¿ªÔÆÌåÓýTrue, but a good approximation of the noise in the vicinity of the receiver antenna can be sampled and used to reduce the noise coming in along with the desired signal from the main antenna.? The noise from the secondary system, must, as you point out, be as close as possible to the noise being picked up by the primary antenna.? Cancellation is, of course, incomplete, so elimination is not possible, but quite significant reduction is indeed possible and has been proven in the field.? Needless to say, the noise receiving system must not pick up much of the desired signal.? This can be effected both by operating the two receive systems on dissimilar frequencies, and also by utilizing a receive antenna location that will pick up the closest possible envelope to the noise the primary antenna receives but picks up a minimal amount of the desired signal. ? Mike Langner ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mike Feher
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2024 6:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] SX-117 noise limiter behavior ? It seems to me, that since noise is neither correlate-able or stochastic, elimination is not possible. Also the multiple antenna theory is out the window since RF generated noise travels at the speed of light. 73 ¨C Mike ? Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell NJ 07731 908-902-3831 ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Maynard Wright, P. E., W6PAP via groups.io ? Another technique for reducing or eliminating noise was to introduce |