¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHalden, very interesting and ?thoughtful comments getting into the nitty-gritty. Re the turning off part: The switch needs to? break any current and open the conduction path enough to withstand the voltage. Long-winded ..if there is no inductance, it is easy. If there lots of inductance and lots of amps, there is lots of energy stored in the inductance, and you have to dump the energy somewhere, usually into I?R and arcing and waiting for current to die to zero[very tough for DC switching] ????I have run on¡? but energy in an inductance varies with the square of current, so at high current it is tough to break the circuit, or maybe it is tough on the switch. ? And going on to your wording/thinking, I am not much help, but as I recall, there is a hopefully small magnetizing current ?and flux that depends on the ac voltage, almost no matter the current. ??The primary MMF and current fight ?very hard to cancel the secondary MMF and current keeping the net flux in the core small [effective negative feedback].? All this is to say that ?your idea is tempting, but it gets more complex, ..for another future day , so? I have to stick with what¡¯s at the top. ?don ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of HF via groups.io
Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 4:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] HT-37 transformer failure due to rapid STBY-->OFF-->STBY ? Hi Don, _._,_._,_ -- don??? va3drl |