¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: SX-117 noise limiter behavior


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

True, but a good approximation of the noise in the vicinity of the receiver antenna can be sampled and used to reduce the noise coming in along with the desired signal from the main antenna.? The noise from the secondary system, must, as you point out, be as close as possible to the noise being picked up by the primary antenna.? Cancellation is, of course, incomplete, so elimination is not possible, but quite significant reduction is indeed possible and has been proven in the field.? Needless to say, the noise receiving system must not pick up much of the desired signal.? This can be effected both by operating the two receive systems on dissimilar frequencies, and also by utilizing a receive antenna location that will pick up the closest possible envelope to the noise the primary antenna receives but picks up a minimal amount of the desired signal.

How much improvement is available?? Results vary widely with the nature of the noise and the environment in which the noise is being received.? Still, the reduction is often very, very worthwhile!

As always, your mileage may vary!!

Mike/
K5MGR
_____________________________________________

?

Mike Langner
929 Alameda Road NW
Albuquerque, NM 87114-1901

(505) 898-3212 home/home office
(505) 238-8810 cell
mlangner@...

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mike Feher
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2024 6:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] SX-117 noise limiter behavior

?

It seems to me, that since noise is neither correlate-able or stochastic, elimination is not possible. Also the multiple antenna theory is out the window since RF generated noise travels at the speed of light. 73 ¨C Mike

?

Mike B. Feher, N4FS

89 Arnold Blvd.

Howell NJ 07731

908-902-3831

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Maynard Wright, P. E., W6PAP via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2024 7:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HallicraftersRadios] SX-117 noise limiter behavior

?

Another technique for reducing or eliminating noise was to introduce
local noise to the front end of a receiver from a local "noise antenna."
The amplitude and phase of that noise could be adjusted to, hopefully,
cancel the noise received by the signal antenna.

Early BC-342 and BC-312 receivers featured a noise suppression circuit
of this type. War Department TM 11-850 states that the noise antenna
was intended to eliminate ignition noise when the receiver was mounted
in a vehicle.

By the time my BC-342-N was born (1942), the noise antenna and
associated circuitry were omitted, so that circuit may not have worked
well. The September, 1946 revision of the TM notes that spare parts
were no longer available for the noise suppression circuit and
recommends removing it if any of the components fail.

MFJ has featured at least one similar unit, the MFJ-1026, which is now
listed as sold out. There are other such units available but I have no
experience with them.

73,

Maynard
W6PAP

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.