开云体育

Since everyone seems to be waxing nostalgic about their programming experience these days, here's my contribution: I started learning Fortan in 1967, which ran on the campus's IBM 7040 mainframe.

Mike; I think it will default to my old system catalog not to the one I created on the empty volume SY2KB. IEF376I? JOB/TWO$70? /STOP? 2020333.1151 CPU??? 0MIN 00.16SEC SRB??? 0MIN

Not needed. If you didn't created a matching alias the default is the master catalog. <rahimazizarab@...> wrote:

Hi Carlos, The 360 Mod 40 was rated at about 125,000 instructions per second or 125KPS. I would expect your 64 bit 3G processor to deliver around 60,000,000 instructions per second or 60MIPS. That is

I ran the JCL to create an IPL volume and it went flawlessly.? Then I created my Master catalog which went fine too; but when it came time to allocate my system datasets (SYS1) under my newly created

May be then I should use a Virtual Machine running windows with a slower clock and use h390 on it

Hello Carlos, Am 28.11.2020 um 21:27 schrieb carlos feldman <carlfelster@...>: As far as I know, Hercules speed entirely depends on the Hosts’s CPU. I guess, both. :-) :wq! PoC

I had many favorites over the years.? Fortran IV was the first.? That then shifted for SPS (IBM 1620 assembler) and then to BAL (S/360).? PL/I was lurking in the background before it finally

Reduce the memory to 16 in your config file it is the MAIN parameter. regards; Rahim

Hi everyone, I'm testing sort routines (IHESRTA), in PL/I. Even with modest 25 K and only one WORK disk, speed is blazing fast to sort 32K 190 byte registers, less than a second, compliation and

Apart from some playing at Kingston Polytechnic after school, I started with PL/1 and assembly under VM/SP, then assembly, 3270 datastreams, PL/1, VSAM, IMS, and all the usual under MVS, and then MVS

Started in 1971 with writing COBOL. I was a few years an application programmer, but systems programming had my attention. So I became a systems programmer. My first job was replace OS/VS2 SVS by MVS.

Being a microcontroller programmer, I'm very close to assembly, and it's bit byte and interrupts management, but I prefer using C, which in turn is very close to assembly, if you use properly. Of

There is a new version of SDL-Hyperion out.? The following is the Howto for it. ??????? sudo apt update ??????? sudo apt list --upgradable ???? ? ??????? sudo apt install

Similar to Wally’s story, for me it is all about Assembler, all of the time. I’ve been writing IBM Assembler code since 1978. It comes so naturally to me that code flies out of the keyboard like

Started, in 1985, with Algol 60 and the keystroke code to program the Texas Instruments TI-59 at university, dabbled a tiny bit with with Basic, and followed that with Turbo Pascal (2.00, 3.01a, 6.00

Hi https://youtu.be/P2yr-3F6PQo '(peace) -- Marco Antoniotti Somewhere over the rainbow

In all these missives regarding programming languages used et al, no one has mentioned 1. RPG, RPG II (and later)? from IBM 1401 and newer systems. 2. Macro assembler??????? from IBM 1401,

Those are great one’s. I enjoyed; REXX, Blankenship Basic, ADA, an old Army Program Sircus and COBOL. George

+1, that is a true statement. Cussing the machine is the one thing we programmers all have in common. But in response to the original question, I think there is no need for a “favorite” language.