hour and a half before the meridian at zero dec. ?I can get right on the meridian if I go +20 dec. Are any of these acceptable or should I just continue using it stock until I can get my rig into a clear view of where I should be?


Re: On why the clutch knob matters to worm mesh to the ring gear...

Keith
 

The method Peter used is exactly what I did, and also observed the ring gear being high relative to the worm.? Unless the needle bearing needs to be replaced for other reasons, a much cheaper/easier way to raise the ring gear is to cut a shim out of whatever you have (brass/aluminum) to place under the bottom washer.? This is what I did.? Did it make any noticeable difference?? None that I could tell.

Also re: greasing the centre cylinder (or inner bore of the ring gear, same thing), I asked Scott about this once, and I quote: "... you can grease".

Keith


On why the clutch knob matters to worm mesh to the ring gear...

 

Hi all,

There is a lot to talk about here, to resolve several "impossible" puzzles, so please bear with me.??

The unsolved puzzles are:
1. Many people note that their worm gear spacing is very sensitive to the clutch knob force at the other end of the driven 1.25 inch shaft.? What could cause this to occur??

2. The ring gear can sometimes pinch at a particular rotation angle.? This is not affected by the cylindrical needle bearings.? Why does the ring gear pinch?

3. It is assumed that the worm gear a is and the ring gear are at the same perfect level.? Is this assumption a good one or...should you check it?

Let me tell you what's going on in these two issues, and what to look for....and some potential solutions.??

_____

My GM8 DEC axis has a ring gear that rotates around the axis center.? The thick aluminum ring gear is supported underneath by a 3-part needle bearing:. the thick bottom race, the flat thrust needle bearing, and the upper thin race. (In a G11 the thinner race would be at the bottom).? Above the ring gear is a flat surface that contacts the clutch disk.??

The key is that: the ring gear center does not ride on a cylindrical needle bearing!? It rotates on the outer surface of a black tube (not magnetic so I guess anodized aluminium).? That center of the aluminum ring gear will need lubricant to reduce friction there.? See the photo 2nd from bottom.??

That ring gear teeth center height comes from the thrust bearing and it's races below the ring gear.? The heights of the worm center and ring gear center are critical....they must be the same level for the worm threads to be at the finest threads of the ring gear teeth.??

As the worm rotates, friction with the ring gear will either tend to push the ring gear down towards the thrust bearing, or upward. Diwnward should be ok...the thrust bearing is solid.??

But if the worm rotates the other direction, the ring gear will be pushed upward off the thrust bearing. Then the ring gear gets "thicker" and can jam.??

The only thing holding the ring gear down is the weight of the scope (if you were at CWD for instance), or the force of the clutch knob if your axis were horizontal.? Worst case would be with counterweights upward and the weight of the scope pulling downward on the clutch pad.? Then there could be a gap allowing the ring gear to get pushed away from the thrust bearing by the worm friction.??

The friction between the worm and ring gear is critical.? If the metal contact point were frictionless, nothing will happen.? But if there is friction...look what happens.? As the worm pushes the ring gear upward, the ring gear teeth curve outward toward the worm, tightening the grip...tightening the friction.? And this will jam the worm.??

This won't happen if the ring gear center? were slightly above the worm center.? Then as the ring gear got moved upward, the worm would loosen it's grip.? But the other direction of worm rotation would then go tight. That's why the ring gear must be centered on the worm gear , and the ring gear must not be allowed to move up or down...so the clutch knob must be tight enough to hold this.?

So:? puzzle #1:
Your clutch force is important to assure constant worm to ring gear spacing. The ring gear must not be allowed to get pushed upward by friction from the rotating worm gear.? ?That clutch force is the main thing that keeps the ring gear from getting pushed up or down with respect to the worm.? ?Counterweights up is the worst position for this issue

Your work to ring gear lube is important. You want the lowest frictional force between these metal contact points.? I am now using CRC Brake and Caliper grease for this worm to ring gear interface.??

You would want there to be lubricant between the ring gear and the metal cylinder it rides on.? That's usually a brass cylinder in G11 and is a black anodized aluminum on my GM8. I have not lubed that area before.? On the GM8 you must remove the thick ring gear to get to that surface.?

