¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Jimmy Bruno Midnight Blue Guild eBay Auction

 

I'm amazed that this message got by the moderator - a blatant
advertisement. Perhaps I am wrong, but I assumed that part of the
role of the moderator is to filter out spam and commercial messages.

That said, this is one of the reasons that I don't like Jimmy Bruno --
how can you take a title - "Midnight Blue" which is one of the all
time jazz guitar classics by Kenny Burrell, and blatantly reuse the
name? (Are album titles copyrighted?) I think this is incredibly
disrespectful. If you listen to his first album, you'll also hear a
song that he claimed to write as bearing a very strong resemblance to
Blusette.

I guess I'm really surprised at Concord Records as well who are
probably going to rush to sign up Kenny G., Eminem, and Britney
Spears. I've heard it said that his record company, among others,
pushes the "smoking" image and discourages him from playing ballads,
which in my opinion, he is really quite artful.

I like both Bruno and Metheny at various times. I recently heard Pat
speak for a couple hours, and was amazed by his really honest
commitment to music. I agree his sound is kind of muddy to me.

-Jim


--- In jazz_guitar@y..., concord_records2001@y... wrote:
To celebrate the release of Jimmy Bruno's smokin' new Concord
release
Midnight Blue on August 14th you can bid to win a private lesson
with
Jimmy in his hometown of Brotherly Love- Philadelphia!
The Winning Bidder will also receive one guitar courtesy of Fender
Guild: The Guild StarFire 2, thin line archtop, retail value
$1999.99
and one Seymour Duncan pickup! The winner may choose from either
their Seymour Duncan, Antiquity or Benedetto product lines.

20


Re: Mick Goodricks Advancing Guitarist

Jesper Barrit
 

Hey ES175guy !!

Try amazon.com ...

Go here - ...

GREAT book, btw =)

/Jesper
From: v.ingle@...
To: jazz_guitar@...
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 12:30 AM
Subject: [jazz_guitar] Mick Goodricks Advancing Guitarist


I would like a copy of Mick's book to with my learning process,
I can't find one anywhere. Not here in the city I live in, on
the web nada'. If anyone out there can help me, I'd greatly
appreciate it, Thanks.
ES175guy


Innovation

Mark Stanley
 

As you can tell, I have a little too much time on my hands to
think about this, but so be it.

Player's are remembered for being unique.
We still talk about Monk because he was a great composer
and didnt sound like anyone.
Pat Metheny does not sound like any other guitar player and
his knack for composition is remarkable (not to mention everything
else he does on guitar).

Someone here wrote that his solo on "Blues for Pat" on
the Joshua Redman album Wish was not as innovative as Vinnie
Barbarino or someone. Try listening to "We
Had A Sister" on the same recording and try to come up with any current
guitarist with that depth of composition and beauty.
You wont, because most guitarists, especially jazz ones, cant write
worth a wooden pickle. They are all concerned about "chops" and by the
way, people who seem to use that word never have any.
I did a recording session w/ Phillip Glass where one of the
string players told me that not many of the local classical
musicians would work w/ Glass because he wasnt enough like
blah blah blah. That's what I hear a lot of you saying here.
Mr. X is not blah blah blah... I had a very long conversation
with Dennis Chambers about this phenomenon today. The bottom line:
Let X=X.

P.S. you can tell the leader by the # of arrows in his ass.

-Mark


New to the list

 

Just thought i'd say hi and let everyone know who i am before i start
shooting my mouth off on stuff i know nothing about. :}

I'm dave, and live the suburbs of St Paul, MN. My playing goes through
different phases of interest, where i pick up some body of technique or
pursue some theory or sound in my head. And currently, i'm back on a jazz
kick. I'm not much for chops, but i'm pretty good at sounding like
myself!

My physical technique is changing in interesting ways right now... for
years, i have played acoustic mostly fingerstyle and electric almost
exclusively with a pick. Now suddenly, i'm playing electric with bare
fingers, and acoustic with a pick (and playing simpler, folky stuff on
acoustic, but that's another story). The fingers thing is nice. I'm
working on playing solo lines with my bare thumb (and Wes Montgomery style
octaves, but it will be a long time before i feel i do that well), and
picking out more precise chord voicings with bare fingers. I'm also able
to apply the highly personalized finger-strumming i do on acoustic to
jazzier chords, although it's harder when i have more to mute.

