Floyd,
I've operated old separates here in some contests and definitely
feel your pain.? The only set I have that works easily is the
Collins S line but even to get that behaving properly took some
modifications.? So my rule here now on contesting with old gear is
to run, and not do any S&P, with the separates.??
If I am needing to do S&P as well, then I will use something
like the TR4C or other era similar transceiver for the S&P
stuff as it's much easier to be QRG agile with it.? And I have the
pleasure of adding more heat to the shack while I'm at it.? :)?
Not really a specific solution to this issue but it does have the
attraction of getting contest Qs without having to do any rig
mods.?
73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
On 11/23/2024 8:44 AM, Floyd - K8AC via
groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 05:39 PM, waltcates wrote:
Yes. The entire SR series of transceivers has
receiver incremental tuning, RIT. Hallicrafters had the
original patten on the RIT concept and was the first?to go
into production with it.
Wow - everyone has missed the point entirely.? Guess there
aren't many folks using Hallicrafters gear in CW mode,
particularly in contests.? I will go into greater detail and
hope I don't offend anyone.??
?
Note: all of the following applies to the HT-44 with the rear
slide switch in XCVE (transceive) mode.? The goal here is: when
you tune in a CW station on the SX-117 (with the HT44 slide
switch in XCVE mode), you want the HT-44 to be tuned TO THE SAME
FREQUENCY AS THAT OF THE STATION YOU'RE HEARING.? That way, the
station you're calling will hear you at a reasonable pitch.?
But, when setting up the SX-117 and HT-44 for receive mode, you
adjust C1 for zero beat, putting the transmitter and receiver on
exactly the same frequency.? For SSB, that's exactly what you
want and it works perfectly.? But, for transceiving in CW mode,
you want the two to be offset by the frequency of the CW tone
you like to hear - say, 600 to 700 Hz.? On my HT-44, the range
of adjustment of C1 can provide an offset of around 200 Hz, not
enough.? Many early manufacturers of transceive capable gear got
this offset thing wrong - notably Collins.? If you wanted to
transceive in CW mode on the S Line, you ended up with an offset
of 1.5 Khz in some cases and that's simply not usable.? Drake
got this right in their 4 Line with a fixed offset of around 700
Hz.? In SSB mode, the offset is zero, but switching to CW
changes it to 700 Hz.??
?
So, what I'm after is being able to shift the frequency of
the HT-44 carrier oscillator by 600-700 Hz in an adjustable
fashion so that I can still put it back to 1650 Khz for SSB
operation.? Not something I'd often do, so a screwdriver
adjustment is entirely acceptable.? In the HT-44, the crystal
frequency is varied by adjusting C1, a capacitor in parallel
with the crystal.? You can also adjust the frequency of a
crystal oscillator using a capacitor in series with the
crystal.? A good way to do that in the HT-44 might be to use
varicap diodes.? But, pulling a crystal frequency has
limitations and in this case, I have no idea how far we could
actually pull the crystal frequency without some negative
effects.? Hence my original question: has anyone actually done
this and how did it work out?? ?Some academic papers I've read
on the subject of pulling a crystal frequency indicate that 50
ppm might be the limit, but it depends upon the crystal cut and
a lot of other factors.??
?
And, yes, an RIT function would satisfy my requirement but
that doesn't exist on the SX-117.? Fiddling with the BFO
frequency does NOT solve the problem and no need to explain that
here.? For now, I continue to use the SX-117/HT-44 for CW in the
NORM mode, having to switch the Operation switch to CAL and
turning the HT-44 VFO to the desired frequency.??
?
73, Floyd - K8AC
?