The cylindrical needle bearings hold the 1.25 inch steel shafts, but they don't hold the axis of the ring gear. The ring gear is a separate component from the 1.25 inch axis.? Those needle bearing must rotate freely.? They can get gummed up.? When you take out the 1.25 inch shaft you can feel these needles for rotational freedom.??

This also explains why the ring gear can pinch against the worm at a particular rotation angle.? If the ring gear teeth were cut and the ring gear center was off, the ring gear would be "wider" at one point. I thought this is very unlikely, if the ring gear center would be cut first then the teeth cut.? I thought it more likely that there is a slight imperfection in the center cylinder on which the ring gear rides.? If the problem is with that center cylinder, then lapping the worm to the ring gear will not improve this.? If the problem is only with the ring gear centering then polishing/lapping the worm to ring gear would help reduce the high spots.

Peter found a gap between his 1.25 inch needle bearings and his 1.25 inch steel shaft but I found no issue there.? Peter found it easy to add or remove needle bearings in his G11, but on my GM8 I find no way to easily remove or replace the cylindrical? needle bearings.? The top of the upper needle bearing is 2 inches below the ring gear surface. See bottom photo looking down this axis.??

I did find my ring gear could be lifted up and down on its center cylinder, even with the worm in place .? It would move about 1mm or so vertically.? I then replaced the upper thrust needle bearing, as Peter did, with a new one (for my GM8 that was a McMaster-Carr INA brand box marked TC2435/0-5-HLA.). That raised my ring gear slightly and the ring gear seems better centered.? It can be lifted slightly...less than 1 mm.? (It would jam is there is no force holding the ring gear down...friction lifted up the ring gear and jams it to the worm gear.)

So I think the assumption that every mounts ring gear and worm gear are at the same height .. now has some counter examples.? I suggest that you check it.

Here is how Peter determined his corre t worm level:
?Peter removed his worm drive and removed his worm.? He then pressed the worm into the ring gear center...so the sharp edges of the worm are at the sharp center threads if the ring gear.? He then used feeler gauges to measure the height of the thick round part of the worm...there the threads end...to the base where the worm blocks mount.? He found his worm center slightly too high (he measured 0.001 inch too high for the worm).? He solved his issue by buying a new thrust bearing and that new one was slightly thicker than the original...raised up his ring gear and got a closer mesh to his worm.

If your worm is not high enough, then as Mark Crossley reported, you can shim under the worm block to get a better mesh.?

Here are some photos...

Best,
Michael




Re: New G11G with subpar guiding

 

>> ?Is the oldham coupler something that I should wait until after the baseline guiding to adjust?

I recommend doing the baseline first, so we can better see the raw mount performance.?

Yes that is a newer mount, but I don't know what adjustments if any the seller may have attempted. From your support ticket there was already that one modification that was very unusual.


Brian


On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:49 PM Vishal Billa <vishal.n.billa@...> wrote:
Brian,

I was able to confirm with the seller that the mount was brand new and unused and if im correct in that the first two digits of the serial number (219554) signify the year of manufacture, then it's definitely a newer mount with the most recent hardware. Tonight looks clear so I will run through the baseline guiding sequence and see what I get. Is the oldham coupler something that I should wait until after the baseline guiding to adjust?

Thanks,
Vishal



--
Brian?



Brian Valente
portfolio


Re: Need advice selling my Losmandy G11 492 Digital Drive

 

Jeff,

I just spoke with Michael Herman, as I was not so familiar with style of G11. I am defiantly interested.. Think yahoo and you have my email address.?

Peter?


Re: New G11G with subpar guiding

 

Brian,

I was able to confirm with the seller that the mount was brand new and unused and if im correct in that the first two digits of the serial number (219554) signify the year of manufacture, then it's definitely a newer mount with the most recent hardware. Tonight looks clear so I will run through the baseline guiding sequence and see what I get. Is the oldham coupler something that I should wait until after the baseline guiding to adjust?

Thanks,
Vishal