¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: Keysight customer support policy


 

I've had multiple businesses through the years - of all varieties, LLC, Corp C, Corp B, etc. - and given it's relatively easy in the US to start a business (though it varies state by state, including the cost obligations, which being yearly, can dramatically impact the calculations along other considerations), and that it's trivial to purchase?a domain and offer a more professional face, I never felt much of an nuisance to have at least one of the two (the latter) active, even if the first may have lapsed given which state I was living in and other contingencies.?

Obviously, there's more foul stuff being described here than what just that would cure (and it reinforces my decision against considering Keysight for some new equipment buys, when I occasionally?considered this, and instead stay the course of repairing and restoring their incredible old products, frequently with the amazing help of communities such as this). But having a business email address is, in my opinion, a baseline requirement for dealing with any professional entity (essentially, as equals), and again, an easily achievable and at a very low cost exigency. I just mean to say it's an easy aspect to get out of the way. Having a website hasn't been something I've always had the resources or the time to provide myself with, and I feel KS specifically checking on that crosses into nitpicking territory. I've dealt with completely legit outfits in my professional life (contractors, even consultants, etc.) that never had a website for their firm. I've been getting, at times, three to thirteen calls a week by different parties to build it for me though.?

Others have described, here and elsewhere, the wild variations of how these large entities interact with some of us here (contacting them from our garage or corporate lab). A standout for me is Fluke, which will swifthly get you to at least their customer relations?engineer (I forget the exact title), who will talk to you with not even a whiff of a hint they object to spending their time having that conversation, follow up duly, investigate internally when that's warranted, etc. Just outstandingly professional, competent, respectful, and helpful communication. Both Keysight and Fluke (but not R&S, as far as I'm aware...) are honorable enough they provide PDFs of SMs, the "old enough" component-level, for most/all of their old units (though I wish their quality would be better, which seems to be such an easy thing to improve on), but the rest of it is wildly divergent. Unfortunately, this also means at least Keysight - and I feel, probably, also Tektronix, though I have much less knowledge of them as things stand today - is digging a hole for themselves during incredibly competitive times and no one can really predict where we're heading. Just running on the cache of their past value and history, even if they still make some of the best and most sophisticated pieces of equipment and instrumentation out there, in my opinion, just means time will be the great equalizer. We've seen the Siglents and the Rigols and the rest of the pack catching up year by year by year.?
Radu.?

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 5:44?AM oldtestgear via <phil=[email protected]> wrote:
Keysight will repair the E44xx series of sensors but at a very high cost. I had one repaired in February at a cost of ?1560 inc VAT with a 90 warranty.? Still cheaper than an unknown on eBay but painful. They only deal with me because I set up a company? just to get a few DMMs calibrated. A job they had been happily doing for years until the change of policy.?
?
Phil

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.