A good chunk of my sense of jazz comes from what i listen to at the
time... these days, i'm listening to a lot of electric Miles Davis -
Tribute to Jack Johnson, Agharta, Bitches Brew, etc. I'm also really into
"Yo Miles!", a tribute album to this period by Henry Kaiser and Wadada Leo
Smith. In a slightly mellower vein, i've been jamming along with Mingus.
Basically, my ears are drawn to a different place than the mainstream jazz
guitar traditions. I don't listen much to either traditionalists or
fusion players. The jazz guitarists i like tend to be people like Marc
Ribot, Bill Frisell, Steve Tibbetts, David Torn, Sonny Sharrock, etc...
people who push hard for a unique tone as much as a personal sense of
melody and harmony.

Here's a practical question for the group to chew on... i recently got a
new axe, a Gibson Blueshawk. I like it a lot, but it definitely needs new
pickups. The stock set is a pair of "Blues 90" pickups which are the same
size as a P90 soapbar, but not the same construction. I'm thinking of
replacing them with either Fralins or Rio Grandes. Anyone have experience
with either brand and want to say yea or nay? I'm trying to get a tone
that's capable of a nasty edge when i turn it up, but can also speak
clearly on complex chord voicings, and i love the sound of the classic
P90, especially on semi-hollow and hollow guitars. Any other suggestions?

As you may have noticed, once i get going i tend to keep going. :}

-dave


Bruno, Metheney and the Range of Innovation

 

Jazzers: appreciating Bruno and Metheney both is easy.
I listened to _Bright Size Life_ a million times and
Metheney was my fave at the time. I was into the same
sorts of sounds. He has a significant body of work
that puts him in the "pantheon" of greats. No doubt.

Bruno is part of the bebop guitar resurgence. Part of
it is simply how fun it is, and how fun it can sound.
Listeners recognize the expression of freedom and go
along for the ride. Bebop also tends to ruin you for
non-bebop. It does seem as if one should at least "go
through" bebop to wherever you are going. It is the
best way to learn harmony, and harmony (changes, as
some have referrred to them--and not a bad way of
thinking of it) is the key to understanding music. The
downside is that it can get academic, where theory
counts more than the sound. But that is just bad
bebop.

To see the appeal of Bruno, check out _Burnin_. It
isn't just the chops; it is exciting music. Recently
Bruno is experimenting more, as with _Polarity_ with
Joe Beck. He will have a body of work at some point as
well.

Jazz guitar is going through an "historical" period in
which it doesn't matter what era one picks. Acordingly
the same goes for styles. Most guitarists play from
more than one period or style. What is even better is
that we now have so many good players that together
they pretty much cover the spectrum of what one can
think to do.

As I write this, I am listening to John Pizzarelli's
trio cd, _Kisses in the Rain_. He can cook with that
rhythm that he got from his dad. He can fly with the
single note stuff too. Now his stuff isn't ready to be
the sound track for the next Star Trek, it is
definetly "placed" in time and style. But that's cool,
He is further exploring an unexhausted style/era.

Randy Groves

=====
J. Randall Groves, Ph.D. ("Rando")
Professor of Humanities
Ferris State University
groves@...
bebopguitar@...


Re: The difference between Jazz & Blues

Deolindo Casimiro
 

From: "Sebastian" <jazz_1971@...>
Reply-To: jazz_guitar@...
To: jazz_guitar@...
Subject: [jazz_guitar] Re: The difference between Jazz & Blues
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 07:08:22 -0000
Jazz was more of an offshoot of blues, but it had a mixture of
different musical influences, ragtime, swing, popular tunes in the 20s
onwards, latin, etc. While jazz may use the I-IV-V progressions, it
is not limited to that. There are rhythm changes such as I-vi-IV-V7
kind of progression. Not to mention the use of colourful chords,
harmonies borrowed from any kind of musical influences. Yes, even
classical music from the classical era (Bach, etc) or Romantic era
(Debussy, Ravel) and modern era (Stravinsky, Schonenberg). Jazz is
still evolving as you can see
I always thought Claude Debussy (and his peers) was a member of the Impressionist School (not the Romantic). In fact, as the story goes, the unpredictability of his harmonies and his habit of extending chords - something the Romantic School would loathe - may have inspired some early bebop luminaries. Anybody agrees?


