Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Losmandy_users
- Messages
Search
Re: Pointing issues
typo: "" is wrong... is correct...sorry for that! Michael? On Nov 12, 2017 7:36 AM, "Michael Herman" <mherman346@...> wrote:
|
Re: Pointing issues
Hi Doc, I find it valuable to do these steps if my pointing goes haywire.?? I am using a Gemini 1, not a Gemini 2.? They differ in hardware, but I'm not aware of any difference between the two in software algorithms.?? So try these steps to diagnose what's going on. (I use Gemini.net to more easily get to internal pointing model values.? You get that and basic ASCOM software from the ASCOM website.) 1. Using the Gemink.net Advanced window, download the internal parameters ("Read from Gemini".) Write down the existing pointing model parameter values.? I think there are about 9 of these, and they are explained in the Gemini manual.? ?Later, you will? compare the values to those of a good model.?? 2. Store the existing pointing model in a file, and name that file "Nov 12 2017 bad pointing" or something like that.?? 3. In Gemini.net, on the Advanced window,? uncheck the tick box "Synch performs additional Align ". Also inchecjk the box "PC sends to Gemini on connect" to make sure your PC, that may have bad values in its default file, does not send those to the handset. 4. Exit Gemini.net (software disconnect the Gemini from the PC...the cable can still be there.) 5. From the handset, perform a Cold Boot.? This sets all internal model values to zero. 6. Reconnect Gemini to the PC.? Use Gemini.net to Read the Mount values.? Ensure they are all zero still.? Also look at the Latitude, Longitude, Elevation, UTC date and time.? (There is a tickbox for having Gemini.net send the correct PC known date and time to the Gemini when it connects.? I do use that. )? 7. Start a sky chart on the PC that links to Gemini.net.? For that, I use both Stellarium-scope? (from Dragon-Welch computing website I think is ) and the sky chart itself Stellarium from? Stellarium.org.? ?You run Stellarium first to set its location to your site, then Save configuration, then exit.? Second, start Stellarium-scope, then select mount Gemini.net, then start Stellarium (a button on Stellarium-scope can do that).? Your Stellarium should show "scope" pointed at Polaris, if you are in positive latitude.? (You can minimize the Stellarium-scope window...just don't kill the program as it nicely links Stellarium and the Gemini.net together.? ) 8. From the handset,? use Align Telescope to go to a bright star in its list.? Sometimes, this initial point is accurate, and sometimes, for unknown reason, it will be way off.?? (I never know if this is due to old Daylight savings time change dates internal to the Gemini1 code, or why this happens... but it does even for a cold boot.? It's the weirdest thing because the mount correctly knows CWD...and time and location...how can it be so far far off in 1st star point?! ) 9. When you have centered your first Alignment star, complete handset alignment pressing the buttons that requires.? 10. Look at the Model parameters using Gemini.net.? ?They will all still be zero.? What changed?? The settings for RA and DEC offset encoder counts.?? 11. Look at the skychart.? It should show the "scope" right atop the star you aligned to. 12. Back to Gemini.net, advanced page.? Now check the tick box for "Synch performs additional Align".? That allows the Sky chart software to not only Synch the existing (all zero) model, but allows Gemini to calculate new parameter values.? ? 13. Back to the Sky chart.? Use your mouse to select a new star... (important!:) on the same side of the meridian as the first star.? (Press the spacebar to center and track that star on Stellarium.? ?) That means keep the 2nd ( and 3rd ) stars East of the meridian if the 1st star was East.? Or stars 2 and 3 must be West if the first star was West.? Use the (Control-1 in Stellarium) issue a goto from the sky chart to move the scope, then center the star on your scope with your handset.? Then on the sky chart do a Synch (Control-3 from Stellarium). Do that again for a 3rd star also same side of meridian as 1st star. 11. Now use Gemini.net "advanced" page,? Read from Gemini, and look at the model pointing parameters again.? You should see a few non-zero values.? You can save that data in a file with some name..."Model with 3 stars Nov 12 2017" etc. 12. Now use the sky chart to pick 3 stars on the opposite side of meridian.? Synch (and "Synch performs additional Align" is checked in Gemini.net) and Align to those from the sky chart.? ?Download and look at the parameter list and see more values change.?? 14. At this point,? I stop and save the model as full model for the? date.? ?Your system should accurately point to new objects around the sky.? I also Un-check the box "Synch performs additional Align " because I don't want added star's data to somehow mess up the calculations (which are a black- box to me).?? 15.? Now examine the model values.? ?How do your original "bad" model values compare? Let us know what you find....? I hope all these steps get you to a good and repeatable solution, and more enjoyment of your system. - Michael Herman? On Nov 11, 2017 6:11 PM, "lfbqtuqvokrxwkk24m2de6zj23io2kfpm5qcqt2w@... [Losmandy_users]" <Losmandy_users@...> wrote:
|
Pointing issues
Have had my G11 for about 2 years and have had pointing problems since about first 8 months in. Have had paddle and control box rehabbed twice and now both are undergoing a full reworking. I'm sure Losmandy will rehab my units appropriately but my questions are not about the fixes. I would like advice from the group on what to look for in pointing problems and what might go into correcting them. I understand it's a complex system but is there a check list of possible problems that I can look to addressing if my system encounters further issues. I have researched the web as much as I can and read the info on the Gemini 2 site but would like some guidance from the members on this as I have this feeling I'm not doing all I can to correct the problems. I have a TAK130 sitting on the G11 mount and tripod and all are in excellent operating order. Thanks, Doc |
Re: GM8 weight limits
Hi Greg,
Brrrr, I'm a southern California native, when it dips into the upper 50's we think it's going to snow LOL.? I normally don;t use the GM8 with any payloads over 30 lbs but I have had an old ribbed back orange tube C14 in the saddle and it worked fine. The old USA cast ribbed back C14s had to be 45_ lbs. ? Chip ? ?? |
Re: GM8 weight limits
Thanks, Chip.
That is an interesting concept... I suspect the rotational torque on the motors is the real issue, as well as how the motors drive the load. And static load, to start a suspended load moving, is always larger than the force needed to keep it going. Sadly, overloading a mount is depressingly obvious... one tends to find out much too late, however. In the absence of engineering data, marketing specs are such a curse... I had noticed that over time the numbers on the GM8 page had been creeping up. Had a faint hope that the driver was a tad more analytical. But thats ok... My GM8+Gemini2+recent steppers is working fine, now that I have sorted out some of the learning curve issues. Behaved much better when I ignored the 500ma spec and put in a 3amp power supply. Wished the levels that I see are built into the G11 had been done on the GM8 as well. At least the saddle... I have the parts to put that bracket on that I was asking about. But we have high winds and record cold... so I am going to stay in tonight... Regards, greg |
Re: GM8 weight limits
Greg,
I think this change was made because the lower end mounts are all rated with fictitious payloads and Losmandy conservatively rated their mounts much as AP and Bisque have always done. I have a standard GM8 with a Gemini 1 with 1st gen servomotors and it happily carries a 30+ lb. payload without any issues. For later GM8 mounts with Gemini 2-minis and the latest high torque motors this seems to be a more realistic payload rating though I would think for imaging the original 30lb. payload limit would net better results at longer focal lengths with a big refractor loaded in the saddle.?? Chip? |
Re: GM8 DEC axis head... depth of blind holes for attaching saddle...
Hi Bill,
My bad! The topic read GM8 and my brain left off the '11' in the body text. Yes, the GM811 will not have the same mechanical interference issues as a standard servomotor GM8 and the clearances will be almost the same as the full boat G11G which the Rayox works great with. I have a GM8 and G11. Scott rebuilt my G11 several months ago into a fully optioned G11G and I have also played with several different Rayox prototypes as they were developed over the last year into the extremely nice final production version saddle. Anyway, as I recall most fasteners in this class are good to go as long as you engage at least as many threads deep as the major diameter of the fastener so I think you should be okay to grind or file 20-30 thousandths off the end or just buy a shorter fastener. But if you are worried about maximum strength hand fit the screw to keep as many threads as possible but I would not worry about it too much as even a single standard quality Grade-5 1/4-20 fastener has a pretty high strength in shear which is how they are loaded in this application.? Chip ? .? ? ?? |
GM8 weight limits
I noticed today that the product page for the GM8 now shows 30 to 40 pounds (??) based on the OTA configuration. Is there some information about what the variables are?? I would guess, but might be wrong, that a short, heavy RC reflector might be ok but a long refractor not, thinking about the possible rotational torques. Thanks, greg latiak avalon observatory ? |
Re: GM8 DEC axis head... depth of blind holes for attaching saddle...
