开云体育

China is easy to misunderstand. Sadly, I am not allowed by NDA with a client to go into detail. Let me ONLY say that - while bashing the Chinese gets you brownie points with the good looking

Dave - absolutely agree! IMO we (US) seem to have a bit of a learning problem and have not demonstrated the capability of LONG TERM LEARNING. Cheers! Bruce Quoting Dave McGuire

There certainly isn't. And I'm sure that wasn't appreciated by any of the respected, educated engineers here who happen to be Asian. We are unified here by the purity of engineering, and common

I can remember MarvinTest did sth similar some years ago...they had some HP compatible gens With best regards Tam HANNA -- Enjoy electronics, 3D printing and cigars? Join more than 21000 followers on

The Chinese make lots of truly excellent stuff. I've had occasion to work with Chinese engineers a few times over the last decade or so, and I've been very impressed. However, us stupid Americans

Calma chicos :) there's no need for inappropriate language here. Jeff, it has not much to do with the origin it of the parts. There are certain precision SMAs, yes. But they have a similar price tag

A12 maybe have damaged according to my test . Tonight below test items have been finished: 1. The voltage on A1 test connector can meet manual value . 2. The value of powers input to A12 are all

Suppose I have an application that is picky and has a list of various supported signal generators. Are there anything that’s strictly compatible, with a subset or superset of commands I might be

Didn't you receive the information on this device in the thread you started earlier this week? /g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment/topic/scc_1906_0231/97341967 Greg

Dave - THANKS - It is simply uncalled for. And YES some of the Chinese connectors are of poor quality - but part of the reason is that people insist on low prices. The Chinese do make some excellent

Jeff! There will be NO (Zero, NADA) racism on this mailing list. -Dave, moderator -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

REALLY Jeff - I DO NOT SEE THE NEED FOR THE USE OF DIVISIVE NAME CALLING. It s OK (IMO) to call out CHINESE connectors of poor quality, it is ABSOLUTELY UNACCEPTABLE IN THIS FORUM TO USE THAT TERM.

Way back when in 1986,when I first purchased 2.92 Connectors from Wiltron ( the inventor, which was why HP did the 2.4, cause they couldnt stand buying connector from their competitor, Wiltron),

drkirkby@...> wrote: No, that wasn’t the paper. There is one giving corrections between 2.92 and 3.5 mm, but concludes not to bother trying to correct with SMA. -- Dr. David

Hi, unless you do some very critical work and need to see 50dB of matching... :) I'd say it will not matter in practical terms. I have never "seen" the transition in normal work And never directly

wrote: There’s not much difference. You can model the transition as a shunt capacitor, the value of which I don’t know ??? I can not recall the format of the data, but the calibration kit

One thing I should also mention is the IF out connection on the rear of your 8593 should be terminated to 50 ohms when not being used. I noted on mine I would get level errors if it was left floating.

For adjusting the LODA in you 8593, refer to the service guide for 8590 series analyzers, assembly level repair manual. Pages 139-141 for options 09/10.

Dear Askild Thanks for your help ! I am reading service manual now . And one 26.5Ghz spectrum analyzer and one 500Mhz oscillascope are on my hand . So i think i will check the power ,signal according

Hi, I know that APC 3.5mm and APC 2.92mm connectors mechanically mate. What I would like to know: What is the electrical impact of doing so? Background: I had the chance to measure some 3,5mm DUTs on