Re: Mick Goodricks Advancing Guitarist

 

--- In jazz_guitar@y..., v.ingle@a... wrote:
I would like a copy of Mick's book to with my learning process,
I can't find one anywhere. Not here in the city I live in, on
the web nada'. If anyone out there can help me, I'd greatly
appreciate it, Thanks.
ES175guy
Aebersold has the book for $14.95.
www.jajazz.com


Re: Bruno, Metheney and the Range of Innovation

Mark Stanley
 

*
MODERATORS note: This thread is in danger of getting
personal. Everyone is reminded of the guidelines
in the group. Attack the viewpoint, not the person.
*


I believe Pat has played a Gibson 175 for 30 years.
Is that not an archtop? I have a 1954 Gibson 175 and
it appears to be an archtop.
Pat got more from Ornette intervalically than Diorio.
He got a lot from Goodrich too.
[SNIP]
Mark



--- Randy Groves <bebopguitar@...> wrote:

Jazzers: Metheney is fairly innovative (I just don't
like his sound--get an archtop! please!--I will try
the trio cd though), although all that wide-interval
fourths and fifths stuff he gets from Joe Diorio. On
the value of innovation, I like the whole range from
retro stuff of Howard Alden and Frank Vignola to
straight ahead bop/standards of Bruno, Burrell,
Randy
Johnston or Joe Pass to the 1st level of "stretch,"
Diorio, Jim Hall and Metheney to the wilder stuff of
someone like James Emery (anyone heard him? total
guitar god but music first and invention the most
important) or even McGlaughlin in his Shakti
incarnation (the Mahvishnu stuff went out there
too).
How are we to think of this range of material when
it
comes to music appreciation? I think it is a mark of
postmodernism that all this is coexisting in the
marketplace at the same time, and that the same
people
can listen and enjoy all of it. Of course,
postmodern
music will have to mix these in the same work of
art,
but that is another topic.

Randy Groves

=====
J. Randall Groves, Ph.D. ("Rando")
Professor of Humanities
Ferris State University
groves@...
bebopguitar@...


Reminder - The Jim Pellegrino Trio

 

We would like to remind you of this upcoming event.

The Jim Pellegrino Trio

Date: Saturday, August 18, 2001
Time: 8:00PM - 12:00AM EDT (GMT-04:00)

Sat, August 18th, John Carlini will be playing with "The Jim
Pellegrino
Trio" at The Verve. The lineup will be-
Jim Pellegrino - Tenor Sax and Flute
Bob Funesti - Acoustic Bass
John Carlini - Acoustic Guitar

Verve Restaurant
18 E. Main St.
Somerville, NJ
(908)707-8655


Re: Digest Number 394

 

You said of Pat Metheny's music:

Its more for the background to a tv program on the mating of
sperm whales than the music of the the city, blues, drugs...
And then, in the very next sentence, you said:

I'm not putting him down for what he does...
Ha! You kill me!

What makes this hilarious is that Metheny himself recently dumped
all over everybody's favorite easy target, Kenny G., for desecrating
Louis Armstrong by recording a postumous duet with him. Metheny
did, however, present a reasoned and coherent, if spittle-flecked,
argument as to why Mr. G.'s number was such a travesty.

Keep swinging.

cb


Bruno, Metheney and the Range of Innovation

 

Jazzers: Metheney is fairly innovative (I just don't
like his sound--get an archtop! please!--I will try
the trio cd though), although all that wide-interval
fourths and fifths stuff he gets from Joe Diorio. On
the value of innovation, I like the whole range from
retro stuff of Howard Alden and Frank Vignola to
straight ahead bop/standards of Bruno, Burrell, Randy
Johnston or Joe Pass to the 1st level of "stretch,"
Diorio, Jim Hall and Metheney to the wilder stuff of
someone like James Emery (anyone heard him? total
guitar god but music first and invention the most
important) or even McGlaughlin in his Shakti
incarnation (the Mahvishnu stuff went out there too).
How are we to think of this range of material when it
comes to music appreciation? I think it is a mark of
postmodernism that all this is coexisting in the
marketplace at the same time, and that the same people
can listen and enjoy all of it. Of course, postmodern
music will have to mix these in the same work of art,
but that is another topic.

Randy Groves

=====
J. Randall Groves, Ph.D. ("Rando")
Professor of Humanities
Ferris State University
groves@...
bebopguitar@...


