Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Taking a Arduino Nano to 3.3V...It's possible, but it won't connect for the PC app...
PLEASE DISREGARD THIS ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND SEE THE MESSAGE POSTED ON 2/18 FOR MORE INFO.
TinySA Team, Today, I took a programmed Arduino Nano (with TinySA for the Nano) and performed the 'surgery' to the schematic to make the Nano a 3.3VDC compliant device by replacing the regulator to a 3.3V type (from 5V) and a few cuts and jumps (I improvised on the cuts and took out a diode where it was clearly not being used). I am here to tell you that while all that is possible and all the measurements I took and the checkout of the I/Os looked good...It WON'T communicate to Erik's TinySA Windows PC program. The PC 'sees' the modified board as a 'COM4' device (sometimes this can also be a 'COM11' device) but no matter what, the TinySA PC program DOES NOT see the 'COM4' device when powered and running and it cannot even start it because it never makes the list - - the list just shows 'Mockup. It may work for other applications, but not for TinySA, and it also becomes more problematic to upload a sketch to the device even when powered in-situ in the setup, too - multiple bad read and write errors. In closing, I would NOT advise doing this for the Arduino Nano for the TinySA application. I have become a believer that Level Shifting is necessary to make this work for the TinySA and a standard 5V programmed Arduino Nano - that's how I'm going to try mine next. 73 de Marty, KN0CK |
Could you reliably download to the Nano before you did the surgery?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Have you tied the old 3.3v and old 5.0v (now 3.3v) rails together? Have you measured the output of the 3.3v regulator, verified it is a solid 3.3v even when downloading? I haven't tried it with a tinySA yet, but I do have a Nano hacked to 3.3v that reliably downloads firmware?from a USB host. Jerry, KE7ER On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 08:08 PM, Marty Wittrock wrote: TinySA Team, |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYes Marty,Mine communicates and programs fine on 3.3v, you must have something wrong. I used the very common 4 channel level shifter board from ebay. ? Just search for ¡°4 channel level shifter¡±. It has a High Voltage side and a Low? Voltage side, DIP style module . ?You could just use 2 resistor voltage dividers too. 73, Gary? WB6OGD? On Feb 16, 2020, at 8:27 PM, Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke@...> wrote:
|
Hi
Please be aware that the Atmega328 is operated beyond specifications, 8161D¨CAVR¨C10/09 section 28.3 Speed Grades, when subject to 3,3 V and a 16 MHz clock. Between 2,7 V and 4,5 V the slope is about 5,6 MHz/V resulting in a safe operating clock of 13,3 MHz. So timing could be affected. There are Arduinos with an Atmega328 running at 3,3 V available but they run at 8 MHz: In this day and age many devices run at 3,3 V so I would strongly recommend using an Arduino Zero, i.e. ARM M0+ SAMD21 type. It may be a little bit more expensive but you get SO much more computing power and built in USB: Bo www.rudius.net/oz2m :: www.rfzero.net |
If you have a junkbox full of Nanos, I say go for it.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It's a hobby. Many have hacked the Nano for 3.3v, most web reports state it works just fine at 16mhz. Saw one report that it worked better at 3.3v than 5.0v when overclocking to 25mhz. If worried about remaining in spec, could set the clock speed to 8mhz by setting a divide-by-two at the start of you code.? ? ?? Or move the 3.3v rail up a little bit in the direction of 3.7v. My primary concern is that the Nano costs $2. With everybody competing to sell it a nickel cheaper, there is inevitable pressure to use floor sweepings when scrounging for parts. Some uBitx users were finding that their Nano was sucking 4x the current it should, for example. Yes, the ARM processors are much more capable. I'm hoping to have an SA running off an RPi. But if you have a Nano, it can work at 3.3v Jerry, KE7ER On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 04:34 AM, Bo, OZ2M wrote:
Hi |
Jerry, Gary & Bo,
Thanks for the responses - much appreciated. While I did a lot of checkout of the Nano when I did the mod to it to ensure it was worthy of being installed in the setup. I do have to review why I'm having the issue with the Nano I have to get to the root cause. The PC does see it as a 'COM4' device, so it's reading the traffic off the USB serial interface fine - but after that it's not able to communicate with the microcontroller enough to function with Erik's Windows app for the TinySA - the PC program could not see it as a COM4 device - didn't show up in the list. I thought I'd try a reload to see if it was possible amongst other troublehooting last night). A LOT of errors when it tried to reprogram the device in-situ.? I will take it off the board and see if I can get to the bottom of why it's not functioning right and will post a correction if I can make it play. Please do stay tuned... 73 de Marty, KN0CK |
When I start Erik's Windows app,? it sometimes says "sweeper not found" or the box only has "mockup" but when the
main window comes up, just go to "Connect" and then the COM port shows up, click it and then the App runs fine. USB connection is a problem, my PHSNA has the exact same problem, though actually much worse, I have to reset the Arduino several times to get it to connect... 73, Gary WB6OGD |
UPDATE - UPDATE - UPDATE
I want to go on the record that my statement on Sunday pertaining to the Arduino Nano cannot be modified for 3.3VDC by changing the regulator and doing some additional wiring was a flawed statement. I found on a completely different forum that the information on how to modify a Arduino Nano was also flawed and the schematic I used to modify my Nano from that forum had at least two issues that made the Nano not operate in my setup once modified to their schematic. Once I found those issues and repaired them to be correct to the V3.2 Nano schematic the Nano in my setup is running excellent, seen by the TinySA Windows application as a COM4 device and it perfectly capable of 'steering' my setup perfectly. Please disregard the title of this message and carry on with modifying your Nano with the CORRECT information found on this forum. 73 de Marty, KN0CK |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss