开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
I suspect this lack is why there is the effort to support Linux KVM on current processors.? That eliminates the need for VM for those interested in virtualizing Linux.? While I doubt is is as
By Harold Grovesteen · #248 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
I believe that it is all about brand image and perception. Anything that has the ability to impair their brand image is forbidden it might affect share value in a bad way. In that environment no one
By Dave Wade · #247 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
You wonder why they ar
By John Palmer · #246 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
Hello! Dave W is correct, despite the Weeping Angel in his garden, I once asked an IBMer (now retired!) about releasing the rest of the VM/370 content to the community since the base is out in the
By Gregg Levine · #245 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
Of course.? HAHAHA.? Lawyers...
By Harold Grovesteen · #244 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
John, There appears to be some debate, in that explicit regulations for software copyright appeared in 1980, but some lawyers say 1976 is the relevant date. Dave Sent: Wednesday, March 27,
By Dave Wade · #243 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
Hmm, that means that perhaps *ASMH is free and clear, since I think the IBM product from which it was created predates 1980. As for things like Pascal (*PASCALVS) and Fortran 77 (*FTNVS), these may
By John Palmer · #242 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
By Harold Grovesteen · #241 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
By Dave Wade · #240 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
By Dave Wade · #239 ·
Re: Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
You're right, D6 seems to contain some version of the HIM code. This is a surprise to me, I had thought all this time that it didn't appear in MTS until later. The ultimate reference for questions
By Mike Alexander · #238 ·
Does d6.0 have any definitions for TCP/IP Services
When I load d6.0, it starts a Telnet server task and the IPL info shows it attempting to activate telnet connections, but says that none are available. Is that because TABLES doesn't have any
By John Palmer · #237 ·
Re: Which Hercules version for d7.0?
My experience with d6.0 under Hercules is that the system can stay up about two weeks before it will crash. The crash takes the form of a super-dump and is triggered by someone trying to sign into an
By John Palmer · #236 ·
Re: Which Hercules version for d7.0?
Douglas Wade wrote: I am commenting on an ancient thread (from last April), I thought I had re-registered for this group when it switched to groups.io but apparently I did not.? I am really only
By Thomas Valerio · #235 ·
Re: A number of questions about MTS.
By Dave Wade · #234 ·
Re: A number of questions about MTS.
Sure, some could be added. However we aren't really anxious to do more with D6. I'd rather put my effort into getting the 1996 system out. Mike
By Mike Alexander · #233 ·
Re: A number of questions about MTS.
Mike, One of the other questions was why are there no 2703 or similar lines defined it the released versions. I know when you did the release there was little support for these in Hercules but we now
By Dave Wade · #232 ·
Re: A number of questions about MTS.
I don't think I answered this question. When MTS was shut down in 1996 Postscript support was mostly complete but not really released yet. However it mostly works. MTS documentation is generally
By Mike Alexander · #231 ·
Re: A number of questions about MTS.
I have a (very dim) recollection that the 3083 at SFU in 1991 had a whopping 24 MB of memory - but someone else from SFU can correct me if I'm hallucinating again. ;-) It's fun to run MTS on a modern
By Richard - VE7CVS · #230 ·
Re: Some of you are about to be removed from the group
As was mentioned before, the list owner has NO CONTROL over this. Groups.IO is sending out the requests to verify your e-mail address, NOT the list owner of H390-MTS. Posting a request on this list
By John Palmer · #229 ·