Re: Jimmy Bruno and Downbeat

Mark Stanley
 

I guess I have more to add to my former post about this
topic. Saying "Metheny plays jazz?", is just a vicious thing
to say. Jimmy Bruno probably said that because he is angry,
wears ugly green golf pants and has the name of a pizza
delivery boy. You listen to "Lonley Woman" on Rejoicing and
tell me that is not a pure jazz improvising genius on
guitar. The Travels album alone is enough to put Pat on my
list of most useful and brilliant JAZZ musicians of all time
(Jazz being a thing that evolves).

I originally got involved w/ this thread trying to defend
Jimmy Bruno from a lot of the negative comments people made
about him, but know he just sounds like a jerk. I have to
say that what people who like Bruno keep saying is the word
"chops". That word has almost zero meaning to me about being
a good musician. You want chops, go listen to Frank Gambale
who (I really dont like lowering myself to this level) plays
a bunch of soul-less, technique derived garbage for L.A.
dorks w/ M.I.T. t-shirts on.

He's on my list of people who I can do w/ out, along
w/
Richard Proctor
Frank Gambale
Steve Vai
C.C. Deville
Mick Mars

many more, but what's the point?
Mark





--- jimlil00@... wrote:

The only comment I have seen about Metheney from
Bruno was in a
response to a question regarding current players and
when Metheny's
name was mentioned Bruno said something like "
Metheney plays jazz?"

Mark I find your remarks hard to swallow. Modern
jazz (bop
originated) is a wonderful art form. Metheney may be
a brilliant
musician and an inovator but his music puts me to
sleep. Its more for
the background to a tv program on the mating of
sperm whales than the
music of the the city, blues, drugs, slavery,
poverty, and
prohibition
that is echoed in swing/bop. I'm not putting him
down for what he
does, I just do not like what he does.
Since you seem to have made your mind up on Bruno, I
offer you a
challenge for the two guitatists on the same
grounds.
List to Metheney's solo on "Blues For Pat" on Joshua
Redman's album
and then listen to Jimmy's solo on "Au Privave" off
the Live at
Birdland cd. In the same tune form, you tell me who
is more
innovative
and imaginative.
Let your ears decide.


--- In jazz_guitar@y..., Mark Stanley
<bucketfullopuke@y...> wrote:
Welcome to the group. I think it's a good place
for all of
us to express our opinions.

You might want to check out the thread about Bruno
and see
what I think about hardcore jazzer's who seem
really close
minded and elitist. It is just my opinion, but I
think it
really stinks.

Whether you like Metheny or not, he is the player
of his
day, like Wes was to his and Charlie Christian to
his, and
so on. I happen to think Metheny is a complete
freakin'
genius, from his tone to his compositions to his
improvising. He is incredibly prolific, dedicated
and true
to his art.. I know what you mean about certain
player's
tone's. I cant really get with Mike Stern's tone,
but I like
his playing. I am pretty much against any
processed guitar
sound, which I know Metheny uses exclusively now
w/ the
digitech 2120 Artist rig (and I can hear the
difference in a
bad way).

Whatever Bruno said about Pat is probably
something that I
will find very arrogant and close minded ("but I
will fight
to the death for his right to say it" -Voltaire),
as is the
case with most "old school" bebopers, whose lines
you can
hear a mile away.

That being said, I'd still like to know what Bruno
said. I'd
also like to hear him make 30 years of "original"
music that
is cutting edge (most of it) and will stand the
test of time
like Pat has. If he's like most of these guys
living in the
bebop past, he probably writes a bunch of what I
would call
POOP. (salt peanuts, salt peanuts) We've evolved
here, ya
know. I guess one man's God can be another man's
clown,
that's cool. -Mark

PS- "Pat Metheny, I mean he can play, but..." you
might want
to back that up with a link to your own
playing...-Devil's
Advocate


--- "J. Randall (Randy) Groves"
<bebopguitar@y...> wrote:
Hello Jazzers: I'm new to the group, and I am
interested in the Bruno
thread. I am a big fan of Bruno. He and Robert
Conti
seem to be the
chops gods at the moment. Metheney? Did anyone
ever
post what Bruno
said? My view: Metheney can play, but I can't
stand
that digital
delay sound. It is so mushy! Every once in a
while I
try to listen to
him, but give up after a few minutes. I last
bought
the
Metheny/Scofield thing: nebulous jamming and
terrible tone on both
guitars. I prefer an acoustic archtop sound
(although Bruno has been
doing a lot on a solid body Benedetto--the
"Benny'
lately). My two
cents.