Still looking if someone can measure the depth of the threaded blind holes used to attached a saddle to the DEC head on any GM8 or GM811.
Stephen Pizzo (good guy to deal with) had sold a number of his saddles to Losmandy owners (yes, there were G11 owners but I believe he was certain there were a number of GM8 owners).? No GM8 owners commented about the threaded fasteners he supplied as being too long.? Maybe they just used shorter fasteners, and didn't say anything, but I thought I'd follow up with other GM8/GM811 owners and see what was the typical. So if someone can post the thread engagement depth of these blind holes, I'd be most appreciative. Thanks... ... Bill |
Re: GM8 DEC axis head... depth of blind holes for attaching saddle...
At 15:56 10-11-17, bill.krosney@... [Losmandy_users] wrote:
I had Scott put on the RA Ext kit. Both for the ability to split the head for transport and packing but also to provide greater clearance.This is a brilliant solution to reducing carrying weight, providing more clearance, and at the same time making it simple to remove/replace the DEC axis. David |
Re: GM8 DEC axis head... depth of blind holes for attaching saddle...
Good comments Chip, My unit is the GM811, so its "GM8" DEC axis?already has the tucked in motors (which I agree are very nice) and the new OPWs. Also I purchased the GM811 and had Scott put on the RA Ext kit.? Both for the ability to split the head for transport and packing but also to provide greater clearance. Once the saddle is mounted first order of business will be to verify what I have for mechanical clearance. Thanks... ... Bill |
Re: G11 clutch spacer question.
See the nice photos of the standard parts, and possible rearrangement of the parts order, at Mark Crossley's valuable website: ? It's on one of his many pages, but the first page has a link titled something like "improvements" ...? Best, Michael? On Nov 10, 2017 3:03 AM, "photon_trap@... [Losmandy_users]" <Losmandy_users@...> wrote:
|
Re: SBIG ST-i
David,
Yes, with PhD, PhD2, or any other program that supports the ST4 interface directly from the guider (your STi has the ST4 itself - it is the modular phono jack right next to the USB cable).? Or if you like you can use an program that supports? ASCOM using a USB-to-ST4 dongle. There are several of the later available like that of ShoeStringAstronomy or ZWO. Some prefer that option because it means there is one less cable going to the OTA (but there is still one going to the mount). But it means you have to load and run ASCOM - which you may or may not already be doing. The ST4 is simpler that way. Regards, Mark C. PS: To be clear - the ST4 interface, while it uses a 6P6C modular phono jack, is NOT a serial link. It is a series of 6 discrete electrical signals (one for each of N, S. E and W, one ground, and optional a power line). Just like the hand pad. If your model oft the drive has a connector marked "HD/CCD" that is the same as the hand pads connection. PPS: You can buy 6P6C (sometimes called RJ12 or RJ11 - 6P6C refers to six position/six connections) splitters so you can have the hand pad and the guider connected at the same time. |
G11 clutch spacer question.
The old G11 Celestron model I recently got may be missing some parts. Both clutch assemblies have the following: knob - spring washer - thin washer - thrust bearing...and that's all. Isn't there supposed to be a spacer and another thin washer? Haven't tried a load on the mount yet. I am just in the process of disassembly for cleaning. |
Re: SBIG ST-i
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYes. ?I have used the sti on my CG11 using ccdops and ccdsoft software. ?Works great ??..Joe Sent from my iDork On Nov 9, 2017, at 8:06 PM, puzzlewuzzle.dr@... [Losmandy_users] <Losmandy_users@...> wrote:
|