On 04/15/2018 07:25 AM, Shal Farley wrote:
CHANGE: Instead of changing the Message-ID for all recipients, we now
?? only change the Message-ID for the original sender.
I'm not able to put my finger on why, but this one has my spidey-sense
tingling. It just seems wrong to distribute the "same" message with
different Messsage-ID content.
Looking at it from a citation/legal POV, is the original Message-ID
placed in a field "X-Message-ID"? If so, then it is quasi-acceptable.
However, if the original Message-ID is no longer in the message, then
you just destroyed the ability to differentiate between messages. I am
aware that Message-IDs are, in theory, non-unique.
jonathon