Randy Groves


Mick Goodricks Advancing Guitarist

 

I would like a copy of Mick's book to with my learning process,
I can't find one anywhere. Not here in the city I live in, on
the web nada'. If anyone out there can help me, I'd greatly
appreciate it, Thanks.
ES175guy


Re: The difference between Jazz & Blues

 

Thank you for the clarification. I completely agree. In any
case, to keep things simple, just listen to Charlie Parker
(jazz) and B.B. King (blues)! You can go forward and
backwards in history from there and figure it out...




Most musicians will tell you they are the same. (However, the
difference between blues and gospel is that gospel is about God
and
blues is about women (or the lack thereof).
Nope. Bluesers ALWAYS gots wimin, or one, at least. It's
simply a matter of who is abusing whom or the priveleges
thereof, or who ain' woikin', or she lef' fer anudder man,
or he got caught cheatin', or two of 'em got their notes on
ya together an' EEYOWY, "it" hoits so bad; BUT, the bottom
line is; NO MONEY, HONEY! ;)



But the 'record store' definition would be (in general):

Blues: basically 3 chord tunes with solos on a minor pentatonic
scale. Blues club = Really drunk, loud, rowdy, fun, crowd
(think 'party')
I dunno, take some of the turnarounds that Ted Greene or
Lenny Breau came up with and... Well, maybe that makes 'em
jazz, but then the solos, well, except for those
turnarounds, but then... Also, I've been in blues joints in
Chicago where you'd swear everyone was on Thorazine, well
coulda been 'Ludes, tho... ;)


(Early blues: imagine some guy in the deep south with a guitar
singing a tune that starts with "I woke up in the morning and my
woman was gone..." (melody in 2 notes: the minor third and
tonic))
that's blues.
Nah... It's no shoes, or durty or no socks, hole inna
pocket, no money, feelin' low down, an' usin' a B string for
a low E an' two others jis' missin'... But da wimins is
flockin' all aroun' to feed me dem chittlins con carne...
BTDT. :)



Jazz: complex chord changes with solos that non-Jazz people can't
follow. Jazz club = Really quiet, serious, crowd...
(think 'museum',
or art gallery)
One of the worst fights I ever saw was at a "serious" venue,
between two guys in three piece suits... The cops broke one
guy's arm before he'd stopped swinging. Sh*t happens. And,
morons are everywhere.


(Early Jazz: think of dixieland jazz (not necessarily the
earliest
but...)

Having said that, music is all just hearing it. If you have
doubts
about the difference between jazz and blues, just go to amazon.com
and listen to B.B. King, Muddy Waters, Buddy Guy etc... That's
BLUES. Listen to Charlie Parker, John Coltrane, Miles Davis
etc...
That's Jazz. (but be careful with this categorization because
jazz
guys 'play the blues', but blues guys usually don't 'play the
jazz')

If they all sound the same to you, good for you because it's all
just
really, really great music.
Who cares what its called....(as long as you know where to find
it at
Tower!)
I suppose one could be concerned with aesthetics enough to
want actual history... So, in that case, The Blues came
first; before Jazz, that is. That (Blues), coming from
Gospel Music, and that coming from the "Field Chants" of
African slaves in America, and THAT coming from reworked
African tribal stuff of varying celebrations, feasts,
gathering of food, etc. Then came the so-called Delta Blues,
which worked it's magic into Urban Blues, and jazz evolved
at about the same time, taking on many directions almost
spontaneously. I think history shows that Dixieland took it
from bluesers jamming and became a fixed idiom that remains
today ala the Na'Lenz Jazz Funeral, and that "today's jazz"
probably evolved from folks wanting to hear one solo at a
time rather than all of 'em at once. White folks poked
around in there somewhere; ostensibly, to make the crude,
"acceptable..." q:P~~~ Regardless, all of those roots are
grounded firmly in "The Blues." And, if you can't play the
Blues, I sure wouldn't give ya two hoots for yer jazz... :)

(And, before anyone gets down on Americans for their abuse
of "natives," just know that there are no "Native
Americans." American Indians are not indigenous to this
country, they just got here before anyone else in MODERN
history. Wherefore, there is archeological evidence that
they probably moved out some humans who were here long
before them, as well... Also, some Injuns kept slaves, as
did some Africans, for that matter...)



We should be especially careful now about categorization because
of
all the new stuff going on. What I consider jazz, some guys will
say 'that ain't jazz' (Wynton says that alot about a lot of
people,
and its his way of putting people down, but this is really silly
too. No one woke up and 'created' jazz. It just happened...
and it
is happening now, so no one can really say it is or it ain't
jazz.)

Anyway, that't another topic altogether that I would rather not
get
into (unless someone REALLY wants to! ;))
Geez, there's so many variations, only an arrogant ass would
call one form "jazz" and another "not jazz." I've heard
people say there ain't no jazz in rock 'n roll, and yet,
there is, Fusion i.e. Same for C&W, 69b5 chords keep
creepin' in, Chet Atkins "broke the ice..." BB King can play
some wicked "mainstream jazz," I heard him doing it from his
dressing room at the Jazz Medium in Chicago about 20 years
ago. I recorded an album with Jethro Burns (Chet's
brother-in-law, BTW) in the mid-70s (about a year after
Homer died) on which he played Django stuff (and a killer
dedication original) on Mandolin, then he proceeded to play
the same stuff on a Martin D-45, soloing so well that it
intimidated the crap outa me, his then sorta mediocre (by
comparison) rhythm guitarist. Buddy Emmons (Nashville Steel
Guitarist) plays killer jazz on pedal steel... He plays
blues too, and recorded with Albert King, no less. Every
form of music has seen jazz creep in at some point or
another, even folk music. Brazilian music has it combined
with classical music. Then, there's all of this Afro-Latin
stuff... So, a better questions might be, what ISN'T jazz?
:)


Re: The difference between Jazz & Blues

 

Hi all,

Thank you so much for all of your responses on this subject.
I am now start to understand the differences between Jazz &
Blues music.

I look forward to learning Jazz music from you soon,
especialy the chords progression. I love Jazz's chords
progression !!!! :-)

Have a great day.

Cheers,
VDT

=====
Emails:
VietDuyTran@...
viettran@...

Website (Nha.c):


Re: Jimmy Bruno and Downbeat

Mark Stanley
 

OK, I'll do that. Tell me what CD it's on and I'll buy it.

I havent even heard Jimmy Bruno, so I wasnt making a
comparison of the two players. Just a general statement
about how really great musicians like the ones that come to
this forum, tend to put down players who are great and how
that seems like an ego problem to me. If you dont like 'em,
you dont like 'em. There's plenty of players I dont like, so
I dont listen to them. But I try to take it all in, bop,
blues, avante guard, noise, pop, rock, country. It's all
good. I hope I dont sound too self righteous. It's just my
negative experiences w/ jazz musicians in the past is
something that I've learned from. What I learned is that if
the world looks like sh*t it's because you have your head up
your ass.

I must concur, though, that Metheny Trio Live (the latest)
you could not fit into any film score, tv show, etc. It's
great playing and if you dont think so we can agree to
disagree.
:)MARK


--- jimlil00@... wrote:

The only comment I have seen about Metheney from
Bruno was in a
response to a question regarding current players and
when Metheny's
name was mentioned Bruno said something like "
Metheney plays jazz?"

Mark I find your remarks hard to swallow. Modern
jazz (bop
originated) is a wonderful art form. Metheney may be
a brilliant
musician and an inovator but his music puts me to
sleep. Its more for
the background to a tv program on the mating of
sperm whales than the
music of the the city, blues, drugs, slavery,
poverty, and
prohibition
that is echoed in swing/bop. I'm not putting him
down for what he
does, I just do not like what he does.
Since you seem to have made your mind up on Bruno, I
offer you a
challenge for the two guitatists on the same
grounds.
List to Metheney's solo on "Blues For Pat" on Joshua
Redman's album
and then listen to Jimmy's solo on "Au Privave" off
the Live at
Birdland cd. In the same tune form, you tell me who
is more
innovative
and imaginative.
Let your ears decide.


--- In jazz_guitar@y..., Mark Stanley
<bucketfullopuke@y...> wrote:
Welcome to the group. I think it's a good place
for all of
us to express our opinions.

You might want to check out the thread about Bruno
and see
what I think about hardcore jazzer's who seem
really close
minded and elitist. It is just my opinion, but I
think it
really stinks.

Whether you like Metheny or not, he is the player
of his
day, like Wes was to his and Charlie Christian to
his, and
so on. I happen to think Metheny is a complete
freakin'
genius, from his tone to his compositions to his
improvising. He is incredibly prolific, dedicated
and true
to his art.. I know what you mean about certain
player's
tone's. I cant really get with Mike Stern's tone,
but I like
his playing. I am pretty much against any
processed guitar
sound, which I know Metheny uses exclusively now
w/ the
digitech 2120 Artist rig (and I can hear the
difference in a
bad way).

Whatever Bruno said about Pat is probably
something that I
will find very arrogant and close minded ("but I
will fight
to the death for his right to say it" -Voltaire),
as is the
case with most "old school" bebopers, whose lines
you can
hear a mile away.

That being said, I'd still like to know what Bruno
said. I'd
also like to hear him make 30 years of "original"
music that
is cutting edge (most of it) and will stand the
test of time
like Pat has. If he's like most of these guys
living in the
bebop past, he probably writes a bunch of what I
would call
POOP. (salt peanuts, salt peanuts) We've evolved
here, ya
know. I guess one man's God can be another man's
clown,
that's cool. -Mark

PS- "Pat Metheny, I mean he can play, but..." you
might want
to back that up with a link to your own
playing...-Devil's
Advocate


--- "J. Randall (Randy) Groves"
<bebopguitar@y...> wrote:
Hello Jazzers: I'm new to the group, and I am
interested in the Bruno
thread. I am a big fan of Bruno. He and Robert
Conti
seem to be the
chops gods at the moment. Metheney? Did anyone
ever
post what Bruno
said? My view: Metheney can play, but I can't
stand
that digital
delay sound. It is so mushy! Every once in a
while I
try to listen to
him, but give up after a few minutes. I last
bought
the
Metheny/Scofield thing: nebulous jamming and
terrible tone on both
guitars. I prefer an acoustic archtop sound
(although Bruno has been
doing a lot on a solid body Benedetto--the
"Benny'
lately). My two
cents.

Randy Groves


Re: The difference between Jazz & Blues

Mark Stanley
 

If you play a blues record backwards the woman comes
back, you get rich and your car works, etc... Ha Ha.
Mark


Re: Jimmy Bruno and Downbeat

Paul Erlich
 

--- In jazz_guitar@y..., jimlil00@e... wrote:

The only comment I have seen about Metheney from Bruno was in a
response to a question regarding current players and when Metheny's
name was mentioned Bruno said something like " Metheney plays jazz?"

Mark I find your remarks hard to swallow. Modern jazz (bop
originated) is a wonderful art form. Metheney may be a brilliant
musician and an inovator but his music puts me to sleep. Its more for
the background to a tv program on the mating of sperm whales than
I used to think this about Metheny but he's put a lot of music out
and it isn't all like this. His latest _Trio->Live_ is really
exciting jazz. I don't think I've ever heard another guitarist who
understands harmony on such a deep level -- listen to "Giant Steps".
When has a soloist on that tune ever _flowed_ so well before?

the
music of the the city, blues, drugs, slavery, poverty, and
prohibition
that is echoed in swing/bop.
Frankly, I don't think either Jimmy Bruno or Pat Metheny have much
experience in these latter areas. Jimmy's pretty bad-ass, but only in
the "I spent 14 hours a day listening to jazz records and practicing
my guitar when I was growing up" kind of way.


Re: Digest Number 394

Mike Cover
 

Hey Jaim...
You look like Tiny Tim in that photo where you were eying
the camera!! But your group's music grooves!!
-Grandaddy Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: Jaim Zuber
To: jazz_guitar@...
Cc: nicholasbaham@...
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [jazz_guitar] Digest Number 394


At 09:48 PM 8/14/01 -0000, jazz_guitar@... wrote:
>Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 06:42:34 -0000
> From: nicholasbaham@...
>Subject: Vox amps
>
>I'm wondering if anyone out there has considered using Vox amps for
>jazz guitar performance. I have a Vox Cambridge that I use for
>practice and small gigs for my archtop and it really produces a nice
>clean tone that rings both warm and clear for the p90 pickups on my
>archtop. I've considered getting a larger Vox like the AC30. I'm
>wondering if anyone has had any experience using these.

