i have to respectfully disagree, between the type of strings, pick,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
fingers, where the player plucks the strings, tone controls, dynamics, attack, etc, etc, there is more than enough room to create one's own sound. and they are for the most part free or relatively inexpensive. i recently paid particular attention to a jazz recording i happened to hear on the radio. the artist rarely played a straight note. the vast majority had some type of inflection, that had much more to do the the quality of sound than anything else. there were slides from above, slides from below, bent notes, some were plenty bent and others, less so, there were notes that were only slightly implied by judicious use of dynamics and soft attack, notes were played all around and sometimes on the beat, vibrato or lack of it was apparent in infinite variety, quickly repeated notes were played but each was subtly or in some cases not so sublty different, each had a different sound. if one finds a artist that is unlistenable my guess would be that their is a mismatch between taste and execution, not gear. my only conclusion has to be that given the same equipment, any artist that one finds pleasing would still be found pleasing and any artist that one finds lacking in some way would still be found lacking. it is unreasonable to think that one could buy ones way to a successful sound. or more compellingly that one would be so destitute that their taste and talent would not prevail. now that i think about it.. if this is not the case, i'm not sure it is a goal worthy of pursuit. huey --- In jazz_guitar@..., "bebmen" <bebmen@y...> wrote:
|