Re: Fullscreen debugger for MVS 3.8J?
I am also interested in MVSDDT because of some debugging I needed to do the day before yesterday, but it seems it requires communication with a Java task and run a gui next to the 3270 so I lapsed
By
[email protected]
·
#4177
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
They can do far more than this, even in traditional
fields.
Like linear search, in O(sqrt(n)) instead of O(n), just
to speak about data.
Or integer prime factorization in polynomial time instead
of
By
Giuseppe Vitillaro
·
#4176
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
The quantum computers are suited toward simulations of reality, more along
the CDC/Cray massive parallel processing.
wrote:
By
Mike Schwab
·
#4175
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
Nice to know.
The english vocabulary is probably one of the largest
between the european languages ;-)
English speakers have access to latin and german
words. We, poor italians, must accomplish
By
Giuseppe Vitillaro
·
#4174
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, Dave Wade wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Giuseppe
>> Vitillaro
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 9:27 AM
>>
By
Giuseppe Vitillaro
·
#4173
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
By
Dave Wade
·
#4172
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
By
Dave Wade
·
#4171
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
I understad, really an hyper protective behaviour.
Just because MVS had been rewritten in this language?
By the way, from what I've seen, MVS3.8j sources
are pure assembler, wi
By
Giuseppe Vitillaro
·
#4170
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
By the way, going off-topic now, for what
I may understand of IBM in these days, the
corporation, "mom", may be on the border
of leaving even from the mainframe businness.
IBM defintely has the most
By
Giuseppe Vitillaro
·
#4169
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
Just googled for this words, Greg:
"the behaviour of someone who is very determined and refuses to give up, to change their mind, or to do what others want them to do: He was losing patience with her
By
Giuseppe Vitillaro
·
#4168
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
I'll suggest "bloody-minded"...
Cheers,
Greg
By
Greg Price
·
#4167
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
When I worked for IBM I saw how protective IBM was of the PL/S, PL/AS, PL/X compiler. All of the manuals were marked IBM Confidential. There were security audit police that would check a particular
By
Charles Bailey
·
#4166
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
In the '60s, there was BSL (basic systems language). It is the predecessor
of PL/S.
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/360/bsl/
Joe
wrote:
By
Joe Monk
·
#4165
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
This match with what I'm reading on Wiki, it
looks like the Rand Company just di
By
Giuseppe Vitillaro
·
#4164
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
Who asked for that?
If I even would find a PL/S compiler I would
use it under MVS3.8j and only under MVS3.8j.
Even if created for MVT it should run
under MVS3.8j beside OS dependencies
I wouldn't
By
Giuseppe Vitillaro
·
#4163
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
"MVT and MVS are now just toys for hobbists, not
OS for real iron."
You know how IBM insists on maintaining forward compatibility, even in z/OS?
Like, how you can take an object module from OS/360,
By
Joe Monk
·
#4162
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
Thank you, but not really, from what I can read the nearest
italian word to "pique" seems "dispetto".
The word "puntglio" is when you insist on a
point just because you are not likely to admit
you
By
Giuseppe Vitillaro
·
#4161
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
I doubt if IBM could have sued RAND successfully. Back then, the arguments were about look and feel, and trying to patent a programming language would fail as it would be deemed a mere mathematical
By
Laird Heal
·
#4160
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
By
Dave Wade
·
#4159
·
|
Re: IBM METALC curiosity.
Giuseppe Vitillaro wrote:
[...]
pique?
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+pique
--
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
Software Development Laboratories
http://www.softdevlabs.com
mail:
By
Fish Fish
·
#4158
·
|