I've been gigging with a Matchless DC-30 (Vox AC30 clone) and a 50's Guild
Thinline hollowbody. I get a nice warm tone, with a touch of overdrive when
I turn up. I love it. Had many folks rave about it too. I plugged into
AC-30's (if the store had one) when I was guitar shopping. They don't have
a wide range of tones but they do have sounds great. I do more of a
jazz/funk thing, I haven't used it for a straight jazz gig.

jaim
www.rare-medium.com


Re: Jimmy Bruno and Downbeat

 

Absolute poppycock. Metheny's work with Jaco 25 years ago
was innovative as hell. Check out Metheny's work with Chick
Corea, Dave Holland, and Gary Burton. My ears decided long
ago. Jimmy's great, but innovative? More like old-school
bop.

Mike Crutcher
Guitarist/Vocalist/Arranger/Instructor
Available for sessions/fill-ins/performances/private lessons.

"You've Got To Funkifize"
-Tower Of Power

From: jimlil00@...
Reply-To: jazz_guitar@...
To: jazz_guitar@...
Subject: [jazz_guitar] Re: Jimmy Bruno and Downbeat
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:13:10 -0000

The only comment I have seen about Metheney from Bruno was in a
response to a question regarding current players and when Metheny's
name was mentioned Bruno said something like " Metheney plays jazz?"

Mark I find your remarks hard to swallow. Modern jazz (bop
originated) is a wonderful art form. Metheney may be a brilliant
musician and an inovator but his music puts me to sleep. Its more for
the background to a tv program on the mating of sperm whales than the
music of the the city, blues, drugs, slavery, poverty, and
prohibition
that is echoed in swing/bop. I'm not putting him down for what he
does, I just do not like what he does.
Since you seem to have made your mind up on Bruno, I offer you a
challenge for the two guitatists on the same grounds.
List to Metheney's solo on "Blues For Pat" on Joshua Redman's album
and then listen to Jimmy's solo on "Au Privave" off the Live at
Birdland cd. In the same tune form, you tell me who is more
innovative
and imaginative.
Let your ears decide.


--- In jazz_guitar@y..., Mark Stanley <bucketfullopuke@y...> wrote:
Welcome to the group. I think it's a good place for all of
us to express our opinions.

You might want to check out the thread about Bruno and see
what I think about hardcore jazzer's who seem really close
minded and elitist. It is just my opinion, but I think it
really stinks.

Whether you like Metheny or not, he is the player of his
day, like Wes was to his and Charlie Christian to his, and
so on. I happen to think Metheny is a complete freakin'
genius, from his tone to his compositions to his
improvising. He is incredibly prolific, dedicated and true
to his art.. I know what you mean about certain player's
tone's. I cant really get with Mike Stern's tone, but I like
his playing. I am pretty much against any processed guitar
sound, which I know Metheny uses exclusively now w/ the
digitech 2120 Artist rig (and I can hear the difference in a
bad way).

Whatever Bruno said about Pat is probably something that I
will find very arrogant and close minded ("but I will fight
to the death for his right to say it" -Voltaire), as is the
case with most "old school" bebopers, whose lines you can
hear a mile away.

That being said, I'd still like to know what Bruno said. I'd
also like to hear him make 30 years of "original" music that
is cutting edge (most of it) and will stand the test of time
like Pat has. If he's like most of these guys living in the
bebop past, he probably writes a bunch of what I would call
POOP. (salt peanuts, salt peanuts) We've evolved here, ya
know. I guess one man's God can be another man's clown,
that's cool. -Mark

PS- "Pat Metheny, I mean he can play, but..." you might want
to back that up with a link to your own playing...-Devil's
Advocate


--- "J. Randall (Randy) Groves"
<bebopguitar@y...> wrote:
Hello Jazzers: I'm new to the group, and I am
interested in the Bruno
thread. I am a big fan of Bruno. He and Robert Conti
seem to be the
chops gods at the moment. Metheney? Did anyone ever
post what Bruno
said? My view: Metheney can play, but I can't stand
that digital
delay sound. It is so mushy! Every once in a while I
try to listen to
him, but give up after a few minutes. I last bought
the
Metheny/Scofield thing: nebulous jamming and
terrible tone on both
guitars. I prefer an acoustic archtop sound
(although Bruno has been
doing a lot on a solid body Benedetto--the "Benny'
lately). My two
cents.

Randy Groves